SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944250 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11944250 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11944250 2024-09-15T17:44:03+00:00 SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment Parr McQueen, J. Gattoni, K. Gendron, E.M.S. Schmidt, S.K. Sommers, P. Porazinska, D. L. 2023-03-09 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944250 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004 lsid:urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B911FFD5FFF8FFF9FFC6FF83B42E044A https://zenodo.org/record/11644712 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944249 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944250 oai:zenodo.org:11944250 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Journal of Nematology, 55(1), 1-28, (2023-03-09) Biodiversity Taxonomy info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2023 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1194425010.2478/jofnem-2023-000410.5281/zenodo.11944249 2024-07-26T23:35:58Z SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 27, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712 Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Zenodo |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Biodiversity Taxonomy |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Parr McQueen, J. Gattoni, K. Gendron, E.M.S. Schmidt, S.K. Sommers, P. Porazinska, D. L. SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
topic_facet |
Biodiversity Taxonomy |
description |
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 27, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712 |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Parr McQueen, J. Gattoni, K. Gendron, E.M.S. Schmidt, S.K. Sommers, P. Porazinska, D. L. |
author_facet |
Parr McQueen, J. Gattoni, K. Gendron, E.M.S. Schmidt, S.K. Sommers, P. Porazinska, D. L. |
author_sort |
Parr McQueen, J. |
title |
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
title_short |
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
title_full |
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
title_fullStr |
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
SI Figure 3: Compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. Communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
title_sort |
si figure 3: compositional difference among eukaryotic microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes, using bray curtis distance matrix visualized with a nmds ordination. circles indicate each community and stars centroid location of each microbiome type. communities do not cluster by animal, microbiome type, mat type, or stream. in external and internal microbiomes of antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944250 |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic |
op_source |
Journal of Nematology, 55(1), 1-28, (2023-03-09) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004 lsid:urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B911FFD5FFF8FFF9FFC6FF83B42E044A https://zenodo.org/record/11644712 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944249 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944250 oai:zenodo.org:11944250 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1194425010.2478/jofnem-2023-000410.5281/zenodo.11944249 |
_version_ |
1810491339735826432 |