Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)

Ocean warm and saline Atlantic water (AW) flows northward towards the Arctic. This water crosses the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge in three inflow branches:  the Iceland branch,  the Faroe branch and  the Shetland branch. The first monitoring of these branches was obtained along standard hydrographic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Larsen, Karin Margretha, Hansen, Bogi, Jónsson, Steingrímur, Macrander, Andreas, Berx, Barbara, Walicka, Kamila, Østerhus, Svein
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276045
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4276045
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:4276045 2024-09-09T19:27:51+00:00 Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8) Larsen, Karin Margretha Hansen, Bogi Jónsson, Steingrímur Macrander, Andreas Berx, Barbara Walicka, Kamila Østerhus, Svein 2020-11-16 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276045 unknown Zenodo https://zenodo.org/communities/eu https://zenodo.org/communities/blue-actionh2020 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276044 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276045 oai:zenodo.org:4276045 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode info:eu-repo/semantics/report 2020 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.427604510.5281/zenodo.4276044 2024-07-26T22:47:39Z Ocean warm and saline Atlantic water (AW) flows northward towards the Arctic. This water crosses the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge in three inflow branches:  the Iceland branch,  the Faroe branch and  the Shetland branch. The first monitoring of these branches was obtained along standard hydrographic sections and in the 1990s these observations were complemented by – at that time the state‐of‐the‐art technology – Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) that could measure ocean currents directly. For many years the ADCPs were the backbone in transport estimates of the inflowing AW, but in order to get reliable estimates, a high number of moorings were necessary which was costly both in consumables and man‐power. Alternative methods were therefore needed. The process to optimise the inflow arrays began several years ago by the integration of Satellite Altimetry data . Over the years, more data have been obtained at the inflow arrays, including new data types, and within Blue‐Action analyses have been performed utilizing the available data in order to optimise the monitoring of the inflow arrays both with respect to cost and in order to produce more accurate estimates of AW volume, heat and salt transports. Resulting from the work undertaken in Blue‐Action, the recommendations for future monitoring the three inflow branches are as follows: Iceland branch: Combined observations from one or two ADCP moorings (including hydrographicobservations at intermediate depth) and four annual hydrographic surveys. Faroe branch: Combined observations from satellite altimetry, one ADCP mooring, three PIES (Pressure Inverted Echo Sounders), one bottom temperature logger and at least three annual hydrographic surveys. Shetland branch: A combination of gridded geostrophic surface velocities from satellite altimetry, at least three annual hydrographic cruises along the section and continued ADCP deployments at key sites (such as in the Shetland slope current). The Blue-Action project has received funding from the European Union's ... Report Arctic Greenland Greenland-Scotland Ridge Iceland Zenodo Arctic Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
description Ocean warm and saline Atlantic water (AW) flows northward towards the Arctic. This water crosses the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge in three inflow branches:  the Iceland branch,  the Faroe branch and  the Shetland branch. The first monitoring of these branches was obtained along standard hydrographic sections and in the 1990s these observations were complemented by – at that time the state‐of‐the‐art technology – Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) that could measure ocean currents directly. For many years the ADCPs were the backbone in transport estimates of the inflowing AW, but in order to get reliable estimates, a high number of moorings were necessary which was costly both in consumables and man‐power. Alternative methods were therefore needed. The process to optimise the inflow arrays began several years ago by the integration of Satellite Altimetry data . Over the years, more data have been obtained at the inflow arrays, including new data types, and within Blue‐Action analyses have been performed utilizing the available data in order to optimise the monitoring of the inflow arrays both with respect to cost and in order to produce more accurate estimates of AW volume, heat and salt transports. Resulting from the work undertaken in Blue‐Action, the recommendations for future monitoring the three inflow branches are as follows: Iceland branch: Combined observations from one or two ADCP moorings (including hydrographicobservations at intermediate depth) and four annual hydrographic surveys. Faroe branch: Combined observations from satellite altimetry, one ADCP mooring, three PIES (Pressure Inverted Echo Sounders), one bottom temperature logger and at least three annual hydrographic surveys. Shetland branch: A combination of gridded geostrophic surface velocities from satellite altimetry, at least three annual hydrographic cruises along the section and continued ADCP deployments at key sites (such as in the Shetland slope current). The Blue-Action project has received funding from the European Union's ...
format Report
author Larsen, Karin Margretha
Hansen, Bogi
Jónsson, Steingrímur
Macrander, Andreas
Berx, Barbara
Walicka, Kamila
Østerhus, Svein
spellingShingle Larsen, Karin Margretha
Hansen, Bogi
Jónsson, Steingrímur
Macrander, Andreas
Berx, Barbara
Walicka, Kamila
Østerhus, Svein
Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)
author_facet Larsen, Karin Margretha
Hansen, Bogi
Jónsson, Steingrímur
Macrander, Andreas
Berx, Barbara
Walicka, Kamila
Østerhus, Svein
author_sort Larsen, Karin Margretha
title Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)
title_short Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)
title_full Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)
title_fullStr Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge inflow arrays (D2.8)
title_sort optimization of the greenland‐scotland ridge inflow arrays (d2.8)
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276045
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
Greenland
Greenland-Scotland Ridge
Iceland
genre_facet Arctic
Greenland
Greenland-Scotland Ridge
Iceland
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://zenodo.org/communities/blue-actionh2020
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276044
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4276045
oai:zenodo.org:4276045
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.427604510.5281/zenodo.4276044
_version_ 1809897197857144832