Pelodryadidae

Pelodryadidae Tyler (1979:73) eloquently compared faunal relations between Africa and South America and those between that continent and Australia: “South America and Africa may be regarded as lovers who experienced and exploited a large zone of contact and had considerable opportunity for interchan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duellman, William E., Marion, Angela B., Hedges, Blair
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458557
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:5458557
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:5458557 2024-09-15T17:42:22+00:00 Pelodryadidae Duellman, William E. Marion, Angela B. Hedges, Blair 2016-12-31 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458557 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1 http://zenodo.org/record/265809 http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD3FFDDFFA91229F30F8D5E333EF35E https://sibils.text-analytics.ch/search/collections/plazi/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066 https://www.gbif.org/species/119611907 https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/41291/taxon/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066.taxon https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.265836 http://zoobank.org/D598E724-C9E4-4BBA-B25D-511300A47B1D https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458556 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458557 oai:zenodo.org:5458557 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae), pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa, 4104(1), 50-51, (2016-12-31) Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Chordata Amphibia Anura Pelodryadidae info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2016 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.545855710.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.110.5281/zenodo.26583610.5281/zenodo.5458556 2024-07-27T04:45:18Z Pelodryadidae Tyler (1979:73) eloquently compared faunal relations between Africa and South America and those between that continent and Australia: “South America and Africa may be regarded as lovers who experienced and exploited a large zone of contact and had considerable opportunity for interchange and exchange across it. In contrast, the South American-Australian relationship suffered from being in the form of an arranged engagement of longer duration. The couple never so much as touched one another at any time. The only contact was via a related intermediary named Aunt Arctica, whose presence between them effectively prevented a comparable degree of intimacy, and who is now outwardly cool and distinctly secretive about revealing what took place between them.” So be it. Although Hyla meridionalis now occurs in Mediterranean northwestern Africa, there is no evidence that hylid frogs ever existed in sub-Saharan Africa. These frogs originated in South America and dispersed from there to Australia and to North America. Ancestral Hylidae diverged from the phyllomedusid-pelodryadid clade in the Paleocene 61.8 (57.5–66.1) Mya. The hylid clade retained the ancestral chromosome complement of 2n = 24, whereas the number changed to 2n = 26 in the phyllomedusid-pelodryadid clade. Following the split of pelodryadid and phyllomedusid frogs at 52.5 (47.6–57.4) Mya, the initial divergence (crown node) of pelodryadid frogs occurred in the mid-Eocene 44.2 (40.1–48.3) Mya and that of phyllomedusid frogs was later, 33.3 (29.0–37.6) Mya. When South America separated from Antarctica 35.0–30.5 Mya, ancestral pelodryadid frogs were present on that continent and Australia before the latter separated from Antarctica 35.5 Mya (Fig. 18). Our analysis suggests that the differentiation of what are now Pelodryadinae and Pelobiinae occurred in the mid-Eocene and that the genera of pelodryadids differentiated (crown nodes) in the late Eocene and Oligocene: Nyctimystes 35.1 (29.3–40.8), Litoria 33.8 (28.9–38.7), Dryopsophus 29.5 (26.0–33.1) ... Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctica Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Amphibia
Anura
Pelodryadidae
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Amphibia
Anura
Pelodryadidae
Duellman, William E.
Marion, Angela B.
Hedges, Blair
Pelodryadidae
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Amphibia
Anura
Pelodryadidae
description Pelodryadidae Tyler (1979:73) eloquently compared faunal relations between Africa and South America and those between that continent and Australia: “South America and Africa may be regarded as lovers who experienced and exploited a large zone of contact and had considerable opportunity for interchange and exchange across it. In contrast, the South American-Australian relationship suffered from being in the form of an arranged engagement of longer duration. The couple never so much as touched one another at any time. The only contact was via a related intermediary named Aunt Arctica, whose presence between them effectively prevented a comparable degree of intimacy, and who is now outwardly cool and distinctly secretive about revealing what took place between them.” So be it. Although Hyla meridionalis now occurs in Mediterranean northwestern Africa, there is no evidence that hylid frogs ever existed in sub-Saharan Africa. These frogs originated in South America and dispersed from there to Australia and to North America. Ancestral Hylidae diverged from the phyllomedusid-pelodryadid clade in the Paleocene 61.8 (57.5–66.1) Mya. The hylid clade retained the ancestral chromosome complement of 2n = 24, whereas the number changed to 2n = 26 in the phyllomedusid-pelodryadid clade. Following the split of pelodryadid and phyllomedusid frogs at 52.5 (47.6–57.4) Mya, the initial divergence (crown node) of pelodryadid frogs occurred in the mid-Eocene 44.2 (40.1–48.3) Mya and that of phyllomedusid frogs was later, 33.3 (29.0–37.6) Mya. When South America separated from Antarctica 35.0–30.5 Mya, ancestral pelodryadid frogs were present on that continent and Australia before the latter separated from Antarctica 35.5 Mya (Fig. 18). Our analysis suggests that the differentiation of what are now Pelodryadinae and Pelobiinae occurred in the mid-Eocene and that the genera of pelodryadids differentiated (crown nodes) in the late Eocene and Oligocene: Nyctimystes 35.1 (29.3–40.8), Litoria 33.8 (28.9–38.7), Dryopsophus 29.5 (26.0–33.1) ...
format Other/Unknown Material
author Duellman, William E.
Marion, Angela B.
Hedges, Blair
author_facet Duellman, William E.
Marion, Angela B.
Hedges, Blair
author_sort Duellman, William E.
title Pelodryadidae
title_short Pelodryadidae
title_full Pelodryadidae
title_fullStr Pelodryadidae
title_full_unstemmed Pelodryadidae
title_sort pelodryadidae
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458557
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae), pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa, 4104(1), 50-51, (2016-12-31)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1
http://zenodo.org/record/265809
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFD3FFDDFFA91229F30F8D5E333EF35E
https://sibils.text-analytics.ch/search/collections/plazi/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066
https://www.gbif.org/species/119611907
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/41291/taxon/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066.taxon
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.265836
http://zoobank.org/D598E724-C9E4-4BBA-B25D-511300A47B1D
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458556
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458557
oai:zenodo.org:5458557
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA87A5FF98121BF3988B45323BF066
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.545855710.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.110.5281/zenodo.26583610.5281/zenodo.5458556
_version_ 1810488906391486464