Dodia albertae Dyar 1901

Dodia albertae Dyar, 1901 (Figs 2E, F, 5D) Dodia albertae Dyar, 1901: 85. Lectotype (designated by Tshistjakov & Lafontaine 1984): ♂ (USNM). Type locality: Calgary, Alberta, [Canada], head of Pine Creek. Hypocrita atra A. Bang-Haas, 1912: 109. Lectotype (designated by Tshistjakov & Lafontain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Koshkin, Evgeny S.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11354122
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD3C5FFFA5FFA7FF6191E66A46F90B
Description
Summary:Dodia albertae Dyar, 1901 (Figs 2E, F, 5D) Dodia albertae Dyar, 1901: 85. Lectotype (designated by Tshistjakov & Lafontaine 1984): ♂ (USNM). Type locality: Calgary, Alberta, [Canada], head of Pine Creek. Hypocrita atra A. Bang-Haas, 1912: 109. Lectotype (designated by Tshistjakov & Lafontaine 1984): ♂ (ZMHB). Type locality: Arasagun-gol (Sajan) [Sayan Mountain range, Mongolia]. Hyperborea kozhantshikovi Sheljuzhko, 1918: 104. Lectotype (designated by Tshistjakov & Lafontaine 1984): ♂ (ZISP). Type locality: «in montes Dzhugdzhuz [Dzhugdzhur], ad flum. Dzhelinda» [this locality in Southern Yakutia: Uchur River Basin, Stanovoy Range (Novomodnyi & Fonova 2010)]. Material examined. 1 ♂, [USSR], Magadan surroundings, Magadanka River, 12.VII.1959 (FSCEATB); 3♂,[USSR], Magadan Oblast’, Stokovyi village, 18 km from Kulu, cedar shrub, 15.VII.1980, leg. Kononenko (FSCEATB); 1 ♂, [USSR], Magadan Oblast’, research station «Aborigen», sphagnum bog, 15.VI.1982 (FSCEATB); 13 ♂, 1 ♀, Russia, Khabarovsk Krai, Verkhnebureinsky district, Bureinsky Nature Reserve, Dusse-Alin Range, headwaters of the Pravaya Bureya River, Novyi Medvezhii cordon, 52°07’56” N, 134°17’30” E, 877 m, 25.VI–4.VII.2016, leg. Evgeny S. Koshkin (EKC); 3 ♂, 1 ♀, same locality and collector, but 3–6.VII.2018 (EKC); 1 ♂, same locality and collector, but 23.VI.2020 (EKC); 1 ♂, same locality and collector, but 9.VII.2020 (EKC). Diagnosis. Externally similar to Dodia tarandus and D. verticalis . It differs from D. tarandus in the coloration of the basal and antemedial areas of the forewing, which are never paler than the outer half of the wing (Figs 2E, F); male valva apex with two short, blunt or weakly pointed processes; juxta wider than long; everted vesica about as long as aedeagus (Fig. 5D) (Schmidt & Macaulay 2009). It is distinguished from D. verticalis by oblique transverse light bands on the forewings. Among the Asian species of the genus Dodia , only D. zhenya sp. n. is somewhat similar to D. albertae , differing from it in the ...