SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment

SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for eac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P., Porazinska, D. L.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2023
Subjects:
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Antarc*
Antarctic
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944242
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11944242
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11944242 2024-09-15T17:48:12+00:00 SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment Parr McQueen, J. Gattoni, K. Gendron, E.M.S. Schmidt, S.K. Sommers, P. Porazinska, D. L. 2023-03-09 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944242 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004 lsid:urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B911FFD5FFF8FFF9FFC6FF83B42E044A https://zenodo.org/record/11644712 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944241 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944242 oai:zenodo.org:11944242 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Journal of Nematology, 55(1), 1-28, (2023-03-09) Biodiversity Taxonomy info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2023 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1194424210.2478/jofnem-2023-000410.5281/zenodo.11944241 2024-07-25T21:02:42Z SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 26, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712 Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Parr McQueen, J.
Gattoni, K.
Gendron, E.M.S.
Schmidt, S.K.
Sommers, P.
Porazinska, D. L.
SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
description SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 26, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712
format Other/Unknown Material
author Parr McQueen, J.
Gattoni, K.
Gendron, E.M.S.
Schmidt, S.K.
Sommers, P.
Porazinska, D. L.
author_facet Parr McQueen, J.
Gattoni, K.
Gendron, E.M.S.
Schmidt, S.K.
Sommers, P.
Porazinska, D. L.
author_sort Parr McQueen, J.
title SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_short SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_full SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_fullStr SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_full_unstemmed SI Figure 2: Compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using Bray Curtis distance matrix visualized with a NMDS ordination. Circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. All host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (P<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_sort si figure 2: compositional differences among bacterial microinvertebrate external and internal microbiomes as well as mats they were isolated from using bray curtis distance matrix visualized with a nmds ordination. circles indicate each community and stars show centroids of microbiome types for each animal host. all host microbiomes (internal and external) are distinct from mat communities (p<0.05), but external microbiomes are more similar to mats than internal microbiomes are to mats. in external and internal microbiomes of antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944242
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Journal of Nematology, 55(1), 1-28, (2023-03-09)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004
lsid:urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B911FFD5FFF8FFF9FFC6FF83B42E044A
https://zenodo.org/record/11644712
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944241
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944242
oai:zenodo.org:11944242
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1194424210.2478/jofnem-2023-000410.5281/zenodo.11944241
_version_ 1810289357532168192

Similar Items