SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment

SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P., Porazinska, D. L.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2023
Subjects:
Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Antarc*
Antarctic
antarcticus
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944232
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11944232
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11944232 2024-09-15T17:42:51+00:00 SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment Parr McQueen, J. Gattoni, K. Gendron, E.M.S. Schmidt, S.K. Sommers, P. Porazinska, D. L. 2023-03-09 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944232 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004 lsid:urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B911FFD5FFF8FFF9FFC6FF83B42E044A https://zenodo.org/record/11644712 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944231 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944232 oai:zenodo.org:11944232 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Journal of Nematology, 55(1), 1-28, (2023-03-09) Biodiversity Taxonomy info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2023 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1194423210.2478/jofnem-2023-000410.5281/zenodo.11944231 2024-07-26T07:18:40Z SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 25, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712 Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic antarcticus Zenodo
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic Biodiversity
Taxonomy
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Parr McQueen, J.
Gattoni, K.
Gendron, E.M.S.
Schmidt, S.K.
Sommers, P.
Porazinska, D. L.
SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
topic_facet Biodiversity
Taxonomy
description SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 25, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712
format Other/Unknown Material
author Parr McQueen, J.
Gattoni, K.
Gendron, E.M.S.
Schmidt, S.K.
Sommers, P.
Porazinska, D. L.
author_facet Parr McQueen, J.
Gattoni, K.
Gendron, E.M.S.
Schmidt, S.K.
Sommers, P.
Porazinska, D. L.
author_sort Parr McQueen, J.
title SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_short SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_full SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_fullStr SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_full_unstemmed SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
title_sort si figure 1: dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on bray curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. in a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (p=0.44), but microbiome type did (p=0.03). pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of p. murrayi and tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, e. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in external and internal microbiomes of antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment
publisher Zenodo
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944232
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
antarcticus
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
antarcticus
op_source Journal of Nematology, 55(1), 1-28, (2023-03-09)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004
lsid:urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B911FFD5FFF8FFF9FFC6FF83B42E044A
https://zenodo.org/record/11644712
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944231
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944232
oai:zenodo.org:11944232
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1194423210.2478/jofnem-2023-000410.5281/zenodo.11944231
_version_ 1810489636071407616

Similar Items