Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i)...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4954108 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4954108 2023-06-06T11:51:34+02:00 Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction Howison, Ruth A. Olff, Han van de Koppel, Johan Smit, Christian 2017-03-14 https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 unknown doi:10.1002/ecm.1259 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 oai:zenodo.org:4954108 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode grazing ecosystems bistable states water infiltration soil amelioration patch conversion compaction abiotic stress ecosystem engineering nutrient availability info:eu-repo/semantics/other dataset 2017 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j710.1002/ecm.1259 2023-04-13T21:51:59Z Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, ii) plant growth-water infiltration feedback under aridity, and iii) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity. Howison et al 2017 Bioturbation BiocompactionTITLE: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction AUTHORS: Ruth A. Howison, Han Olff, Johan van de Koppel, and Christian Smit Corresponding author: Ruth A. Howison (ruthhowison@gmail.com) BifurcationModel.zip Bifurcation model resulting in figures 2 and 3, designed and written by Johan van de Koppel and Ruth Howison, using R. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R ... Dataset Arctic Tundra Zenodo Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
unknown |
topic |
grazing ecosystems bistable states water infiltration soil amelioration patch conversion compaction abiotic stress ecosystem engineering nutrient availability |
spellingShingle |
grazing ecosystems bistable states water infiltration soil amelioration patch conversion compaction abiotic stress ecosystem engineering nutrient availability Howison, Ruth A. Olff, Han van de Koppel, Johan Smit, Christian Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
topic_facet |
grazing ecosystems bistable states water infiltration soil amelioration patch conversion compaction abiotic stress ecosystem engineering nutrient availability |
description |
Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, ii) plant growth-water infiltration feedback under aridity, and iii) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity. Howison et al 2017 Bioturbation BiocompactionTITLE: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction AUTHORS: Ruth A. Howison, Han Olff, Johan van de Koppel, and Christian Smit Corresponding author: Ruth A. Howison (ruthhowison@gmail.com) BifurcationModel.zip Bifurcation model resulting in figures 2 and 3, designed and written by Johan van de Koppel and Ruth Howison, using R. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R ... |
format |
Dataset |
author |
Howison, Ruth A. Olff, Han van de Koppel, Johan Smit, Christian |
author_facet |
Howison, Ruth A. Olff, Han van de Koppel, Johan Smit, Christian |
author_sort |
Howison, Ruth A. |
title |
Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
title_short |
Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
title_full |
Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
title_fullStr |
Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
title_sort |
data from: biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic Tundra |
genre_facet |
Arctic Tundra |
op_relation |
doi:10.1002/ecm.1259 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 oai:zenodo.org:4954108 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j710.1002/ecm.1259 |
_version_ |
1767957255373717504 |