Figure 6 from: Dehon M, Engel MS, Gérard M, Aytekin AM, Ghisbain G, Williams PH, Rasmont P, Michez D (2019) Morphometric analysis of fossil bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini) reveals their taxonomic affinities. ZooKeys 891: 71-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.891.36027

• Main Authors: Dehon, Manuel, Engel, Michael S., Gérard, Maxence, Aytekin, A. Murat, Ghisbain, Guillaume, Williams, Paul H., Rasmont, Pierre, Michez, Denis
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2019
• Subjects: Cephalornis; Coelenterata; Bilateria; Nephrozoa; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Circumscriptional names of the taxon under; Notchia; Carbotriplurida; Boltonocostidae; Circumscriptional names; Pterygota; Circumscriptional name; Basal; Eumetabola; Strashila incredibilis; Hymenopterida; Kulbastavia; Tiphiinae; Pseudaugochlora; Exebotrigona; Melecta luctuosa; Bombini; B. cerdanyensis; Alpinobombus; Animalia; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Apoidea; Apidae; Bombus; evolution; fossil; geometric morphometrics; review; taxonomy; Hines; ALPINOBOMBUS
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.891.36027.figure6

Figure 6 Hypothesis of bumble bee evolution according to the branching dates of Hines (2008) alone with the subgeneric system of Williams et al. (2008). Fossils are mapped onto the clade according to our hypotheses based on our wing morphometry/shape results. Geometric morphometric analyses should b...