The smut fungi of Greenland

The first taxonomic treatment of the smut fungi in Greenland is provided. A total of 43 species in 11 genera are treated and illustrated by photographs of sori, microphotographs of spores in LM and SEM, and distribution maps. Two species, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae and Urocystis tothii, are recorde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:MycoKeys
Main Authors: Denchev, Teodor T., Knudsen, Henning, Denchev, Cvetomir M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3708643
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis
spellingShingle Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis
Denchev, Teodor T.
Knudsen, Henning
Denchev, Cvetomir M.
The smut fungi of Greenland
topic_facet Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis
description The first taxonomic treatment of the smut fungi in Greenland is provided. A total of 43 species in 11 genera are treated and illustrated by photographs of sori, microphotographs of spores in LM and SEM, and distribution maps. Two species, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae and Urocystis tothii, are recorded as new from North America. Thirteen species, Anthracoidea altera, A. capillaris, A. limosa, A. liroi, A. pseudofoetidae, A. scirpoideae, A. turfosa, Microbotryum lagerheimii, M. stellariae, Schizonella elynae, Stegocintractia luzulae, Urocystis fischeri, and U. tothii, are reported for the first time from Greenland. Three new fungus-host combinations, Anthracoidea capillaris on Carex boecheriana, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae on Carex maritima, and Urocystis tothii on Juncus biglumis, are given. Five plant species are reported as new hosts of smut fungi in Greenland, namely, Carex nigra for Anthracoidea heterospora, C. canescens for Anthracoidea karii, C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Anthracoidea misandrae, C. maritima for Orphanomyces arcticus, and C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Schizonella melanogramma. Three species, Microbotryum violaceum s. str. (recorded as 'Ustilago violacea'), Urocystis anemones, and U. junci, which were previously reported from Greenland, are considered wrongly identified. Additional distribution records are given for 12 species from Greenland: Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. caricis, A. elynae, A. lindebergiae, A. misandrae, A. nardinae, A. rupestris, A. scirpi, Schizonella melanogramma, Stegocintractia hyperborea, Urocystis agropyri, and U. sorosporioides. The most numerous distribution groups are the following: circumpolar–alpine and Arctic–alpine species – 14; circumboreal–polar species – 10; and circumpolar and Arctic species – 6. The most widely distributed smut fungi in Greenland were Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. elynae, Microbotryum bistortarum, and M. vinosum. Most species were found in the High Arctic zone (29 species), while from the Low Arctic zone and the Subarctic zone, 26 and 19 ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Denchev, Teodor T.
Knudsen, Henning
Denchev, Cvetomir M.
author_facet Denchev, Teodor T.
Knudsen, Henning
Denchev, Cvetomir M.
author_sort Denchev, Teodor T.
title The smut fungi of Greenland
title_short The smut fungi of Greenland
title_full The smut fungi of Greenland
title_fullStr The smut fungi of Greenland
title_full_unstemmed The smut fungi of Greenland
title_sort smut fungi of greenland
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380
genre Greenland
Subarctic
genre_facet Greenland
Subarctic
op_source MycoKeys, 64, 1-164, (2020-03-05)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure17
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure33
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure11
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure13
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure26
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure40
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure24
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure9
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure23
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure31
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure34
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure10
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure16
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure22
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure30
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure39
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure36
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure18
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure35
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure14
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure20
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure29
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure8
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure41
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure15
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure7
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure25
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure5
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure38
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure21
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure6
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure4
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure12
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure19
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure27
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure28
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure32
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure37
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380
oai:zenodo.org:3708643
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.4738010.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1710.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2610.3897/myc
container_title MycoKeys
container_volume 64
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 164
_version_ 1810445898464886784
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3708643 2024-09-15T18:08:32+00:00 The smut fungi of Greenland Denchev, Teodor T. Knudsen, Henning Denchev, Cvetomir M. 2020-03-05 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure17 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure33 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure11 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure13 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure26 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure40 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure24 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure9 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure23 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure31 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure34 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure10 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure16 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure22 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure30 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure39 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure36 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure18 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure35 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure14 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure20 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure29 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure8 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure41 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure15 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure7 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure25 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure5 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure38 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure21 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure6 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure4 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure12 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure19 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure27 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure28 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure32 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure37 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2 https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.47380 oai:zenodo.org:3708643 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode MycoKeys, 64, 1-164, (2020-03-05) Anthracoidea Arctic fungi Arctic–alpine fungi Microbotryum Schizonella Stegocintractia Urocystis Ustilentyloma pleuropogonis info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2020 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.64.4738010.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1710.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure3310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1110.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure1310.3897/mycokeys.64.47380.figure2610.3897/myc 2024-07-26T13:33:19Z The first taxonomic treatment of the smut fungi in Greenland is provided. A total of 43 species in 11 genera are treated and illustrated by photographs of sori, microphotographs of spores in LM and SEM, and distribution maps. Two species, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae and Urocystis tothii, are recorded as new from North America. Thirteen species, Anthracoidea altera, A. capillaris, A. limosa, A. liroi, A. pseudofoetidae, A. scirpoideae, A. turfosa, Microbotryum lagerheimii, M. stellariae, Schizonella elynae, Stegocintractia luzulae, Urocystis fischeri, and U. tothii, are reported for the first time from Greenland. Three new fungus-host combinations, Anthracoidea capillaris on Carex boecheriana, Anthracoidea pseudofoetidae on Carex maritima, and Urocystis tothii on Juncus biglumis, are given. Five plant species are reported as new hosts of smut fungi in Greenland, namely, Carex nigra for Anthracoidea heterospora, C. canescens for Anthracoidea karii, C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Anthracoidea misandrae, C. maritima for Orphanomyces arcticus, and C. fuliginosa subsp. misandra for Schizonella melanogramma. Three species, Microbotryum violaceum s. str. (recorded as 'Ustilago violacea'), Urocystis anemones, and U. junci, which were previously reported from Greenland, are considered wrongly identified. Additional distribution records are given for 12 species from Greenland: Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. caricis, A. elynae, A. lindebergiae, A. misandrae, A. nardinae, A. rupestris, A. scirpi, Schizonella melanogramma, Stegocintractia hyperborea, Urocystis agropyri, and U. sorosporioides. The most numerous distribution groups are the following: circumpolar–alpine and Arctic–alpine species – 14; circumboreal–polar species – 10; and circumpolar and Arctic species – 6. The most widely distributed smut fungi in Greenland were Anthracoidea bigelowii, A. elynae, Microbotryum bistortarum, and M. vinosum. Most species were found in the High Arctic zone (29 species), while from the Low Arctic zone and the Subarctic zone, 26 and 19 ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Subarctic Zenodo MycoKeys 64 1 164