Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS

Climate warming has important effects on Arctic vegetation, but the roles of Arctic vegetation as a carbon sink or source in the future remain largely unknown. In this study, we selected the tundra and needle leaf forest areas in Alaska to examine vegetation growth and carbon exchange using the LPJ-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wu, Xiaodong
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/7221164
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7221164
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7221164 2023-05-15T14:59:17+02:00 Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS Wu, Xiaodong 2022-10-18 https://zenodo.org/record/7221164 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451 unknown https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://zenodo.org/record/7221164 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451 oai:zenodo.org:7221164 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode info:eu-repo/semantics/other dataset 2022 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451 2023-03-11T01:25:51Z Climate warming has important effects on Arctic vegetation, but the roles of Arctic vegetation as a carbon sink or source in the future remain largely unknown. In this study, we selected the tundra and needle leaf forest areas in Alaska to examine vegetation growth and carbon exchange using the LPJ-GUESS model. We used flux site data to verify the accuracy of GPP and NEE simulated with climate variables, then simulated GPP and NEE from 1992 to 2014 and GPP and NEE from 2020 to 2100 under different climate scenarios, and compared the GPP and LAI simulated by the model with those under future scenarios. We used LPJ-GUESS model to explore the importance of climate variables on GPP and NEE. Funding provided by: The National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809Award Number: 41941015 Datasets include: - Precipitation changes in the future - Temperature changes in the future - Solar radiation changes in the future - Simulated and observed NEE and GPP - Monthly NEE and GPP - Changes in NEE and GPP from 1992 to 2014 - Changes in NEE and GPP from 2020 to 2100 - Comparison of GPP value between model simulation and ESM output - Comparison of LAI value between model simulation and ESM output - Changes in NEE and GPP from 2020 to 2100 by re-driving in ATQ - Changes in NEE and GPP from 2020 to 2100 by re-driving in PRR Dataset Arctic Tundra Alaska Zenodo Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
description Climate warming has important effects on Arctic vegetation, but the roles of Arctic vegetation as a carbon sink or source in the future remain largely unknown. In this study, we selected the tundra and needle leaf forest areas in Alaska to examine vegetation growth and carbon exchange using the LPJ-GUESS model. We used flux site data to verify the accuracy of GPP and NEE simulated with climate variables, then simulated GPP and NEE from 1992 to 2014 and GPP and NEE from 2020 to 2100 under different climate scenarios, and compared the GPP and LAI simulated by the model with those under future scenarios. We used LPJ-GUESS model to explore the importance of climate variables on GPP and NEE. Funding provided by: The National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809Award Number: 41941015 Datasets include: - Precipitation changes in the future - Temperature changes in the future - Solar radiation changes in the future - Simulated and observed NEE and GPP - Monthly NEE and GPP - Changes in NEE and GPP from 1992 to 2014 - Changes in NEE and GPP from 2020 to 2100 - Comparison of GPP value between model simulation and ESM output - Comparison of LAI value between model simulation and ESM output - Changes in NEE and GPP from 2020 to 2100 by re-driving in ATQ - Changes in NEE and GPP from 2020 to 2100 by re-driving in PRR
format Dataset
author Wu, Xiaodong
spellingShingle Wu, Xiaodong
Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS
author_facet Wu, Xiaodong
author_sort Wu, Xiaodong
title Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS
title_short Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS
title_full Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS
title_fullStr Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS
title_full_unstemmed Climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: Simulation of Alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using LPJ-GUESS
title_sort climate warming benefits plant growth but net carbon uptake: simulation of alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using lpj-guess
publishDate 2022
url https://zenodo.org/record/7221164
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
Alaska
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad
https://zenodo.org/record/7221164
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451
oai:zenodo.org:7221164
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj451
_version_ 1766331400499232768