Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges

Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) compositions in ground ice may provide information on their production mechanisms in permafrost. However, existing gas extraction methods have not been well tested. We tested conventional wet and dry gas extraction methods using ice wedges from Alaska and Siberi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang, Ji-Woong, Ahn, Jinho, Iwahana, Go, Han, Sangyoung, Kim, Kyungmin, Fedorov, Alexander
Format: Dataset
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/3701243
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701243
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3701243
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:3701243 2023-06-06T11:51:00+02:00 Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges Yang, Ji-Woong Ahn, Jinho Iwahana, Go Han, Sangyoung Kim, Kyungmin Fedorov, Alexander 2020-03-09 https://zenodo.org/record/3701243 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701243 eng eng doi:10.5281/zenodo.3701242 https://zenodo.org/record/3701243 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701243 oai:zenodo.org:3701243 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode The Cryosphere Ground ice Permafrost Methane Nitrous Oxide info:eu-repo/semantics/other dataset 2020 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.370124310.5281/zenodo.3701242 2023-04-13T23:59:29Z Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) compositions in ground ice may provide information on their production mechanisms in permafrost. However, existing gas extraction methods have not been well tested. We tested conventional wet and dry gas extraction methods using ice wedges from Alaska and Siberia, finding that both methods can extract gas from the easily extractable parts of the ice (e.g., gas bubbles), and yield similar results for CH4 and N2O mixing ratios. We also found insignificant effects of microbial activity during wet extraction. However, both techniques were unable to fully extract gas from the ground ice, presumably because gas molecules adsorbed onto or enclosed in soil aggregates are not easily extractable. Estimation of gas production in subfreezing environment of permafrost should consider such incomplete gas extraction. This project was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (NRF-2018R1A2B3003256 and NRF-2018R1A5A1024958) and the NASA ABoVE (Arctic Boreal and Vulnerability Experiment; grant no. NNX17AC57A). Dataset Arctic Ice permafrost The Cryosphere wedge* Alaska Siberia Zenodo Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language English
topic Ground ice
Permafrost
Methane
Nitrous Oxide
spellingShingle Ground ice
Permafrost
Methane
Nitrous Oxide
Yang, Ji-Woong
Ahn, Jinho
Iwahana, Go
Han, Sangyoung
Kim, Kyungmin
Fedorov, Alexander
Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
topic_facet Ground ice
Permafrost
Methane
Nitrous Oxide
description Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) compositions in ground ice may provide information on their production mechanisms in permafrost. However, existing gas extraction methods have not been well tested. We tested conventional wet and dry gas extraction methods using ice wedges from Alaska and Siberia, finding that both methods can extract gas from the easily extractable parts of the ice (e.g., gas bubbles), and yield similar results for CH4 and N2O mixing ratios. We also found insignificant effects of microbial activity during wet extraction. However, both techniques were unable to fully extract gas from the ground ice, presumably because gas molecules adsorbed onto or enclosed in soil aggregates are not easily extractable. Estimation of gas production in subfreezing environment of permafrost should consider such incomplete gas extraction. This project was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (NRF-2018R1A2B3003256 and NRF-2018R1A5A1024958) and the NASA ABoVE (Arctic Boreal and Vulnerability Experiment; grant no. NNX17AC57A).
format Dataset
author Yang, Ji-Woong
Ahn, Jinho
Iwahana, Go
Han, Sangyoung
Kim, Kyungmin
Fedorov, Alexander
author_facet Yang, Ji-Woong
Ahn, Jinho
Iwahana, Go
Han, Sangyoung
Kim, Kyungmin
Fedorov, Alexander
author_sort Yang, Ji-Woong
title Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
title_short Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
title_full Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
title_fullStr Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze CH4 and N2O compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
title_sort comparison of different gas extraction techniques to analyze ch4 and n2o compositions in gas trapped in permafrost ice wedges
publishDate 2020
url https://zenodo.org/record/3701243
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701243
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Ice
permafrost
The Cryosphere
wedge*
Alaska
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
Ice
permafrost
The Cryosphere
wedge*
Alaska
Siberia
op_source The Cryosphere
op_relation doi:10.5281/zenodo.3701242
https://zenodo.org/record/3701243
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701243
oai:zenodo.org:3701243
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.370124310.5281/zenodo.3701242
_version_ 1767956767730302976