Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach

Planktivorous fish can exert strong top-down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helenius, Laura K., Aymà Padros, Anna, Leskinen, Elina, Lehtonen, Hannu, Nurminen, Leena
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s7622
_version_ 1821746388472430592
author Helenius, Laura K.
Aymà Padros, Anna
Leskinen, Elina
Lehtonen, Hannu
Nurminen, Leena
author_facet Helenius, Laura K.
Aymà Padros, Anna
Leskinen, Elina
Lehtonen, Hannu
Nurminen, Leena
author_sort Helenius, Laura K.
collection Zenodo
description Planktivorous fish can exert strong top-down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different feeding strategies, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), on a low-diversity brackish water zooplankton community using a 16-day mesocosm experiment. The experiment was conducted on a small-bodied spring zooplankton community in high-nutrient conditions, as well as a large-bodied summer community in low-nutrient conditions. Effects were highly dependent on the initial zooplankton community structure and hence seasonal variation. In a small-bodied community with high predation pressure and no dispersal or migration, the selective particulate-feeding stickleback depleted the zooplankton community and decreased its diversity more radically than the cruising filter-feeding roach. Cladocerans rather than copepods were efficiently removed by predation, and their removal caused altered patterns in rotifer abundance. In a large-bodied summer community with initial high taxonomic and functional diversity, predation pressure was lower and resource availability was high for omnivorous crustaceans preying on other zooplankton. In this community, predation maintained diversity, regardless of predator species. During both experimental periods, predation influenced the competitive relationship between the dominant calanoid copepods, and altered species composition and size structure of the zooplankton community. Changes also occurred to an extent at the level of nontarget prey, such as microzooplankton and rotifers, emphasizing the importance of subtle predation effects. We discuss our results in the context of the adaptive foraging mechanism and relate them to the natural littoral community. Littoral zooplankton diversity in aquatic feeding mesocosm experiment Data were ...
format Other/Unknown Material
genre Copepods
Rotifer
genre_facet Copepods
Rotifer
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4984029
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftzenodo
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s762210.1002/ece3.1488
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1488
https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s7622
oai:zenodo.org:4984029
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
publishDate 2016
publisher Zenodo
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4984029 2025-01-17T01:25:07+00:00 Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach Helenius, Laura K. Aymà Padros, Anna Leskinen, Elina Lehtonen, Hannu Nurminen, Leena 2016-03-25 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s7622 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1488 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s7622 oai:zenodo.org:4984029 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode feeding strategy mesocosm Rutilus rutilus Gasterosteus aculeatus info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2016 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s762210.1002/ece3.1488 2024-12-06T01:50:10Z Planktivorous fish can exert strong top-down control on zooplankton communities. By incorporating different feeding strategies, from selective particulate feeding to cruising filter feeding, fish species target distinct prey. In this study, we investigated the effects of two species with different feeding strategies, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), on a low-diversity brackish water zooplankton community using a 16-day mesocosm experiment. The experiment was conducted on a small-bodied spring zooplankton community in high-nutrient conditions, as well as a large-bodied summer community in low-nutrient conditions. Effects were highly dependent on the initial zooplankton community structure and hence seasonal variation. In a small-bodied community with high predation pressure and no dispersal or migration, the selective particulate-feeding stickleback depleted the zooplankton community and decreased its diversity more radically than the cruising filter-feeding roach. Cladocerans rather than copepods were efficiently removed by predation, and their removal caused altered patterns in rotifer abundance. In a large-bodied summer community with initial high taxonomic and functional diversity, predation pressure was lower and resource availability was high for omnivorous crustaceans preying on other zooplankton. In this community, predation maintained diversity, regardless of predator species. During both experimental periods, predation influenced the competitive relationship between the dominant calanoid copepods, and altered species composition and size structure of the zooplankton community. Changes also occurred to an extent at the level of nontarget prey, such as microzooplankton and rotifers, emphasizing the importance of subtle predation effects. We discuss our results in the context of the adaptive foraging mechanism and relate them to the natural littoral community. Littoral zooplankton diversity in aquatic feeding mesocosm experiment Data were ... Other/Unknown Material Copepods Rotifer Zenodo
spellingShingle feeding strategy
mesocosm
Rutilus rutilus
Gasterosteus aculeatus
Helenius, Laura K.
Aymà Padros, Anna
Leskinen, Elina
Lehtonen, Hannu
Nurminen, Leena
Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
title Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
title_full Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
title_fullStr Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
title_short Data from: Strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
title_sort data from: strategies of zooplanktivory shape dynamics and diversity of littoral plankton communities: a mesocosm approach
topic feeding strategy
mesocosm
Rutilus rutilus
Gasterosteus aculeatus
topic_facet feeding strategy
mesocosm
Rutilus rutilus
Gasterosteus aculeatus
url https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s7622