Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction

Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Howison, Ruth A., Olff, Han, van de Koppel, Johan, Smit, Christian
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/4954108
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4954108
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4954108 2023-06-06T11:51:34+02:00 Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction Howison, Ruth A. Olff, Han van de Koppel, Johan Smit, Christian 2017-03-14 https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 unknown doi:10.1002/ecm.1259 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://zenodo.org/record/4954108 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7 oai:zenodo.org:4954108 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode grazing ecosystems bistable states water infiltration soil amelioration patch conversion compaction abiotic stress ecosystem engineering nutrient availability info:eu-repo/semantics/other dataset 2017 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j710.1002/ecm.1259 2023-04-13T21:51:59Z Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, ii) plant growth-water infiltration feedback under aridity, and iii) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity. Howison et al 2017 Bioturbation BiocompactionTITLE: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction AUTHORS: Ruth A. Howison, Han Olff, Johan van de Koppel, and Christian Smit Corresponding author: Ruth A. Howison (ruthhowison@gmail.com) BifurcationModel.zip Bifurcation model resulting in figures 2 and 3, designed and written by Johan van de Koppel and Ruth Howison, using R. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R ... Dataset Arctic Tundra Zenodo Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic grazing ecosystems
bistable states
water infiltration
soil amelioration
patch conversion
compaction
abiotic stress
ecosystem engineering
nutrient availability
spellingShingle grazing ecosystems
bistable states
water infiltration
soil amelioration
patch conversion
compaction
abiotic stress
ecosystem engineering
nutrient availability
Howison, Ruth A.
Olff, Han
van de Koppel, Johan
Smit, Christian
Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
topic_facet grazing ecosystems
bistable states
water infiltration
soil amelioration
patch conversion
compaction
abiotic stress
ecosystem engineering
nutrient availability
description Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, ii) plant growth-water infiltration feedback under aridity, and iii) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity. Howison et al 2017 Bioturbation BiocompactionTITLE: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction AUTHORS: Ruth A. Howison, Han Olff, Johan van de Koppel, and Christian Smit Corresponding author: Ruth A. Howison (ruthhowison@gmail.com) BifurcationModel.zip Bifurcation model resulting in figures 2 and 3, designed and written by Johan van de Koppel and Ruth Howison, using R. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R ...
format Dataset
author Howison, Ruth A.
Olff, Han
van de Koppel, Johan
Smit, Christian
author_facet Howison, Ruth A.
Olff, Han
van de Koppel, Johan
Smit, Christian
author_sort Howison, Ruth A.
title Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_short Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_full Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_fullStr Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_sort data from: biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
publishDate 2017
url https://zenodo.org/record/4954108
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
op_relation doi:10.1002/ecm.1259
https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad
https://zenodo.org/record/4954108
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j7
oai:zenodo.org:4954108
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3f2j710.1002/ecm.1259
_version_ 1767957255373717504