SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. in External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment

• Main Authors: Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P., Porazinska, D. L.
• Format: Other/Unknown Material
• Language: unknown
• Published: Zenodo 2023
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Taxonomy; Antarc*; Antarctic; antarcticus
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11944232

SI Figure 1: Dispersion values (a boxplot using distance to centroids based on Bray Curtis distance matrix) of external and internal bacterial microbiome composition for different hosts. In a mixed linear model, microinvertebrates did not significantly impact dispersion (P=0.44), but microbiome type did (P=0.03). Pairwise contrasts show that while external microbiomes of P. murrayi and Tardigrada are more variable than their internal microbiomes, E. antarcticus external and internal microbiomes are equally variable. Published as part of Parr McQueen, J., Gattoni, K., Gendron, E.M.S., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P. & Porazinska, D. L., 2023, External and internal microbiomes of Antarctic nematodes are distinct, but more similar to each other than the surrounding environment, pp. 1-28 in Journal of Nematology 55 (1) on page 25, DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0004, http://zenodo.org/record/11644712