Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model

In this paper we describe a waves-in-ice model (WIM), which calculates ice breakage and the wave radiation stress (WRS). This WIM is then coupled to the new sea-ice model neXtSIM, which is based on the elasto-brittle (EB) rheology. We highlight some numerical issues involved in the coupling and inve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Williams, T. D., Rampal, P., Bouillon, S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/887041
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:887041
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:887041 2023-06-06T11:59:09+02:00 Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model Williams, T. D. Rampal, P. Bouillon, S. 2017-09-07 https://zenodo.org/record/887041 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017 unknown info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/607476/ https://zenodo.org/record/887041 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017 oai:zenodo.org:887041 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode The Cryosphere 11(5) 2117-2135 info:eu-repo/semantics/article publication-article 2017 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017 2023-04-13T22:47:21Z In this paper we describe a waves-in-ice model (WIM), which calculates ice breakage and the wave radiation stress (WRS). This WIM is then coupled to the new sea-ice model neXtSIM, which is based on the elasto-brittle (EB) rheology. We highlight some numerical issues involved in the coupling and investigate the impact of the WRS, and of modifying the EB rheology to lower the stiffness of the ice in the area where the ice has broken up (the marginal ice zone or MIZ). In experiments in the absence of wind, we find that wind waves can produce noticeable movement of the ice edge in loose ice (concentration around 70 %) – up to 36 km, depending on the material parameters of the ice that are used and the dynamical model used for the broken ice. The ice edge position is unaffected by the WRS if the initial concentration is higher (≳ 0.9). Swell waves (monochromatic waves with low frequency) do not affect the ice edge location (even for loose ice), as they are attenuated much less than the higher-frequency components of a wind wave spectrum, and so consequently produce a much lower WRS (by about an order of magnitude at least).In the presence of wind, we find that the wind stress dominates the WRS, which, while large near the ice edge, decays exponentially away from it. This is in contrast to the wind stress, which is applied over a much larger ice area. In this case (when wind is present) the dynamical model for the MIZ has more impact than the WRS, although that effect too is relatively modest. When the stiffness in the MIZ is lowered due to ice breakage, we find that on-ice winds produce more compression in the MIZ than in the pack, while off-ice winds can cause the MIZ to be separated from the pack ice. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice The Cryosphere Zenodo The Cryosphere 11 5 2117 2135
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
description In this paper we describe a waves-in-ice model (WIM), which calculates ice breakage and the wave radiation stress (WRS). This WIM is then coupled to the new sea-ice model neXtSIM, which is based on the elasto-brittle (EB) rheology. We highlight some numerical issues involved in the coupling and investigate the impact of the WRS, and of modifying the EB rheology to lower the stiffness of the ice in the area where the ice has broken up (the marginal ice zone or MIZ). In experiments in the absence of wind, we find that wind waves can produce noticeable movement of the ice edge in loose ice (concentration around 70 %) – up to 36 km, depending on the material parameters of the ice that are used and the dynamical model used for the broken ice. The ice edge position is unaffected by the WRS if the initial concentration is higher (≳ 0.9). Swell waves (monochromatic waves with low frequency) do not affect the ice edge location (even for loose ice), as they are attenuated much less than the higher-frequency components of a wind wave spectrum, and so consequently produce a much lower WRS (by about an order of magnitude at least).In the presence of wind, we find that the wind stress dominates the WRS, which, while large near the ice edge, decays exponentially away from it. This is in contrast to the wind stress, which is applied over a much larger ice area. In this case (when wind is present) the dynamical model for the MIZ has more impact than the WRS, although that effect too is relatively modest. When the stiffness in the MIZ is lowered due to ice breakage, we find that on-ice winds produce more compression in the MIZ than in the pack, while off-ice winds can cause the MIZ to be separated from the pack ice.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Williams, T. D.
Rampal, P.
Bouillon, S.
spellingShingle Williams, T. D.
Rampal, P.
Bouillon, S.
Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model
author_facet Williams, T. D.
Rampal, P.
Bouillon, S.
author_sort Williams, T. D.
title Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model
title_short Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model
title_full Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model
title_fullStr Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model
title_full_unstemmed Wave–ice interactions in the neXtSIM sea-ice model
title_sort wave–ice interactions in the nextsim sea-ice model
publishDate 2017
url https://zenodo.org/record/887041
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017
genre Sea ice
The Cryosphere
genre_facet Sea ice
The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere 11(5) 2117-2135
op_relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/607476/
https://zenodo.org/record/887041
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017
oai:zenodo.org:887041
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2117-2017
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 11
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2117
op_container_end_page 2135
_version_ 1767948865389985792