Data from: Wind exposure and light exposure, more than elevation-related temperature, limit tree line seedling abundance on three continents

• Main Authors: McIntire, Eliot J. B., Piper, Frida I., Fajardo, Alex
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2017
• Subjects: Nothofagus betuloides; Pinus cembra; Nothofagus antarctica; hierarchical modeling; Larix decidua; plant-climate interactions; stress gradient hypothesis; Pinus albicaulis; alpine treelines; Nothofagus pumilio; Antarc*; Antarctica
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.j0v43

The transition from seedlings into trees at alpine treelines is a temperature-limited process that ultimately sets the treeline elevation at a global scale. As such, treelines may be key bioassays of global warming effects on species distributions. For global warming to promote upward treeline migration, as predicted, seedlings must be available. We examined, for the first time at a global scale, elevational patterns and drivers of seedling availability at treelines. Working at 10 sites across five mountain regions, (dry Andes, humid Andes, Patagonian Andes, Swiss Alps, and US Rocky Mountains) with different treeline forms (abrupt and diffuse) and dominated by different tree species (broadleaves and conifers), we answered the following question: how is seedling abundance affected by elevation (as a coarse grain-surrogate of temperature), light exposure (openness immediately above plots) or wind exposure (an index for openness in the horizontal direction), or combinations thereof and, what is the relative importance of each factor? We tested five biological hypotheses to determine the relative strength of these treeline drivers on variable-size sampling plots of seedling abundance (S) (N = 1056). Specifically, we tested likely combinations of temperature limitation (T), light as a resource (light, L) and as a radiation stress (via high light at low temperature, R), wind exposure as a treeline stressor (W) and treeline form (a coarse scale test: abrupt vs. diffuse, D). We found strong, moderate, and weak negative effects of our estimates of wind exposure, radiation stress, and elevation-related temperature on seedling abundance, respectively. We also found a positive effect, at treeline, for site-level treeline diffuseness. Two distinct facilitation mechanisms likely improved seedling abundance at treeline elevation: wind blockage by neighbourhood trees (the sheltering effect) and partial shading by overhead trees. Synthesis. Seedling abundance at alpine treelines is limited by multiple simultaneous factors with ...