Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866

Figure 5 - NJ dendrogram based on K2P pairwise genetic distances. Values at nodes indicate the result of the bootstrap test (10.000 pseudo replicates). Only values ≥ 50 are shown. For Ammodytes tobianus (grey box) and Hyperoplus lanceolatus all analysed individuals are shown. In case of Ammodytes ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thiel, Ralf, Knebelsberger, Thomas
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2016
Subjects:
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Perciformes
Ammodytidae
Ammodytes
Ammodytes tobianusAnimalia
Gymnammodytes
Gymnammodytes cicerelusAnimalia
Hyperoplus
Hyperoplus lanceolatusAnimalia
Ammodytes marinusAnimalia
Hyperoplus immaculatus
COI
DNA barcoding
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
Hyperoplus lanceolatus
Northeast Atlantic
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure5
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:981577
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:981577 2024-09-15T18:11:18+00:00 Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866 Thiel, Ralf Knebelsberger, Thomas 2016-09-15 https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure5 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure5 oai:zenodo.org:981577 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Animalia Chordata Actinopterygii Perciformes Ammodytidae Ammodytes Ammodytes tobianusAnimalia Gymnammodytes Gymnammodytes cicerelusAnimalia Hyperoplus Hyperoplus lanceolatusAnimalia Ammodytes marinusAnimalia Hyperoplus immaculatus COI DNA barcoding meristic characters mitochondrial DNA morphology morphometrics northeast Atlantic nuclear gene Rhodopsin Sand lances species identification info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2016 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure510.3897/zookeys.617.8866 2024-07-26T18:37:04Z Figure 5 - NJ dendrogram based on K2P pairwise genetic distances. Values at nodes indicate the result of the bootstrap test (10.000 pseudo replicates). Only values ≥ 50 are shown. For Ammodytes tobianus (grey box) and Hyperoplus lanceolatus all analysed individuals are shown. In case of Ammodytes marinus and Hyperoplus immaculatus the number of specimens is given in brackets. Other/Unknown Material Hyperoplus lanceolatus Northeast Atlantic Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Perciformes
Ammodytidae
Ammodytes
Ammodytes tobianusAnimalia
Gymnammodytes
Gymnammodytes cicerelusAnimalia
Hyperoplus
Hyperoplus lanceolatusAnimalia
Ammodytes marinusAnimalia
Hyperoplus immaculatus
COI
DNA barcoding
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
spellingShingle Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Perciformes
Ammodytidae
Ammodytes
Ammodytes tobianusAnimalia
Gymnammodytes
Gymnammodytes cicerelusAnimalia
Hyperoplus
Hyperoplus lanceolatusAnimalia
Ammodytes marinusAnimalia
Hyperoplus immaculatus
COI
DNA barcoding
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
Thiel, Ralf
Knebelsberger, Thomas
Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
topic_facet Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Perciformes
Ammodytidae
Ammodytes
Ammodytes tobianusAnimalia
Gymnammodytes
Gymnammodytes cicerelusAnimalia
Hyperoplus
Hyperoplus lanceolatusAnimalia
Ammodytes marinusAnimalia
Hyperoplus immaculatus
COI
DNA barcoding
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
description Figure 5 - NJ dendrogram based on K2P pairwise genetic distances. Values at nodes indicate the result of the bootstrap test (10.000 pseudo replicates). Only values ≥ 50 are shown. For Ammodytes tobianus (grey box) and Hyperoplus lanceolatus all analysed individuals are shown. In case of Ammodytes marinus and Hyperoplus immaculatus the number of specimens is given in brackets.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Thiel, Ralf
Knebelsberger, Thomas
author_facet Thiel, Ralf
Knebelsberger, Thomas
author_sort Thiel, Ralf
title Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
title_short Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
title_full Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
title_fullStr Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
title_full_unstemmed Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
title_sort figure 5 from: thiel r, knebelsberger t (2016) how reliably can northeast atlantic sand lances of the genera ammodytes and hyperoplus be distinguished? a comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. zookeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure5
genre Hyperoplus lanceolatus
Northeast Atlantic
genre_facet Hyperoplus lanceolatus
Northeast Atlantic
op_relation https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure5
oai:zenodo.org:981577
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure510.3897/zookeys.617.8866
_version_ 1810448890148683776

Similar Items