Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding

Bulk macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding is proven a useful tool for routine assessment of freshwater ecosystems. Following a small scale study in 2017, using 18 samples from Finland Elbrecht et al. 2017, sampling and metabarcoding efforts were extended to a total of 297 official monitoring samples...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Main Authors: Elbrecht, Vasco, Buchner, Dominik, Majaneva, Markus, Mordente, Adriana, Aroviita, Jukka, Ekrem, Torbjørn, Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette, Ólafsson, Jón, Johnson, Richard, Schartau, Ann, Friberg, Nikolai, Leese, Florian, Kristian, Meissner
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2021
Subjects:
WFD
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/4599906
https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4599906
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4599906 2023-05-15T16:13:01+02:00 Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding Elbrecht, Vasco Buchner, Dominik Majaneva, Markus Mordente, Adriana Aroviita, Jukka Ekrem, Torbjørn Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette Ólafsson, Jón Johnson, Richard Schartau, Ann Friberg, Nikolai Leese, Florian Kristian, Meissner 2021-03-04 https://zenodo.org/record/4599906 https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://zenodo.org/record/4599906 https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756 oai:zenodo.org:4599906 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode ARPHA Conference Abstracts 4 e64756 DNA metabarcoding WFD water quality macroinvertebrates info:eu-repo/semantics/article publication-article 2021 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756 2023-03-10T23:09:00Z Bulk macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding is proven a useful tool for routine assessment of freshwater ecosystems. Following a small scale study in 2017, using 18 samples from Finland Elbrecht et al. 2017, sampling and metabarcoding efforts were extended to a total of 297 official monitoring samples from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, and Finland as part of the SCANDNAnet project. Macroinvertebrates from these samples were morphologically identified and subsequently DNA metabarcoding was performed. While the project was ultimately successful, documenting generally congruence between identification methods, we encountered a wide range of unexpected challenges when scaling sample throughput Meissner et al. 2020.In this technical talk we highlight major roadblocks and potential solutions to improve turnaround time and reliability of future large scale DNA based monitoring efforts. We identify a need for tighter quality control and quality assurance in laboratory procedures, and exemplify the benefits of laboratory automation when processing hundreds of samples within a single week. We further discuss the need for scalable computational infrastructure, reliable sequencing providers and well-curated, purpose driven, macroinvertebrate reference databases for the Fennoscandian region. The lessons learned from the SCANDNAnet project will be indispensable in building a reliable infrastructure for a future DNA based monitoring of macroinvertebrates across Fennioscandia and beyond. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fennoscandian Iceland Zenodo Norway ARPHA Conference Abstracts 4
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic DNA metabarcoding
WFD
water quality
macroinvertebrates
spellingShingle DNA metabarcoding
WFD
water quality
macroinvertebrates
Elbrecht, Vasco
Buchner, Dominik
Majaneva, Markus
Mordente, Adriana
Aroviita, Jukka
Ekrem, Torbjørn
Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette
Ólafsson, Jón
Johnson, Richard
Schartau, Ann
Friberg, Nikolai
Leese, Florian
Kristian, Meissner
Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding
topic_facet DNA metabarcoding
WFD
water quality
macroinvertebrates
description Bulk macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding is proven a useful tool for routine assessment of freshwater ecosystems. Following a small scale study in 2017, using 18 samples from Finland Elbrecht et al. 2017, sampling and metabarcoding efforts were extended to a total of 297 official monitoring samples from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, and Finland as part of the SCANDNAnet project. Macroinvertebrates from these samples were morphologically identified and subsequently DNA metabarcoding was performed. While the project was ultimately successful, documenting generally congruence between identification methods, we encountered a wide range of unexpected challenges when scaling sample throughput Meissner et al. 2020.In this technical talk we highlight major roadblocks and potential solutions to improve turnaround time and reliability of future large scale DNA based monitoring efforts. We identify a need for tighter quality control and quality assurance in laboratory procedures, and exemplify the benefits of laboratory automation when processing hundreds of samples within a single week. We further discuss the need for scalable computational infrastructure, reliable sequencing providers and well-curated, purpose driven, macroinvertebrate reference databases for the Fennoscandian region. The lessons learned from the SCANDNAnet project will be indispensable in building a reliable infrastructure for a future DNA based monitoring of macroinvertebrates across Fennioscandia and beyond.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Elbrecht, Vasco
Buchner, Dominik
Majaneva, Markus
Mordente, Adriana
Aroviita, Jukka
Ekrem, Torbjørn
Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette
Ólafsson, Jón
Johnson, Richard
Schartau, Ann
Friberg, Nikolai
Leese, Florian
Kristian, Meissner
author_facet Elbrecht, Vasco
Buchner, Dominik
Majaneva, Markus
Mordente, Adriana
Aroviita, Jukka
Ekrem, Torbjørn
Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette
Ólafsson, Jón
Johnson, Richard
Schartau, Ann
Friberg, Nikolai
Leese, Florian
Kristian, Meissner
author_sort Elbrecht, Vasco
title Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding
title_short Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding
title_full Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding
title_fullStr Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding
title_full_unstemmed Technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate DNA metabarcoding
title_sort technical challenges when scaling up macroinvertebrate dna metabarcoding
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2021
url https://zenodo.org/record/4599906
https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Fennoscandian
Iceland
genre_facet Fennoscandian
Iceland
op_source ARPHA Conference Abstracts 4 e64756
op_relation https://zenodo.org/record/4599906
https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756
oai:zenodo.org:4599906
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64756
container_title ARPHA Conference Abstracts
container_volume 4
_version_ 1765998624317112320