Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report
The aim of the INTAROS Revised Requirement Report has been to: Capitalise on INTAROS achievements Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables Address gaps in the present observing sys...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Zenodo
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:6607037 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:6607037 2024-09-09T19:24:08+00:00 Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report Buch, Erik Pirazzini, Roberta Tjernström, Michael Danielsen, Finn Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka Ottersen, Geir Sørensen, Mathilde B. Voss, Peter H. Solgaard, Anne Sandven, Stein Soltwedel, Thomas Quegan, Shaun Asmi, Eija 2021-09-30 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 eng eng Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/intaros-h2020 https://zenodo.org/communities/eu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607036 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 oai:zenodo.org:6607037 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Requirements In situ Observing systems Community Based Monitoring info:eu-repo/semantics/report 2021 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.660703710.5281/zenodo.6607036 2024-07-26T07:28:17Z The aim of the INTAROS Revised Requirement Report has been to: Capitalise on INTAROS achievements Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables Address gaps in the present observing system Requirements for in situ observations address resolution in space and time, quality and timeliness. Users of data generally have clearly articulated needs for time resolution, quality and timeliness, while defining the spatial resolution gives rise to serious considerations because: There is a need to find a balance between what ideally would be “nice to have” and what is feasible to achieve from a technical, logistic and especially economic point of view There is still a debate among scientists on how to address the spatial resolution: A gridded format with fixed horizontal and vertical distances between observation points Identifying key location with great impact and representativeness Requirements for atmospheric, ocean and land essential variables has been identified and discussed using the WMO OSCAR and Copernicus Systems – both using a gridded approach – as a baseline for a critical review. The performed gap analysis points to severe lack of observations in general and in the central Arctic in particular, and lack of sustainability since a majority of observations are based on time-limited campaigns. Additionally, there is a need for investments in developments of observation technology, incl. data communication and data management The performed requirement and gap analysis results in the following recommendations: Ensure work towards a robustly substantiated definition of spatial resolution in an Arctic observing system involving analytic tools such as numerical models (OSE’s and OSSE’s), cost and feasibility studies Establish an international coordination and governance structure involving nations, SAON, WMO, IOC, EU Copernicus,, and representatives of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communitiesto: Ensure a ... Report Arctic Zenodo Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
English |
topic |
Requirements In situ Observing systems Community Based Monitoring |
spellingShingle |
Requirements In situ Observing systems Community Based Monitoring Buch, Erik Pirazzini, Roberta Tjernström, Michael Danielsen, Finn Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka Ottersen, Geir Sørensen, Mathilde B. Voss, Peter H. Solgaard, Anne Sandven, Stein Soltwedel, Thomas Quegan, Shaun Asmi, Eija Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report |
topic_facet |
Requirements In situ Observing systems Community Based Monitoring |
description |
The aim of the INTAROS Revised Requirement Report has been to: Capitalise on INTAROS achievements Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables Address gaps in the present observing system Requirements for in situ observations address resolution in space and time, quality and timeliness. Users of data generally have clearly articulated needs for time resolution, quality and timeliness, while defining the spatial resolution gives rise to serious considerations because: There is a need to find a balance between what ideally would be “nice to have” and what is feasible to achieve from a technical, logistic and especially economic point of view There is still a debate among scientists on how to address the spatial resolution: A gridded format with fixed horizontal and vertical distances between observation points Identifying key location with great impact and representativeness Requirements for atmospheric, ocean and land essential variables has been identified and discussed using the WMO OSCAR and Copernicus Systems – both using a gridded approach – as a baseline for a critical review. The performed gap analysis points to severe lack of observations in general and in the central Arctic in particular, and lack of sustainability since a majority of observations are based on time-limited campaigns. Additionally, there is a need for investments in developments of observation technology, incl. data communication and data management The performed requirement and gap analysis results in the following recommendations: Ensure work towards a robustly substantiated definition of spatial resolution in an Arctic observing system involving analytic tools such as numerical models (OSE’s and OSSE’s), cost and feasibility studies Establish an international coordination and governance structure involving nations, SAON, WMO, IOC, EU Copernicus,, and representatives of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communitiesto: Ensure a ... |
format |
Report |
author |
Buch, Erik Pirazzini, Roberta Tjernström, Michael Danielsen, Finn Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka Ottersen, Geir Sørensen, Mathilde B. Voss, Peter H. Solgaard, Anne Sandven, Stein Soltwedel, Thomas Quegan, Shaun Asmi, Eija |
author_facet |
Buch, Erik Pirazzini, Roberta Tjernström, Michael Danielsen, Finn Beszczynska-Møller, Agnieszka Ottersen, Geir Sørensen, Mathilde B. Voss, Peter H. Solgaard, Anne Sandven, Stein Soltwedel, Thomas Quegan, Shaun Asmi, Eija |
author_sort |
Buch, Erik |
title |
Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report |
title_short |
Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report |
title_full |
Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report |
title_fullStr |
Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deliverable 1.9 INTAROS Revised Requirement Report |
title_sort |
deliverable 1.9 intaros revised requirement report |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_relation |
https://zenodo.org/communities/intaros-h2020 https://zenodo.org/communities/eu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607036 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6607037 oai:zenodo.org:6607037 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.660703710.5281/zenodo.6607036 |
_version_ |
1809894068750123008 |