Euura lanatae Malaise 1921

• Main Authors: Liston, Andrew D., Heibo, Erik, Prous, Marko, Vårdal, Hege, Nyman, Tommi, Vikberg, Veli
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2017
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Taxonomy; Animalia; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Tenthredinidae; Euura; Euura lanatae; Salix lanata
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4901984; http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B9953B5C1A5965FF48FB7F239FF864

Euura lanatae Malaise, 1921 Euura lanatae Malaise, 1921: 105 –106. Described: ♀, ♂, larva, gall, recorded host: Salix lanata . Lectotype, designated below. Type locality: Sweden, Torne Träsk area. Euura ( Gemmura ) lanatae : Viitasaari & Vikberg (1985). Nematus ( Euura ) lanatae : Zhelochovtsev (1988). Euura ( Gemmura ) boreoalpina Kopelke, 2001: 197 –201. Described: ♀, ♂, gall, recorded host: Salix glauca . Holotype, ♀, SMF [examined]. Type locality: Norway, Hordaland, Vikafjell near Viksøyri. Preoccupied in Euura by E. boreoalpina (Lindqvist, 1961). Syn. nov. Euura glaucatumida Kopelke in Prous et al. 2014: 53, replacement name for E. boreoalpina Kopelke. Notes on types and taxonomy. E. lanatae . Lectotype, ♀, hereby designated: "2", "Torne Tr. Malaise", "Type", " Euura lanatae (ex gall) n. sp." [Malaise's handwriting], "Typus" [red], "NHRS-HEVA000003490", "Lectotype ♀ Euura lanatae Malaise, 1921 des. A. Liston 2016" [red], "DEI-GISHym21299", NHRS. Paralectotypes: 5♀, 4♂, same data as lectotype, with labels "DEI-GISHym21299[–21308]" and “NHRS-HEVA000003491[-3499]”, NHRS. Kopelke (2001) referred in error to the existence of a holotype. The original description of lanatae refers to a type series of 13 females and 8 males. The whereabouts of the missing specimens are unknown. E. glaucatumida is not morphologically distinguishable from E. lanatae . The colour of the tegulae and metafemora, indicated to differ between the two nominal species by Kopelke (2001), is variable in specimens reared from both hosts. On average, specimens reared from S. lanata are larger than those from S. glauca , but this may only be a result of the larger buds of the former host. Kopelke (2001) described and figured the penis valve of E. lanatae as lacking the small notch between the base of the valvispina and the distal lobe of the paravalva, whereas the notch should be present in E. boreoalpina . In the specimens examined, we found this character to display a continuous spectrum of variability (Figs 297–301), that was not ...