Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!

So called 'flatspots' rarely have the appearance of flatness, even at proven gas and oil fields and on seismic data that has been converted to depth using best-practice methods. The appearance of fluid contacts on seismic reflection data is influenced by several controls, most notably, flu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jarrod Dunne, James Parsons
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2023
Subjects:
DHI
AvO
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955930
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7955930
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7955930 2024-09-15T18:32:58+00:00 Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'! Jarrod Dunne James Parsons 2023-03-15 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955930 eng eng Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/aseg_extended_abstracts_2023 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955929 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955930 oai:zenodo.org:7955930 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Extended Abstracts, Volume 2023, 4th Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Brisbane, 2023, (2023-03-15) AEGC, Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 15-17 March 2023 DHI flatspot quantitative interpretation AvO info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePaper 2023 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.795593010.5281/zenodo.7955929 2024-07-27T06:10:26Z So called 'flatspots' rarely have the appearance of flatness, even at proven gas and oil fields and on seismic data that has been converted to depth using best-practice methods. The appearance of fluid contacts on seismic reflection data is influenced by several controls, most notably, fluid type; burial depth; saturation; and the size of the 'flatspot' anomaly compared to the imaging velocity resolution. Many cases of non-flatness are caused by lateral velocity variation in the overburden. Often the structural form of the trap itself is the cause. Non-flat seismic hydrocarbon contacts are seen at shallow gas hazards in Sakhalin, Russia; at oil fields in the Santos Basin, Brazil; and at 'gas on oil' accumulations in the Browse Basin, Australia. So, it appears that non-flat 'flatspots' are ubiquitous, suggesting an urgent name change is needed for this form of DHI. The interpretation of DHIs is aided by a new 2D synthetic modelling method that characterizes the time-depth behaviour of a field or prospect simultaneously with its amplitude response. The software interactively models seismic cross-sections using rock physics or seismic velocities to compute AvO synthetics at significant layer boundaries. Hydrocarbon porefill effects can be modelled using Gassmann fluid substitution to modify the elastic properties within the proposed trap. DHIs are thus characterized at (1) the top of the trap; (2) the base of the trap (if base sealed); and (3) at the contacts between different fluid types, such as a gas/water contact; oil/water contact; or gas/oil contact. We propose a more representative terminology, referring to DHIs as either top reservoir indicators; base reservoir indicators or contact indicators, thus removing the rarely met implication that 'flatspots' ought to appear flat on a depth converted seismic section. Open-Access Online Publication: May 22, 2023 Conference Object Sakhalin Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language English
topic DHI
flatspot
quantitative interpretation
AvO
spellingShingle DHI
flatspot
quantitative interpretation
AvO
Jarrod Dunne
James Parsons
Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
topic_facet DHI
flatspot
quantitative interpretation
AvO
description So called 'flatspots' rarely have the appearance of flatness, even at proven gas and oil fields and on seismic data that has been converted to depth using best-practice methods. The appearance of fluid contacts on seismic reflection data is influenced by several controls, most notably, fluid type; burial depth; saturation; and the size of the 'flatspot' anomaly compared to the imaging velocity resolution. Many cases of non-flatness are caused by lateral velocity variation in the overburden. Often the structural form of the trap itself is the cause. Non-flat seismic hydrocarbon contacts are seen at shallow gas hazards in Sakhalin, Russia; at oil fields in the Santos Basin, Brazil; and at 'gas on oil' accumulations in the Browse Basin, Australia. So, it appears that non-flat 'flatspots' are ubiquitous, suggesting an urgent name change is needed for this form of DHI. The interpretation of DHIs is aided by a new 2D synthetic modelling method that characterizes the time-depth behaviour of a field or prospect simultaneously with its amplitude response. The software interactively models seismic cross-sections using rock physics or seismic velocities to compute AvO synthetics at significant layer boundaries. Hydrocarbon porefill effects can be modelled using Gassmann fluid substitution to modify the elastic properties within the proposed trap. DHIs are thus characterized at (1) the top of the trap; (2) the base of the trap (if base sealed); and (3) at the contacts between different fluid types, such as a gas/water contact; oil/water contact; or gas/oil contact. We propose a more representative terminology, referring to DHIs as either top reservoir indicators; base reservoir indicators or contact indicators, thus removing the rarely met implication that 'flatspots' ought to appear flat on a depth converted seismic section. Open-Access Online Publication: May 22, 2023
format Conference Object
author Jarrod Dunne
James Parsons
author_facet Jarrod Dunne
James Parsons
author_sort Jarrod Dunne
title Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
title_short Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
title_full Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
title_fullStr Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
title_full_unstemmed Direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
title_sort direct hydrocarbon indications from fluid contacts - stop calling them 'flatspots'!
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955930
genre Sakhalin
genre_facet Sakhalin
op_source Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Extended Abstracts, Volume 2023, 4th Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Brisbane, 2023, (2023-03-15)
AEGC, Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 15-17 March 2023
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/aseg_extended_abstracts_2023
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955929
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7955930
oai:zenodo.org:7955930
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.795593010.5281/zenodo.7955929
_version_ 1810474726375555072