Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece

Wolf (Canis lupus) populations have recovered and expanded across many parts of the world thanks to conservation efforts, including improved legal status and restoration of their prey. Concurrently, public concerns regarding the risk of wolf attacks on humans and livestock are increasing as wolves o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature Conservation
Main Authors: Iliopoulos, Yorgos, Astaras, Christos, Chatzimichail, Eirini
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7260020
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7260020 2024-09-15T18:01:28+00:00 Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece Iliopoulos, Yorgos Astaras, Christos Chatzimichail, Eirini 2022-10-20 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure3 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure4 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figures5-6 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure7 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure8 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure1 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure2 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915 oai:zenodo.org:7260020 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Nature Conservation, 50, 115-143, (2022-10-20) animal attacks on humans forensic analysis large carnivores livestock guarding dogs multidisciplinary approach wolf info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2022 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.8191510.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure310.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure410.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figures5-610.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure710.3897/natureconservation.50 2024-07-26T19:29:24Z Wolf (Canis lupus) populations have recovered and expanded across many parts of the world thanks to conservation efforts, including improved legal status and restoration of their prey. Concurrently, public concerns regarding the risk of wolf attacks on humans and livestock are increasing as wolves occupy human-dominated landscapes. We examined a unique case in Europe allegedly involving wolves in the death of a female British tourist, aged 64, in northern Greece in September 2017. This incident received extensive international media attention and yet many fundamental details of the case area are lacking, including whether local livestock guarding dogs played a role. To assist in resolving the case, we conducted an extensive literature review which documented 13 criteria linked to the risk of either a wolf and/or a dog attacking a human. We also conducted a camera trap survey (October to December 2017) soon after the fatal attack to calculate the activity overlap among humans, dogs and wolves. Sufficient data were available for assessing 11 of the 13 criteria. For the remaining two, the required data were either not analysed (i.e. canid DNA collected from the attack site), not appropriately collected (i.e. DNA from the mouths of suspected dogs) or were collected, but misinterpreted (i.e. the post-consumption patterns of the victim's corpse). Via this combination of evidence, we conclude that this case involved a fatal dog attack. This assertion is supported by evidence such as the: a) high dog-human activity overlap at the attack site which peaked during the attack time as opposed to near zero wolf-human activity overlap at the same time, b) presence of a large pack of unsupervised dogs, c) high ratio of male dogs in the dog pack, d) close vicinity of the attack site to dog owner's property and e) previous documented aggression of these dogs towards humans. The consumption patterns, time scale and location of the victim's remains indicate a posthumous consumption of the corpse possibly by the same dogs and/or by ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Zenodo Nature Conservation 50 115 143
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic animal attacks on humans
forensic analysis
large carnivores
livestock guarding dogs
multidisciplinary approach
wolf
spellingShingle animal attacks on humans
forensic analysis
large carnivores
livestock guarding dogs
multidisciplinary approach
wolf
Iliopoulos, Yorgos
Astaras, Christos
Chatzimichail, Eirini
Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece
topic_facet animal attacks on humans
forensic analysis
large carnivores
livestock guarding dogs
multidisciplinary approach
wolf
description Wolf (Canis lupus) populations have recovered and expanded across many parts of the world thanks to conservation efforts, including improved legal status and restoration of their prey. Concurrently, public concerns regarding the risk of wolf attacks on humans and livestock are increasing as wolves occupy human-dominated landscapes. We examined a unique case in Europe allegedly involving wolves in the death of a female British tourist, aged 64, in northern Greece in September 2017. This incident received extensive international media attention and yet many fundamental details of the case area are lacking, including whether local livestock guarding dogs played a role. To assist in resolving the case, we conducted an extensive literature review which documented 13 criteria linked to the risk of either a wolf and/or a dog attacking a human. We also conducted a camera trap survey (October to December 2017) soon after the fatal attack to calculate the activity overlap among humans, dogs and wolves. Sufficient data were available for assessing 11 of the 13 criteria. For the remaining two, the required data were either not analysed (i.e. canid DNA collected from the attack site), not appropriately collected (i.e. DNA from the mouths of suspected dogs) or were collected, but misinterpreted (i.e. the post-consumption patterns of the victim's corpse). Via this combination of evidence, we conclude that this case involved a fatal dog attack. This assertion is supported by evidence such as the: a) high dog-human activity overlap at the attack site which peaked during the attack time as opposed to near zero wolf-human activity overlap at the same time, b) presence of a large pack of unsupervised dogs, c) high ratio of male dogs in the dog pack, d) close vicinity of the attack site to dog owner's property and e) previous documented aggression of these dogs towards humans. The consumption patterns, time scale and location of the victim's remains indicate a posthumous consumption of the corpse possibly by the same dogs and/or by ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Iliopoulos, Yorgos
Astaras, Christos
Chatzimichail, Eirini
author_facet Iliopoulos, Yorgos
Astaras, Christos
Chatzimichail, Eirini
author_sort Iliopoulos, Yorgos
title Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece
title_short Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece
title_full Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece
title_fullStr Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece
title_full_unstemmed Dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a British tourist in northern Greece
title_sort dogs, not wolves, most likely to have caused the death of a british tourist in northern greece
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Nature Conservation, 50, 115-143, (2022-10-20)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure3
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure4
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figures5-6
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure7
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure8
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure1
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure2
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.81915
oai:zenodo.org:7260020
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.8191510.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure310.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure410.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figures5-610.3897/natureconservation.50.81915.figure710.3897/natureconservation.50
container_title Nature Conservation
container_volume 50
container_start_page 115
op_container_end_page 143
_version_ 1810438620602957824