Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia

At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature Conservation
Main Authors: Romanov, Alexey A., Koroleva, Elena G., Dikareva, Tatyana V.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/1139274
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:1139274
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:1139274 2023-06-06T11:59:43+02:00 Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia Romanov, Alexey A. Koroleva, Elena G. Dikareva, Tatyana V. 2017-11-01 https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 oai:zenodo.org:1139274 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Nature Conservation 22 191-218 biodiversity biogeographical mapping monitoring wildlife conservation info:eu-repo/semantics/article publication-article 2017 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 2023-04-13T21:37:31Z At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that differ in the availability of distribution data. These tasks include long-term monitoring of plants and animals which are in danger of extinction, geographical analysis of biodiversity distribution and development of effective wildlife conservation strategies for specific regions. The studies of the Department of Biogeography of Moscow University on geography and biodiversity conservation are based on long-term field expeditions. The examples of the Asian Subarctic Mountains, the steppes of Central Kazakhstan and the urbanised north-west of Russia are used to illustrate Russian approaches to the use of biogeographical monitoring for the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation. The species populations of the higher plants and vertebrates listed in the Red Books have been considered as the basic units of biodiversity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Subarctic Zenodo Nature Conservation 22 191 218
institution Open Polar
collection Zenodo
op_collection_id ftzenodo
language unknown
topic biodiversity
biogeographical mapping
monitoring
wildlife conservation
spellingShingle biodiversity
biogeographical mapping
monitoring
wildlife conservation
Romanov, Alexey A.
Koroleva, Elena G.
Dikareva, Tatyana V.
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
topic_facet biodiversity
biogeographical mapping
monitoring
wildlife conservation
description At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that differ in the availability of distribution data. These tasks include long-term monitoring of plants and animals which are in danger of extinction, geographical analysis of biodiversity distribution and development of effective wildlife conservation strategies for specific regions. The studies of the Department of Biogeography of Moscow University on geography and biodiversity conservation are based on long-term field expeditions. The examples of the Asian Subarctic Mountains, the steppes of Central Kazakhstan and the urbanised north-west of Russia are used to illustrate Russian approaches to the use of biogeographical monitoring for the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation. The species populations of the higher plants and vertebrates listed in the Red Books have been considered as the basic units of biodiversity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Romanov, Alexey A.
Koroleva, Elena G.
Dikareva, Tatyana V.
author_facet Romanov, Alexey A.
Koroleva, Elena G.
Dikareva, Tatyana V.
author_sort Romanov, Alexey A.
title Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_short Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_full Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_fullStr Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_full_unstemmed Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_sort integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: case studies from the palearctic of russia
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2017
url https://zenodo.org/record/1139274
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
genre Subarctic
genre_facet Subarctic
op_source Nature Conservation 22 191-218
op_relation https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit
https://zenodo.org/record/1139274
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
oai:zenodo.org:1139274
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
container_title Nature Conservation
container_volume 22
container_start_page 191
op_container_end_page 218
_version_ 1767949894699450368