Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated

In nature, individual reproductive success is seldom independent from year to year, due to factors such as reproductive costs and individual heterogeneity. However, population projection models that incorporate temporal autocorrelations in individual reproduction can be difficult to parameterize, pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Aline Magdalena, Sæther, Bernt-Erik, Markussen, Stine Svalheim, Engen, Steinar, Saether, Bernt-Erik
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/5002461
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:5002461
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:5002461 2023-06-06T11:42:56+02:00 Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated Lee, Aline Magdalena Sæther, Bernt-Erik Markussen, Stine Svalheim Engen, Steinar Saether, Bernt-Erik 2018-08-14 https://zenodo.org/record/5002461 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg unknown doi:10.1111/ele.12834 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://zenodo.org/record/5002461 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg oai:zenodo.org:5002461 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode reproductive autocorrelation age structure Demographic Stochasticity Alces alces matrix model dynamic heterogeneity moose info:eu-repo/semantics/other dataset 2018 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg10.1111/ele.12834 2023-04-13T21:30:15Z In nature, individual reproductive success is seldom independent from year to year, due to factors such as reproductive costs and individual heterogeneity. However, population projection models that incorporate temporal autocorrelations in individual reproduction can be difficult to parameterize, particularly when data are sparse. We therefore examine whether such models are necessary to avoid biased estimates of stochastic population growth and extinction risk, by comparing output from a matrix population model that incorporates reproductive autocorrelations to output from a standard age-structured matrix model that does not. We use a range of parameterizations, including a case study using moose data, treating probabilities of switching reproductive class as either fixed or fluctuating. Expected time to extinction from the two models is found to differ by only small amounts (under 10%) for most parameterizations, indicating that explicitly accounting for individual reproductive autocorrelations is in most cases not necessary to avoid bias in extinction estimates. Individual histories for moose at Vega 1984-2012Individual reproductive and survival histories for female moose at Vega 1984-2012. Numbers according to states: 1: Produced 0 calves, 2: Produced 1 calf, 3: Produced 2 calves, 4: Hunted, and 5: Natural death.Vegafemc190515.txt Dataset Alces alces Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic reproductive autocorrelation
age structure
Demographic Stochasticity
Alces alces
matrix model
dynamic heterogeneity
moose
spellingShingle reproductive autocorrelation
age structure
Demographic Stochasticity
Alces alces
matrix model
dynamic heterogeneity
moose
Lee, Aline Magdalena
Sæther, Bernt-Erik
Markussen, Stine Svalheim
Engen, Steinar
Saether, Bernt-Erik
Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
topic_facet reproductive autocorrelation
age structure
Demographic Stochasticity
Alces alces
matrix model
dynamic heterogeneity
moose
description In nature, individual reproductive success is seldom independent from year to year, due to factors such as reproductive costs and individual heterogeneity. However, population projection models that incorporate temporal autocorrelations in individual reproduction can be difficult to parameterize, particularly when data are sparse. We therefore examine whether such models are necessary to avoid biased estimates of stochastic population growth and extinction risk, by comparing output from a matrix population model that incorporates reproductive autocorrelations to output from a standard age-structured matrix model that does not. We use a range of parameterizations, including a case study using moose data, treating probabilities of switching reproductive class as either fixed or fluctuating. Expected time to extinction from the two models is found to differ by only small amounts (under 10%) for most parameterizations, indicating that explicitly accounting for individual reproductive autocorrelations is in most cases not necessary to avoid bias in extinction estimates. Individual histories for moose at Vega 1984-2012Individual reproductive and survival histories for female moose at Vega 1984-2012. Numbers according to states: 1: Produced 0 calves, 2: Produced 1 calf, 3: Produced 2 calves, 4: Hunted, and 5: Natural death.Vegafemc190515.txt
format Dataset
author Lee, Aline Magdalena
Sæther, Bernt-Erik
Markussen, Stine Svalheim
Engen, Steinar
Saether, Bernt-Erik
author_facet Lee, Aline Magdalena
Sæther, Bernt-Erik
Markussen, Stine Svalheim
Engen, Steinar
Saether, Bernt-Erik
author_sort Lee, Aline Magdalena
title Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
title_short Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
title_full Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
title_fullStr Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
title_sort data from: modeling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated
publishDate 2018
url https://zenodo.org/record/5002461
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_relation doi:10.1111/ele.12834
https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad
https://zenodo.org/record/5002461
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg
oai:zenodo.org:5002461
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5g0rg10.1111/ele.12834
_version_ 1767952378783334400