Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea

Large-scale trends in planktonic foraminiferal diversity have so far been based on utilization of synoptic biostratigraphic range charts. Although this approach ensures the taxonomic consistency and quality of the data being used, it takes no formal account of any sampling biases that might exist in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lloyd, Graeme T., Pearson, Paul N., Young, Jeremy R., Smith, Andrew B.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4937751
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4937751 2024-09-09T20:03:54+00:00 Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea Lloyd, Graeme T. Pearson, Paul N. Young, Jeremy R. Smith, Andrew B. 2012-04-24 https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.1666/11041.1 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p oai:zenodo.org:4937751 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode Foraminifera sampling bias rock record info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2012 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p10.1666/11041.1 2024-07-26T07:23:50Z Large-scale trends in planktonic foraminiferal diversity have so far been based on utilization of synoptic biostratigraphic range charts. Although this approach ensures the taxonomic consistency and quality of the data being used, it takes no formal account of any sampling biases that might exist in the fossil record. We demonstrate that the occurrence data of planktonic foraminifera, as recorded in the primary literature, are strongly biased by sampling. We do this by demonstrating that raw diversity curves derived from the land-based and deep-sea records are strikingly different, but that they each correlate with the intensity of sampling in their respective environments, and thus are ultimately controlled by the structure of the geological record in each setting. Because sampling of the Mesozoic record is best in our land record whereas sampling of the Cenozoic is best in our deep-sea record, we combine the two to generate the best-supported estimates of species and genus diversity over time from these data. We correct for sampling bias using shareholder quorum subsampling and a modeling approach. The data are then transformed to generate a range-through plot of species richness that is compared with two earlier estimates of the diversity history where comparable species-in-bin data can be recovered. No robust statistical correlation is found among the three estimates. Although differences in amplitude are to be expected, differences in the actual shape of the curve are surprising. We conclude that these differences stem from the nature of the data themselves, namely the taxonomic scheme adopted and the taxonomic coverage used. Supplementary Table1 List of planktonic foraminifera species recorded from Atlantic deep‐sea cores included in this study for each time bin. Note that only those species that can be unambiguously dated to within a time bin are included. Columns give the time interval covered in millions of years. Supplementary Table2 List of planktonic foraminifera species recorded from land‐based ... Other/Unknown Material Planktonic foraminifera Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic Foraminifera
sampling bias
rock record
spellingShingle Foraminifera
sampling bias
rock record
Lloyd, Graeme T.
Pearson, Paul N.
Young, Jeremy R.
Smith, Andrew B.
Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
topic_facet Foraminifera
sampling bias
rock record
description Large-scale trends in planktonic foraminiferal diversity have so far been based on utilization of synoptic biostratigraphic range charts. Although this approach ensures the taxonomic consistency and quality of the data being used, it takes no formal account of any sampling biases that might exist in the fossil record. We demonstrate that the occurrence data of planktonic foraminifera, as recorded in the primary literature, are strongly biased by sampling. We do this by demonstrating that raw diversity curves derived from the land-based and deep-sea records are strikingly different, but that they each correlate with the intensity of sampling in their respective environments, and thus are ultimately controlled by the structure of the geological record in each setting. Because sampling of the Mesozoic record is best in our land record whereas sampling of the Cenozoic is best in our deep-sea record, we combine the two to generate the best-supported estimates of species and genus diversity over time from these data. We correct for sampling bias using shareholder quorum subsampling and a modeling approach. The data are then transformed to generate a range-through plot of species richness that is compared with two earlier estimates of the diversity history where comparable species-in-bin data can be recovered. No robust statistical correlation is found among the three estimates. Although differences in amplitude are to be expected, differences in the actual shape of the curve are surprising. We conclude that these differences stem from the nature of the data themselves, namely the taxonomic scheme adopted and the taxonomic coverage used. Supplementary Table1 List of planktonic foraminifera species recorded from Atlantic deep‐sea cores included in this study for each time bin. Note that only those species that can be unambiguously dated to within a time bin are included. Columns give the time interval covered in millions of years. Supplementary Table2 List of planktonic foraminifera species recorded from land‐based ...
format Other/Unknown Material
author Lloyd, Graeme T.
Pearson, Paul N.
Young, Jeremy R.
Smith, Andrew B.
author_facet Lloyd, Graeme T.
Pearson, Paul N.
Young, Jeremy R.
Smith, Andrew B.
author_sort Lloyd, Graeme T.
title Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
title_short Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
title_full Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
title_fullStr Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
title_full_unstemmed Data from: Sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
title_sort data from: sampling bias and the fossil record of planktonic foraminifera on land and in the deep sea
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1666/11041.1
https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p
oai:zenodo.org:4937751
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8ts3p10.1666/11041.1
_version_ 1809935916939083776