Reflections on Arctic Maritime Delimitations: A Comparative Analysis between the Case Law and State Practice

Abstract The determination of spatial ambit of the coastal State jurisdiction is fundamental for ocean governance and the same applies to the Arctic Ocean. In this regard, a question arises how it is possible to delimit marine spaces where the jurisdiction of two or more coastal States overlaps. Wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nordic Journal of International Law
Main Author: Tanaka, Yoshifumi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2011
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181011x598436
https://brill.com/view/journals/nord/80/4/article-p459_3.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/nord/80/4/article-p459_3.xml
Description
Summary:Abstract The determination of spatial ambit of the coastal State jurisdiction is fundamental for ocean governance and the same applies to the Arctic Ocean. In this regard, a question arises how it is possible to delimit marine spaces where the jurisdiction of two or more coastal States overlaps. Without rules on maritime delimitation in marine spaces where the jurisdiction of coastal States overlaps, the legal uses of these spaces cannot be enjoyed effectively. In this sense, maritime delimitation is of paramount importance in the Arctic Ocean governance. Thus, this study will examine Arctic maritime delimitations by comparing them to the case law concerning maritime delimitation. In so doing, this study seeks to clarify features of Arctic maritime delimitations.