Data from: Land use change increases climatic vulnerability of migratory birds: insights from integrated population modelling

• Main Authors: Zhao, Qing, Arnold, Todd W., Devries, James H., Howerter, David W., Clark, Robert G., Weegman, Mitch D.
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2019
• Subjects: 1961-2014; habitat loss; wetland habitat; Anas acuta; integrative modelling; band-recovery data
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.g4gc2vs

1. Knowledge of land use patterns that could affect animal population resiliency or vulnerability to environmental threats such as climate change is essential, yet the interactive effects of land use and climate on demography across space and time can be difficult to study. This is particularly true for migratory species, which rely on different landscapes throughout the year. 2. Unlike most North American migratory waterfowl, populations of northern pintails (Anas acuta; hereafter pintails) have not recovered since the 1980s despite extended periods of abundant flooded wetlands (i.e. ponds). The mechanisms and drivers involved in this discrepancy remain poorly understood. While pintails are similar to other ducks in their dependence on ponds throughout their annual cycle, their extensive use of croplands for nesting differentiates them and makes them particularly vulnerable to changes in agricultural land use on prairie breeding grounds. 3. Our intent was to quantify how changes in land use and ponds on breeding grounds have influenced pintail population dynamics by developing an integrated population model to analyse over five decades (1961–2014) of band-recovery, breeding population survey, land use and pond count data. We focused especially on the interactive effects of pond counts and land use on pintail productivity, while accounting for density dependent processes. 4. Pintail populations responded more strongly to annual variation in productivity than survival. Productivity was positively correlated with pond count and negatively correlated with agricultural intensification. Further, a positive interaction between pond count and agricultural intensification was insufficient to overcome the strong negative effect of agricultural intensification on pintail productivity across nearly all pond counts. The interaction also indicated that pintail populations were more negatively impacted by the decrease in ponds associated with climate change under higher agricultural intensification. 5. Our results indicate ...