Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations

To understand the quality of the existing observing system in the Arctic to capture important elements of change over the Arctic we performed a gap analysis with respect to the Arctic Ocean, the Arctic atmosphere and the high-latitude carbon-monitoring network. The main points of the findings are: 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stammer, Detlef, Lyu, Guokun, Pirazzini, Roberta, Naakka, Tuomas, Nygård, Tiina, Vihma, Timo, Pallandt, Martijn, Goeckede, Mathias, Reum, Friedemann
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051084
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7051084
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:7051084 2024-09-15T17:53:27+00:00 Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations Stammer, Detlef Lyu, Guokun Pirazzini, Roberta Naakka, Tuomas Nygård, Tiina Vihma, Timo Pallandt, Martijn Goeckede, Mathias Reum, Friedemann 2018-12-03 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051084 eng eng Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/intaros-h2020 https://zenodo.org/communities/eu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051083 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051084 oai:zenodo.org:7051084 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Arctic INTAROS Ocean Observing Systems Atmosphere Observing Systems Observations Sensitivity Greeen House Gas Observing Systems Gap Analysis info:eu-repo/semantics/report 2018 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.705108410.5281/zenodo.7051083 2024-07-25T11:18:36Z To understand the quality of the existing observing system in the Arctic to capture important elements of change over the Arctic we performed a gap analysis with respect to the Arctic Ocean, the Arctic atmosphere and the high-latitude carbon-monitoring network. The main points of the findings are: 1) The ocean observing system: The satellite altimeter system is a critical system to monitor the high-frequency variability. Due to the presence of sea ice in winter time, most of the area can be observed only every 5-10 days, leading to large observing gaps. Closing the gap can be done with new arrays of bottom pressure sensor ssuch as tide gauges or moorings in the ocean bottom. In addition, high-frequency transport measurements are required in the Fram, Davis Straights, the Barents Sea Opening, and north of the Laptev Sea. On the seasonal cycle, bottom pressure observations from GRACE are required to monitor the mass related variability and sea-ice observations are crucial for monitoring the halosteric related variability. On decadal time scales,it is important to have a sufficient hydrographic observing component capable of capturing temperature and salinity changes over the entire Arctic Ocean from the surface to the bottom. New algorithms that can recover sea level from sea ice covered areas may help to improve current satellite altimeter systems,and to improve the ability to monitor the Beaufort Gyre. 2) The atmosphere observing system: The density of the existing radiosonde observation network is not the most critical factor for the quality of T850 forecast. Instead,the results pointed out that stations on small islands in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean are critical for the quality of analysis. The Central Arctic Ocean and the Northern North-Atlantic would prob-ably benefit most from new sounding stations. Efforts to improve the quality of radiosonde observations, especially in Russia, would be very beneficial for the quality of T850 forecasts in the Arctic and sub-Arctic. Current data assimilation systems ... Report Arctic Ocean Barents Sea laptev Laptev Sea North Atlantic Sea ice ice covered areas Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language English
topic Arctic
INTAROS
Ocean Observing Systems
Atmosphere Observing Systems
Observations
Sensitivity
Greeen House Gas Observing Systems
Gap Analysis
spellingShingle Arctic
INTAROS
Ocean Observing Systems
Atmosphere Observing Systems
Observations
Sensitivity
Greeen House Gas Observing Systems
Gap Analysis
Stammer, Detlef
Lyu, Guokun
Pirazzini, Roberta
Naakka, Tuomas
Nygård, Tiina
Vihma, Timo
Pallandt, Martijn
Goeckede, Mathias
Reum, Friedemann
Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
topic_facet Arctic
INTAROS
Ocean Observing Systems
Atmosphere Observing Systems
Observations
Sensitivity
Greeen House Gas Observing Systems
Gap Analysis
description To understand the quality of the existing observing system in the Arctic to capture important elements of change over the Arctic we performed a gap analysis with respect to the Arctic Ocean, the Arctic atmosphere and the high-latitude carbon-monitoring network. The main points of the findings are: 1) The ocean observing system: The satellite altimeter system is a critical system to monitor the high-frequency variability. Due to the presence of sea ice in winter time, most of the area can be observed only every 5-10 days, leading to large observing gaps. Closing the gap can be done with new arrays of bottom pressure sensor ssuch as tide gauges or moorings in the ocean bottom. In addition, high-frequency transport measurements are required in the Fram, Davis Straights, the Barents Sea Opening, and north of the Laptev Sea. On the seasonal cycle, bottom pressure observations from GRACE are required to monitor the mass related variability and sea-ice observations are crucial for monitoring the halosteric related variability. On decadal time scales,it is important to have a sufficient hydrographic observing component capable of capturing temperature and salinity changes over the entire Arctic Ocean from the surface to the bottom. New algorithms that can recover sea level from sea ice covered areas may help to improve current satellite altimeter systems,and to improve the ability to monitor the Beaufort Gyre. 2) The atmosphere observing system: The density of the existing radiosonde observation network is not the most critical factor for the quality of T850 forecast. Instead,the results pointed out that stations on small islands in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean are critical for the quality of analysis. The Central Arctic Ocean and the Northern North-Atlantic would prob-ably benefit most from new sounding stations. Efforts to improve the quality of radiosonde observations, especially in Russia, would be very beneficial for the quality of T850 forecasts in the Arctic and sub-Arctic. Current data assimilation systems ...
format Report
author Stammer, Detlef
Lyu, Guokun
Pirazzini, Roberta
Naakka, Tuomas
Nygård, Tiina
Vihma, Timo
Pallandt, Martijn
Goeckede, Mathias
Reum, Friedemann
author_facet Stammer, Detlef
Lyu, Guokun
Pirazzini, Roberta
Naakka, Tuomas
Nygård, Tiina
Vihma, Timo
Pallandt, Martijn
Goeckede, Mathias
Reum, Friedemann
author_sort Stammer, Detlef
title Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
title_short Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
title_full Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
title_fullStr Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
title_full_unstemmed Deliverable 2.12 Observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
title_sort deliverable 2.12 observational gaps revealed by model sensitivity to observations
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051084
genre Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
laptev
Laptev Sea
North Atlantic
Sea ice
ice covered areas
genre_facet Arctic Ocean
Barents Sea
laptev
Laptev Sea
North Atlantic
Sea ice
ice covered areas
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/intaros-h2020
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051083
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7051084
oai:zenodo.org:7051084
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.705108410.5281/zenodo.7051083
_version_ 1810295557573312512