Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?

Abstract: In North Pole, Alaska, the chemical compound sulfolane has contaminated groundwater in a plume nearly 3.5 miles long, impacting homes using private well water systems. Sulfolane has also been detected in vegetables that were grown in contaminated soils in residents’ gardens. The groundwate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Janice Westlind
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2022
Subjects:
EPA
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052415
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7052415
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7052415 2024-09-15T18:24:53+00:00 Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem? Janice Westlind 2022-09-06 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052415 eng eng Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052414 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052415 oai:zenodo.org:7052415 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode North Pole sulfolane Flint Hills Refinery EPA Safe Drinking Water Act Moose Creek DWPP Williams Alaska Petroleum ADEC TERA National Toxicology Program Source Water Protection Plan info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2022 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.705241510.5281/zenodo.7052414 2024-07-26T03:52:00Z Abstract: In North Pole, Alaska, the chemical compound sulfolane has contaminated groundwater in a plume nearly 3.5 miles long, impacting homes using private well water systems. Sulfolane has also been detected in vegetables that were grown in contaminated soils in residents’ gardens. The groundwater plume can be found above and below a layer of permafrost. Remediation of sulfolane can be accomplished by aerating water and soil; however, it is difficult and costly to reach the groundwater that lies beneath the permafrost, where sulfolane remains trapped in some areas. Private wells that are used by residents and businesses have been affected; currently, only buildings within the small boundaries of the city limits are on a public water utility system. Ultimately, the State of Alaska has the responsibility to correct the contamination and ensure clean water for residents. What is an acceptable limit for this contaminant in drinking water when there has been no precedent for such a spill? Evaluation and correction of the situation continues with assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. A pending study of health precautions will be released by EPA in 2019. Other/Unknown Material North Pole permafrost Alaska Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language English
topic North Pole
sulfolane
Flint Hills Refinery
EPA
Safe Drinking Water Act
Moose Creek
DWPP
Williams Alaska Petroleum
ADEC
TERA
National Toxicology Program
Source Water Protection Plan
spellingShingle North Pole
sulfolane
Flint Hills Refinery
EPA
Safe Drinking Water Act
Moose Creek
DWPP
Williams Alaska Petroleum
ADEC
TERA
National Toxicology Program
Source Water Protection Plan
Janice Westlind
Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?
topic_facet North Pole
sulfolane
Flint Hills Refinery
EPA
Safe Drinking Water Act
Moose Creek
DWPP
Williams Alaska Petroleum
ADEC
TERA
National Toxicology Program
Source Water Protection Plan
description Abstract: In North Pole, Alaska, the chemical compound sulfolane has contaminated groundwater in a plume nearly 3.5 miles long, impacting homes using private well water systems. Sulfolane has also been detected in vegetables that were grown in contaminated soils in residents’ gardens. The groundwater plume can be found above and below a layer of permafrost. Remediation of sulfolane can be accomplished by aerating water and soil; however, it is difficult and costly to reach the groundwater that lies beneath the permafrost, where sulfolane remains trapped in some areas. Private wells that are used by residents and businesses have been affected; currently, only buildings within the small boundaries of the city limits are on a public water utility system. Ultimately, the State of Alaska has the responsibility to correct the contamination and ensure clean water for residents. What is an acceptable limit for this contaminant in drinking water when there has been no precedent for such a spill? Evaluation and correction of the situation continues with assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. A pending study of health precautions will be released by EPA in 2019.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Janice Westlind
author_facet Janice Westlind
author_sort Janice Westlind
title Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?
title_short Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?
title_full Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?
title_fullStr Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?
title_full_unstemmed Sulfolane Contamination in North Pole, Alaska: Can Government Fix the Problem?
title_sort sulfolane contamination in north pole, alaska: can government fix the problem?
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052415
genre North Pole
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet North Pole
permafrost
Alaska
op_relation https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052414
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7052415
oai:zenodo.org:7052415
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.705241510.5281/zenodo.7052414
_version_ 1810465291136663552