Leptochelia dubia Kroyer 1842

Leptochelia dubia (Krøyer, 1842) Figs 6 N, P; 9J, 10F, J; 12B, F; 13D, F Tanais dubius Krøyer, 1842: 178 –180, pl. 2, figs 20–22 (Type locality: Salvador de Bahia, Brazil, Holotype, ZMUC 6313). Leptochelia dubia : Sars (1882): 26–27; Sieg (1983): 447 –470 (Catalogue); Dojiri & Sieg (1997): 213 –...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jarquín-González, Jani, García-Madrigal, María Del Socorro, Carrera-Parra, Luis Fernando
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5463371
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B3AD532A64D7E6A9BB1C44509AFE1EF
Description
Summary:Leptochelia dubia (Krøyer, 1842) Figs 6 N, P; 9J, 10F, J; 12B, F; 13D, F Tanais dubius Krøyer, 1842: 178 –180, pl. 2, figs 20–22 (Type locality: Salvador de Bahia, Brazil, Holotype, ZMUC 6313). Leptochelia dubia : Sars (1882): 26–27; Sieg (1983): 447 –470 (Catalogue); Dojiri & Sieg (1997): 213 –217, figs 3.9–3.10; Suárez-Morales et al . (2004): 54 –60, figs 25–28; García-Madrigal et al . (2005): 1158 –1160, 1166. Geographic distribution. Widely distributed (but questionable). Habitat. In algae, seagrass, rocks, 1–215 m depth. Remarks. According to Sieg (1983) L. dubia has been considered a cosmopolitan species because it was widely recorded in tropical areas, transitional areas and Arctic waters. However, recent studies (Bamber 2010, 2012) indicated that L. dubia cannot be considered a cosmopolitan species because it has been shown that this group includes sibling or cryptic species, which are morphologically distinct. On the other hand, there are problems recognising the male of this species. Krøyer (1842) originally described only the males for L. savignyi and L. edwardsii later, both species were analysed by morphometric and traditional taxonomy and were designated as a single species, L. savignyi (Bamber 2010). Nevertheless, because L. dubia was considered synonymous with L. savignyi , it was inferred that males described by Krøyer (1842) were the same for both species. According to Bamber (2010), this idea is wrong because these species cannot be considered synonymous due to the disparity of their type localities, L. savignyi from Madeira, Portugal and L. dubia from Salvador de Bahia, Brazil. Therefore, it is necessary to redescribe L. dubia to clarify the male morphology. Published as part of Jarquín-González, Jani, García-Madrigal, María Del Socorro & Carrera-Parra, Luis Fernando, 2015, First species of Leptochelia Dana, 1849 (Crustacea: Tanaidacea) from the Eastern Pacific, with an annotated checklist and identification keys for the genus, pp. 501-533 in Zootaxa 3920 (4) on page 506, ...