Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that di...
Published in: | Nature Conservation |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:1139274 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:1139274 2023-06-06T11:59:43+02:00 Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia Romanov, Alexey A. Koroleva, Elena G. Dikareva, Tatyana V. 2017-11-01 https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 oai:zenodo.org:1139274 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Nature Conservation 22 191-218 biodiversity biogeographical mapping monitoring wildlife conservation info:eu-repo/semantics/article publication-article 2017 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 2023-04-13T21:37:31Z At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that differ in the availability of distribution data. These tasks include long-term monitoring of plants and animals which are in danger of extinction, geographical analysis of biodiversity distribution and development of effective wildlife conservation strategies for specific regions. The studies of the Department of Biogeography of Moscow University on geography and biodiversity conservation are based on long-term field expeditions. The examples of the Asian Subarctic Mountains, the steppes of Central Kazakhstan and the urbanised north-west of Russia are used to illustrate Russian approaches to the use of biogeographical monitoring for the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation. The species populations of the higher plants and vertebrates listed in the Red Books have been considered as the basic units of biodiversity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Subarctic Zenodo Nature Conservation 22 191 218 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
unknown |
topic |
biodiversity biogeographical mapping monitoring wildlife conservation |
spellingShingle |
biodiversity biogeographical mapping monitoring wildlife conservation Romanov, Alexey A. Koroleva, Elena G. Dikareva, Tatyana V. Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia |
topic_facet |
biodiversity biogeographical mapping monitoring wildlife conservation |
description |
At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that differ in the availability of distribution data. These tasks include long-term monitoring of plants and animals which are in danger of extinction, geographical analysis of biodiversity distribution and development of effective wildlife conservation strategies for specific regions. The studies of the Department of Biogeography of Moscow University on geography and biodiversity conservation are based on long-term field expeditions. The examples of the Asian Subarctic Mountains, the steppes of Central Kazakhstan and the urbanised north-west of Russia are used to illustrate Russian approaches to the use of biogeographical monitoring for the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation. The species populations of the higher plants and vertebrates listed in the Red Books have been considered as the basic units of biodiversity. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Romanov, Alexey A. Koroleva, Elena G. Dikareva, Tatyana V. |
author_facet |
Romanov, Alexey A. Koroleva, Elena G. Dikareva, Tatyana V. |
author_sort |
Romanov, Alexey A. |
title |
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia |
title_short |
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia |
title_full |
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia |
title_fullStr |
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia |
title_sort |
integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: case studies from the palearctic of russia |
publisher |
Pensoft Publishers |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 |
genre |
Subarctic |
genre_facet |
Subarctic |
op_source |
Nature Conservation 22 191-218 |
op_relation |
https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://zenodo.org/record/1139274 https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 oai:zenodo.org:1139274 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 |
container_title |
Nature Conservation |
container_volume |
22 |
container_start_page |
191 |
op_container_end_page |
218 |
_version_ |
1767949894699450368 |