Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems

Leading up to the 2020 Convention on Biological Diversity there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human infl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riggio, Jason, Baillie, Jonathan E. M., Brumby, Steven, Ellis, Erle, Kennedy, Christina M., Oakleaf, James R., Tait, Alex, Tepe, Therese, Theobald, David M., Venter, Oscar, Watson, James E.M., Jacobson, Andrew P.
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/3901832
https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3901832
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3901832 2023-05-15T18:40:17+02:00 Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems Riggio, Jason Baillie, Jonathan E. M. Brumby, Steven Ellis, Erle Kennedy, Christina M. Oakleaf, James R. Tait, Alex Tepe, Therese Theobald, David M. Venter, Oscar Watson, James E.M. Jacobson, Andrew P. 2020-06-19 https://zenodo.org/record/3901832 https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z unknown doi:10.1111/gcb.15109 https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad https://zenodo.org/record/3901832 https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z oai:zenodo.org:3901832 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode info:eu-repo/semantics/other dataset 2020 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z10.1111/gcb.15109 2023-03-10T17:40:26Z Leading up to the 2020 Convention on Biological Diversity there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint, and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20-34%) and low (48-56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non-permanent ice- or snow-covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost. See Methods in publication. Dataset Tundra Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
description Leading up to the 2020 Convention on Biological Diversity there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint, and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20-34%) and low (48-56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non-permanent ice- or snow-covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost. See Methods in publication.
format Dataset
author Riggio, Jason
Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
Brumby, Steven
Ellis, Erle
Kennedy, Christina M.
Oakleaf, James R.
Tait, Alex
Tepe, Therese
Theobald, David M.
Venter, Oscar
Watson, James E.M.
Jacobson, Andrew P.
spellingShingle Riggio, Jason
Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
Brumby, Steven
Ellis, Erle
Kennedy, Christina M.
Oakleaf, James R.
Tait, Alex
Tepe, Therese
Theobald, David M.
Venter, Oscar
Watson, James E.M.
Jacobson, Andrew P.
Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
author_facet Riggio, Jason
Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
Brumby, Steven
Ellis, Erle
Kennedy, Christina M.
Oakleaf, James R.
Tait, Alex
Tepe, Therese
Theobald, David M.
Venter, Oscar
Watson, James E.M.
Jacobson, Andrew P.
author_sort Riggio, Jason
title Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_short Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_full Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_fullStr Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_sort global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
publishDate 2020
url https://zenodo.org/record/3901832
https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_relation doi:10.1111/gcb.15109
https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad
https://zenodo.org/record/3901832
https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z
oai:zenodo.org:3901832
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z10.1111/gcb.15109
_version_ 1766229591089741824