Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report

The aim of the INTAROS Revised Requirement Report has been to: Capitalise on INTAROS achievements Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables Address gaps in the present observing sys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buch, Erik, Pirazzini, Roberta, Tjernström, Michael, Danielsen, Finn, Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka, Ottersen, Geir, Sørensen, Mathilde B., Voss, Peter H., Solgaard, Anne, Sandven, Stein, Soltwedel, Thomas, Quegan, Shaun, Asmi, Eija
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:6607037
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:6607037 2024-09-09T19:24:08+00:00 Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report Buch, Erik Pirazzini, Roberta Tjernström, Michael Danielsen, Finn Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka Ottersen, Geir Sørensen, Mathilde B. Voss, Peter H. Solgaard, Anne Sandven, Stein Soltwedel, Thomas Quegan, Shaun Asmi, Eija 2021-09-30 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 eng eng Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/intaros-h2020 https://zenodo.org/communities/eu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607036 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 oai:zenodo.org:6607037 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Requirements In situ Observing systems Community Based Monitoring info:eu-repo/semantics/report 2021 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.660703710.5281/zenodo.6607036 2024-07-26T07:28:17Z The aim of the INTAROS Revised Requirement Report has been to: Capitalise on INTAROS achievements Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables Address gaps in the present observing system Requirements for in situ observations address resolution in space and time, quality and timeliness. Users of data generally have clearly articulated needs for time resolution, quality and timeliness, while defining the spatial resolution gives rise to serious considerations because: There is a need to find a balance between what ideally would be “nice to have” and what is feasible to achieve from a technical, logistic and especially economic point of view There is still a debate among scientists on how to address the spatial resolution: A gridded format with fixed horizontal and vertical distances between observation points Identifying key location with great impact and representativeness Requirements for atmospheric, ocean and land essential variables has been identified and discussed using the WMO OSCAR and Copernicus Systems – both using a gridded approach – as a baseline for a critical review. The performed gap analysis points to severe lack of observations in general and in the central Arctic in particular, and lack of sustainability since a majority of observations are based on time-limited campaigns. Additionally, there is a need for investments in developments of observation technology, incl. data communication and data management The performed requirement and gap analysis results in the following recommendations: Ensure work towards a robustly substantiated definition of spatial resolution in an Arctic observing system involving analytic tools such as numerical models (OSE’s and OSSE’s), cost and feasibility studies Establish an international coordination and governance structure involving nations, SAON, WMO, IOC, EU Copernicus,, and representatives of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communitiesto: Ensure a ... Report Arctic Zenodo Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language English
topic Requirements
In situ Observing systems
Community Based Monitoring
spellingShingle Requirements
In situ Observing systems
Community Based Monitoring
Buch, Erik
Pirazzini, Roberta
Tjernström, Michael
Danielsen, Finn
Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka
Ottersen, Geir
Sørensen, Mathilde B.
Voss, Peter H.
Solgaard, Anne
Sandven, Stein
Soltwedel, Thomas
Quegan, Shaun
Asmi, Eija
Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
topic_facet Requirements
In situ Observing systems
Community Based Monitoring
description The aim of the INTAROS Revised Requirement Report has been to: Capitalise on INTAROS achievements Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables Address gaps in the present observing system Requirements for in situ observations address resolution in space and time, quality and timeliness. Users of data generally have clearly articulated needs for time resolution, quality and timeliness, while defining the spatial resolution gives rise to serious considerations because: There is a need to find a balance between what ideally would be “nice to have” and what is feasible to achieve from a technical, logistic and especially economic point of view There is still a debate among scientists on how to address the spatial resolution: A gridded format with fixed horizontal and vertical distances between observation points Identifying key location with great impact and representativeness Requirements for atmospheric, ocean and land essential variables has been identified and discussed using the WMO OSCAR and Copernicus Systems – both using a gridded approach – as a baseline for a critical review. The performed gap analysis points to severe lack of observations in general and in the central Arctic in particular, and lack of sustainability since a majority of observations are based on time-limited campaigns. Additionally, there is a need for investments in developments of observation technology, incl. data communication and data management The performed requirement and gap analysis results in the following recommendations: Ensure work towards a robustly substantiated definition of spatial resolution in an Arctic observing system involving analytic tools such as numerical models (OSE’s and OSSE’s), cost and feasibility studies Establish an international coordination and governance structure involving nations, SAON, WMO, IOC, EU Copernicus,, and representatives of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communitiesto: Ensure a ...
format Report
author Buch, Erik
Pirazzini, Roberta
Tjernström, Michael
Danielsen, Finn
Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka
Ottersen, Geir
Sørensen, Mathilde B.
Voss, Peter H.
Solgaard, Anne
Sandven, Stein
Soltwedel, Thomas
Quegan, Shaun
Asmi, Eija
author_facet Buch, Erik
Pirazzini, Roberta
Tjernström, Michael
Danielsen, Finn
Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka
Ottersen, Geir
Sørensen, Mathilde B.
Voss, Peter H.
Solgaard, Anne
Sandven, Stein
Soltwedel, Thomas
Quegan, Shaun
Asmi, Eija
author_sort Buch, Erik
title Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
title_short Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
title_full Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
title_fullStr Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
title_full_unstemmed Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
title_sort deliverable 1.9 intaros revised requirement report
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/intaros-h2020
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607036
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037
oai:zenodo.org:6607037
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.660703710.5281/zenodo.6607036
_version_ 1809894068750123008