Forced confession

''The teacher Ursula painfully tortured, whipped, beaten, and finally burned in Maastricht, AD 1570'' engraved by [[Jan Luyken A forced confession is a confession obtained from a suspect or a prisoner by means of torture (including enhanced interrogation techniques) or other forms of duress. Depending on the level of coercion used, a forced confession is not valid in revealing the truth. The individuals being interrogated may agree to the story presented to them or even make up falsehoods themselves in order to satisfy the interrogator and discontinue their suffering.

For centuries the Latin phrase "''Confessio est regina probationum''" (in English: "Confession is the queen of evidence") justified the use of forced confession in the European legal system. When especially during the Middle Ages acquiring a confession was the most important thing during preparations before a trial, than the method used to get the confession seemed irrelevant, de facto sanctioning the use of torture to extract forced confession.

By the late 18th century, most scholars and lawyers thought of the forced confession not only as a relic of past times and morally wrong but also ineffective as the victim of torture may confess to anything just to ease their suffering.

Developments in the 20th century, notably the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, greatly reduced the legal acceptance of forced confessions. However, for most of legal history they have been accepted in most of the world, and are still accepted in some jurisdictions. Provided by Wikipedia

Search Results

Showing 1 - 7 results of 7 for search 'Dahlin, Peter', query time: 0.05s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
Search Tools: Get RSS Feed