Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland
Despite global, regional, and national policy efforts, biodiversity is on the decline worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to explore the critically important institutional and social features of those economic instruments that in practice motivate beneficiaries and stakeholders to protect biodiv...
Published in: | Nature Conservation |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:575262 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:575262 2024-09-15T18:41:33+00:00 Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland Hiedanpää, Juha Borgström, Suvi 2014-07-23 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 unknown Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 oai:zenodo.org:575262 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Nature Conservation, 7, 29-50, (2014-07-23) Environmental law Institutional economics Biodiversity conservation Economic instruments: Payments for ecosystem services Pragmatism info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2014 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 2024-07-27T03:45:47Z Despite global, regional, and national policy efforts, biodiversity is on the decline worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to explore the critically important institutional and social features of those economic instruments that in practice motivate beneficiaries and stakeholders to protect biodiversity. The paper presents two case studies: the natural values trading (NVT) scheme in southwestern Finland and the protection of the golden eagle ( Aquila chrysaetos ) in Finnish Lapland. NVT builds upon the voluntary actions of landowners, payments for ecosystem services, and a fixed-term period of protection (ten years). The protection of the golden eagle is based on tolerance payments. This paper combines legal studies and institutional economics to abduct the reasons underlying the success of both cases. In both cases, institutional entrepreneurship promoted the confidence of stakeholders and beneficiaries in the schemes and the consequent trust amongst the agents encouraged the actors to modify their behaviour. Article in Journal/Newspaper Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle Lapland Zenodo Nature Conservation 7 29 50 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Environmental law Institutional economics Biodiversity conservation Economic instruments: Payments for ecosystem services Pragmatism |
spellingShingle |
Environmental law Institutional economics Biodiversity conservation Economic instruments: Payments for ecosystem services Pragmatism Hiedanpää, Juha Borgström, Suvi Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland |
topic_facet |
Environmental law Institutional economics Biodiversity conservation Economic instruments: Payments for ecosystem services Pragmatism |
description |
Despite global, regional, and national policy efforts, biodiversity is on the decline worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to explore the critically important institutional and social features of those economic instruments that in practice motivate beneficiaries and stakeholders to protect biodiversity. The paper presents two case studies: the natural values trading (NVT) scheme in southwestern Finland and the protection of the golden eagle ( Aquila chrysaetos ) in Finnish Lapland. NVT builds upon the voluntary actions of landowners, payments for ecosystem services, and a fixed-term period of protection (ten years). The protection of the golden eagle is based on tolerance payments. This paper combines legal studies and institutional economics to abduct the reasons underlying the success of both cases. In both cases, institutional entrepreneurship promoted the confidence of stakeholders and beneficiaries in the schemes and the consequent trust amongst the agents encouraged the actors to modify their behaviour. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hiedanpää, Juha Borgström, Suvi |
author_facet |
Hiedanpää, Juha Borgström, Suvi |
author_sort |
Hiedanpää, Juha |
title |
Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland |
title_short |
Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland |
title_full |
Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland |
title_fullStr |
Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why do some institutional arrangements succeed? Voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in Southwestern Finland and of the Golden Eagle in Finnish Lapland |
title_sort |
why do some institutional arrangements succeed? voluntary protection of forest biodiversity in southwestern finland and of the golden eagle in finnish lapland |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 |
genre |
Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle Lapland |
genre_facet |
Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle Lapland |
op_source |
Nature Conservation, 7, 29-50, (2014-07-23) |
op_relation |
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 oai:zenodo.org:575262 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.6497 |
container_title |
Nature Conservation |
container_volume |
7 |
container_start_page |
29 |
op_container_end_page |
50 |
_version_ |
1810485955306455040 |