Defining the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf across the Arctic Basin: The Russian Submission, States' Rights, Boundary Delimitation and Arctic Regional Cooperation

Abstract The Russian submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) provides an excellent example of the difficulty faced by Arctic states in relation to their rights and claims as coastal states. The geology and geography of the Arctic submarine environment are complex a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Main Author: Weber, Mel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2009
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180809x455629
https://brill.com/view/journals/estu/24/4/article-p653_4.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/estu/24/4/article-p653_4.xml
Description
Summary:Abstract The Russian submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) provides an excellent example of the difficulty faced by Arctic states in relation to their rights and claims as coastal states. The geology and geography of the Arctic submarine environment are complex and poorly understood. Political maritime boundaries for this semi-enclosed sea are incomplete. The agreed boundaries do not take into consideration the full potential of the legal continental shelves. Viewed against continental shelf issues, possible maritime boundary delimitations and the rights of states to engage in regional initiatives, it is apparent that the Russian submission has not prejudiced the rights of other states. Although the two functions are inherently related, the ability to delimit boundaries with adjacent and opposite states remains separate from the process undertaken by the CLCS.