Search Results

Showing 821 - 840 results of 1,711 for search '"Roe deer"', query time: 1.86s Refine Results
  1. 821
    by Lindberg, Erik
    Published 2010
    ... in the hunting. Merged with the quantity of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) it gives a...
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  2. 822
    by Brazytė, Živilė
    Published 2013
    ... elaphus L.) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.)) distribution in modern methodss. Methods of study...
    Get access
    Get access
    Master Thesis
  3. 823
    by Vysinova, Lenka
    Published 2010
    ... in Sweden. The tested factors were: density of moose, roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red deer (Cervus...
    Get access
    Text
  4. 824
  5. 825
    ... and roe deer (P=1.0e-02, Bonferroni corrected), but not with foregut fermenters. The high proportion...
    Get access
    Get access
    Article in Journal/Newspaper
  6. 826
  7. 827
  8. 828
    .... There was no evidence of B. burgdorferi sl infection in moose (Alces alces), red deer (Cervus elaphus) or roe deer...
    Get access
    Get access
    Article in Journal/Newspaper
  9. 829
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  10. 830
    ... of natural browsing from an area where moose (Alces alces), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), fallow deer...
    Get access
    Get access
  11. 831
    by Tohver, Egle
    Published 2022
    ... at the beginning of the last decade with the decline of the number of roe deers. Although the population of roe...
    Get access
    Bachelor Thesis
  12. 832
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  13. 833
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  14. 834
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Dataset
  15. 835
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  16. 836
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  17. 837
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  18. 838
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  19. 839
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
  20. 840
    ...%) but not in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (97.2% vs. 90.4%) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) (82.8% vs. 64.9%). Of 11...
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
    Get access
Search Tools: Get RSS Feed