Critical evaluation of faunistic data: Three species of monotrysian moths (Eriocraniidae, Prodoxidae and Incurvariidae) erroneously reported from Russia

• Published in: Nota Lepidopterologica
• Main Author: Kozlov, Mikhail V.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Pensoft Publishers 2018
• Subjects: Animalia; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Eriocranioidea; Eriocraniidae; Cephalornis; Coelenterata; Bilateria; Nephrozoa; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Circumscriptional names of the taxon under; Notchia; Carbotriplurida; Boltonocostidae; Circumscriptional names; Pterygota; Circumscriptional name; Basal; Eumetabola; Strashila incredibilis; Panorpida; Amphiesmenoptera; Porina; Galacticoidea; Dacnonypha; Incurvarioidea; Prodoxidae; Heteroneura; Monotrysia; Incurvariina; Incurvariidae; Eriocrania chrysolepidella; Incurvaria koerneriella; Incurvaria oehlmanniella; Lampronia aeneella; Lampronia rupella; misidentification; Chuvashia; Karelia; karelia*
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.41.25420

The published records of Eriocrania chrysolepidella Zeller, 1851, Incurvaria koerneriella (Zeller, 1839) and Lampronia aeneella (Heinemann, 1870) from Chuvash and Karelia Republics in Russia are based on misidentified specimens. This finding, along with earlier reports on the widespread occurrence of errors, even in the most authoritative works, calls for a critical approach to published data in order to stop spreading and citing false information across future publications.