The smut fungi of Greenland
The first taxonomic treatment of the smut fungi in Greenland is provided. A total of 43 species in 11 genera are treated and illustrated by photographs of sori, microphotographs of spores in LM and SEM, and distribution maps. Two species, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae and Urocystis tothii, are recorde...
Published in: | MycoKeys |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3708643 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis |
spellingShingle |
Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis Denchev, Teodor T. Knudsen, Henning Denchev, Cvetomir M. The smut fungi of Greenland |
topic_facet |
Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis |
description |
The first taxonomic treatment of the smut fungi in Greenland is provided. A total of 43 species in 11 genera are treated and illustrated by photographs of sori, microphotographs of spores in LM and SEM, and distribution maps. Two species, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae and Urocystis tothii, are recorded as new from North America. Thirteen species, Anthracoidea altera, A. capillaris, A. limosa, A. liroi, A. pseudofoetidae, A. scirpoideae, A. turfosa, Microbotryum lagerheimii, M. stellariae, Schizonella elynae, Stegocintractia luzulae, Urocystis fischeri, and U. tothii, are reported for the first time from Greenland. Three new fungus-host combinations, Anthracoidea capillaris on Carex boecheriana, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae on Carex maritima, and Urocystis tothii on Juncus biglumis, are given. Five plant species are reported as new hosts of smut fungi in Greenland, namely, Carex nigra for Anthracoidea heterospora, C. canescens for Anthracoidea karii, C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Anthracoidea misandrae, C. maritima for Orphanomyces arcticus, and C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Schizonella melanogramma. Three species, Microbotryum violaceum s. str. (recorded as 'Ustilago violacea'), Urocystis anemones, and U. junci, which were previously reported from Greenland, are considered wrongly identified. Additional distribution records are given for 12 species from Greenland: Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. caricis, A. elynae, A. lindebergiae, A. misandrae, A. nardinae, A. rupestris, A. scirpi, Schizonella melanogramma, Stegocintractia hyperborea, Urocystis agropyri, and U. sorosporioides. The most numerous distribution groups are the following: circumpolar–alpine and Arctic–alpine species – 14; circumboreal–polar species – 10; and circumpolar and Arctic species – 6. The most widely distributed smut fungi in Greenland were Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. elynae, Microbotryum bistortarum, and M. vinosum. Most species were found in the High Arctic zone (29 species), while from the Low Arctic zone and the Subarctic zone, 26 and 19 ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Denchev, Teodor T. Knudsen, Henning Denchev, Cvetomir M. |
author_facet |
Denchev, Teodor T. Knudsen, Henning Denchev, Cvetomir M. |
author_sort |
Denchev, Teodor T. |
title |
The smut fungi of Greenland |
title_short |
The smut fungi of Greenland |
title_full |
The smut fungi of Greenland |
title_fullStr |
The smut fungi of Greenland |
title_full_unstemmed |
The smut fungi of Greenland |
title_sort |
smut fungi of greenland |
publisher |
Pensoft Publishers |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 |
genre |
Greenland Subarctic |
genre_facet |
Greenland Subarctic |
op_source |
MycoKeys, 64, 1-164, (2020-03-05) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure17 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure33 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure11 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure13 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure26 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure40 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure24 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure9 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure23 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure31 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure34 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure10 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure16 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure22 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure30 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure39 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure36 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure18 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure35 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure14 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure20 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure29 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure8 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure41 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure15 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure7 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure25 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure5 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure38 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure21 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure6 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure4 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure12 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure19 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure27 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure28 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure32 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure37 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 oai:zenodo.org:3708643 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.4738010.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1710.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2610.3897/myc |
container_title |
MycoKeys |
container_volume |
64 |
container_start_page |
1 |
op_container_end_page |
164 |
_version_ |
1810445898464886784 |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3708643 2024-09-15T18:08:32+00:00 The smut fungi of Greenland Denchev, Teodor T. Knudsen, Henning Denchev, Cvetomir M. 2020-03-05 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure17 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure33 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure11 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure13 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure26 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure40 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure24 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure9 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure23 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure31 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure34 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure10 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure16 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure22 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure30 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure39 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure36 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure18 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure35 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure14 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure20 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure29 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure8 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure41 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure15 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure7 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure25 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure5 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure38 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure21 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure6 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure4 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure12 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure19 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure27 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure28 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure32 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure37 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 oai:zenodo.org:3708643 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode MycoKeys, 64, 1-164, (2020-03-05) Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2020 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.4738010.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1710.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2610.3897/myc 2024-07-26T13:33:19Z The first taxonomic treatment of the smut fungi in Greenland is provided. A total of 43 species in 11 genera are treated and illustrated by photographs of sori, microphotographs of spores in LM and SEM, and distribution maps. Two species, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae and Urocystis tothii, are recorded as new from North America. Thirteen species, Anthracoidea altera, A. capillaris, A. limosa, A. liroi, A. pseudofoetidae, A. scirpoideae, A. turfosa, Microbotryum lagerheimii, M. stellariae, Schizonella elynae, Stegocintractia luzulae, Urocystis fischeri, and U. tothii, are reported for the first time from Greenland. Three new fungus-host combinations, Anthracoidea capillaris on Carex boecheriana, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae on Carex maritima, and Urocystis tothii on Juncus biglumis, are given. Five plant species are reported as new hosts of smut fungi in Greenland, namely, Carex nigra for Anthracoidea heterospora, C. canescens for Anthracoidea karii, C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Anthracoidea misandrae, C. maritima for Orphanomyces arcticus, and C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Schizonella melanogramma. Three species, Microbotryum violaceum s. str. (recorded as 'Ustilago violacea'), Urocystis anemones, and U. junci, which were previously reported from Greenland, are considered wrongly identified. Additional distribution records are given for 12 species from Greenland: Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. caricis, A. elynae, A. lindebergiae, A. misandrae, A. nardinae, A. rupestris, A. scirpi, Schizonella melanogramma, Stegocintractia hyperborea, Urocystis agropyri, and U. sorosporioides. The most numerous distribution groups are the following: circumpolar–alpine and Arctic–alpine species – 14; circumboreal–polar species – 10; and circumpolar and Arctic species – 6. The most widely distributed smut fungi in Greenland were Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. elynae, Microbotryum bistortarum, and M. vinosum. Most species were found in the High Arctic zone (29 species), while from the Low Arctic zone and the Subarctic zone, 26 and 19 ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Subarctic Zenodo MycoKeys 64 1 164 |