RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report

The aim of this report is to analyse the gender+ inequality dimensions and the impacts that policies and societal responses implemented in Europeas a response to COVID-19 have had on people, to give voice to those people and groups who may not have been heard in the public debate, and to identify en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandström, Lina, Axelsson, Tobias K., Callerstig, Anne-Charlott, Strid, Sofia, Bobek, Alicja
Other Authors: Detsis, Emmanuel
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517795
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:6517795
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:6517795 2024-09-15T18:14:38+00:00 RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report Sandström, Lina Axelsson, Tobias K. Callerstig, Anne-Charlott Strid, Sofia Bobek, Alicja Detsis, Emmanuel 2022-05-04 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517795 unknown Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/resistire https://zenodo.org/communities/eu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517794 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517795 oai:zenodo.org:6517795 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode COVID-19 intersectionality gender+ qualitative analysis qualitative methodology LGBTQI+ vulnerabilities policy responses info:eu-repo/semantics/report 2022 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.651779510.5281/zenodo.6517794 2024-07-26T23:03:19Z The aim of this report is to analyse the gender+ inequality dimensions and the impacts that policies and societal responses implemented in Europeas a response to COVID-19 have had on people, to give voice to those people and groups who may not have been heard in the public debate, and to identify enablers and obstacles towards recovery, with a specific focus on four domains: gender-based violence, education, work and care; and with a specific focus on vulnerable groups, including: LGBTQI+, migrants, young people. The report is based on three methods of qualitative data collection: pan-European workshops, expert interviews and narrative interviews. The material is extensive; all in all it includes 368 individuals, who generously shared their knowledge and experiences as activists and experts in civil society, public authorities and academia, and as individuals with lived experiences during COVID-19 across Europe. The data were collected via three pan-European workshops with inequality experts from civil society representing the voices of specific target groups, public authority experts and academics (n=38); semi-structured interviews with predominantly public authority experts and academics (n=24); and via individual narrative interviews with people from across Europe (n=306) and analysed using thematic analysis. The workshops addressed the domains gender-based violence, work, and education. The semi-structured interviews collected data from the national level in the same domains, as well as the care domain. The narrative interviews were conducted and analysed bythe consortium partners and a network of 21national researchers covering theEU27, Iceland, Serbia, Turkey, and theUK. In line with the theoretical and conceptual approach of RESISTIRÉ, the report builds on an intersectional approach to gender which acknowledges the mutual shaping of multiple complex inequalities. Based on the research agenda produced in the first cycle, the analysis also draws on concepts of unintended consequences, resilience, recovery ... Report Iceland Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic COVID-19
intersectionality
gender+
qualitative analysis
qualitative methodology
LGBTQI+
vulnerabilities
policy responses
spellingShingle COVID-19
intersectionality
gender+
qualitative analysis
qualitative methodology
LGBTQI+
vulnerabilities
policy responses
Sandström, Lina
Axelsson, Tobias K.
Callerstig, Anne-Charlott
Strid, Sofia
Bobek, Alicja
RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report
topic_facet COVID-19
intersectionality
gender+
qualitative analysis
qualitative methodology
LGBTQI+
vulnerabilities
policy responses
description The aim of this report is to analyse the gender+ inequality dimensions and the impacts that policies and societal responses implemented in Europeas a response to COVID-19 have had on people, to give voice to those people and groups who may not have been heard in the public debate, and to identify enablers and obstacles towards recovery, with a specific focus on four domains: gender-based violence, education, work and care; and with a specific focus on vulnerable groups, including: LGBTQI+, migrants, young people. The report is based on three methods of qualitative data collection: pan-European workshops, expert interviews and narrative interviews. The material is extensive; all in all it includes 368 individuals, who generously shared their knowledge and experiences as activists and experts in civil society, public authorities and academia, and as individuals with lived experiences during COVID-19 across Europe. The data were collected via three pan-European workshops with inequality experts from civil society representing the voices of specific target groups, public authority experts and academics (n=38); semi-structured interviews with predominantly public authority experts and academics (n=24); and via individual narrative interviews with people from across Europe (n=306) and analysed using thematic analysis. The workshops addressed the domains gender-based violence, work, and education. The semi-structured interviews collected data from the national level in the same domains, as well as the care domain. The narrative interviews were conducted and analysed bythe consortium partners and a network of 21national researchers covering theEU27, Iceland, Serbia, Turkey, and theUK. In line with the theoretical and conceptual approach of RESISTIRÉ, the report builds on an intersectional approach to gender which acknowledges the mutual shaping of multiple complex inequalities. Based on the research agenda produced in the first cycle, the analysis also draws on concepts of unintended consequences, resilience, recovery ...
author2 Detsis, Emmanuel
format Report
author Sandström, Lina
Axelsson, Tobias K.
Callerstig, Anne-Charlott
Strid, Sofia
Bobek, Alicja
author_facet Sandström, Lina
Axelsson, Tobias K.
Callerstig, Anne-Charlott
Strid, Sofia
Bobek, Alicja
author_sort Sandström, Lina
title RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report
title_short RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report
title_full RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report
title_fullStr RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report
title_full_unstemmed RESISTIRE D4.2 Building back better? Qualitative indications of inequalities produced by Covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. Second cycle summary report
title_sort resistire d4.2 building back better? qualitative indications of inequalities produced by covid-19 and its policy and societal responses. second cycle summary report
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517795
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/resistire
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517794
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6517795
oai:zenodo.org:6517795
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.651779510.5281/zenodo.6517794
_version_ 1810452406032400384