Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932
Chaenophryne draco Beebe, 1932 (Figs. 1E, 4) Diagnosis. Among the five valid species of Chaenophryne , C. draco , C. longiceps Regan, 1925 and C. ramifera Regan & Trewavas, 1932 are reported from the Atlantic Ocean (Pietsch, 1975, 2009). Females of Chaenophryne draco differ from all other congen...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960640 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 |
id |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:10960640 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:10960640 2024-09-15T18:10:12+00:00 Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 Mincarone, Michael Maia Afonso, Gabriel Vinícius Felix Di Dario, Fabio Eduardo, Leandro Nolé Frédou, Thierry Lucena-Frédou, Flávia Bertrand, Arnaud Pietsch, Theodore Wells 2021-06-11 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960640 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 unknown Zenodo https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0151 http://zenodo.org/record/11050422 http://publication.plazi.org/id/A14EC3460F2CFFE7FFCBFF90DB4EFFAC https://sibils.text-analytics.ch/search/collections/plazi/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 https://www.gbif.org/species/226524309 https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/294600/taxon/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47.taxon https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11050425 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11050434 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960639 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960640 oai:zenodo.org:10960640 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode Deep-sea anglerfishes (Lophiiformes: Ceratioidei) from off northeastern Brazil, with remarks on the ceratioids reported from the Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone, pp. 1-28 in Neotropical Ichthyology, 19(2), 12, (2021-06-11) Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Chordata Lophiiformes Oneirodidae Chaenophryne Chaenophryne draco info:eu-repo/semantics/other 2021 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096064010.1590/1982-0224-2020-015110.5281/zenodo.1105042510.5281/zenodo.1105043410.5281/zenodo.10960639 2024-07-25T09:45:53Z Chaenophryne draco Beebe, 1932 (Figs. 1E, 4) Diagnosis. Among the five valid species of Chaenophryne , C. draco , C. longiceps Regan, 1925 and C. ramifera Regan & Trewavas, 1932 are reported from the Atlantic Ocean (Pietsch, 1975, 2009). Females of Chaenophryne draco differ from all other congeners by the absence of anterolateral escal appendages ( vs . esca with 1–3 anterolateral appendages on each side), and ratio of number of teeth in upper and lower jaws in specimens 20 mm or larger (1.08–1.45 vs . 0.76–1.30). The species is further distinguished from C. longiceps by having esca with an unpaired internally pigmented anterior appendage ( vs . esca with a pair of internally pigmented anterior appendages); width of escal bulb 2.1–6.6% SL in specimens larger than 20 mm ( vs . width of escal bulb 5.3–11.4% SL in specimens larger than 20 mm); pectoral-fin rays 16–19, rarely more than 18 ( vs . 17–22, rarely less than 18). Chaenophryne draco also seems to differ from C. ramifera by a slightly shorter illicium (24.0–36.4% SL vs . 32.8–47.4% SL) and by fewer dorsal-fin rays (6–8 vs . 7–8) (Pietsch, 1975; Pietsch, 2007, 2009). Geographical distribution. Chaenophryne draco is widespread in the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans. In the Atlantic, it has been reported from Greenland to Cape Verde, with additional records from off Cape Town, South Africa, and off Espírito Santo State, Brazil (MNRJ 30707, 19º43’40”S 38º39’50”W; Pietsch, 1975, 2009; Sutton et al ., 2008; Porteiro et al ., 2017). Species is reported here based on two specimens collected off Pernambuco State and Rocas Atoll, between depths of 680 and 984 m (Fig. 4). Material examined. NPM 4954, 1, 90 mm (Fig. 1E), RV Antea , sta. AB2/16, 7°36’15.0”S 33°59’30.0”W to 7°36’49.3”S 33°57’18.7”W, 680 m, 14 Apr 2017, 21:53– 22:39 h; NPM 4969, 1, 55 mm, RV Antea , sta. AB2/52A, 3°43’16.2”S 33°25’09.8”W to 3°42’14.2”S 33°24’36.2”W, 822–984 m, 2 May 2017, 11:47–12:18 h. Published as part of Mincarone, Michael Maia, Afonso, Gabriel Vinícius Felix, Di Dario, ... Other/Unknown Material Greenland Zenodo |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Zenodo |
op_collection_id |
ftzenodo |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Chordata Lophiiformes Oneirodidae Chaenophryne Chaenophryne draco |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Chordata Lophiiformes Oneirodidae Chaenophryne Chaenophryne draco Mincarone, Michael Maia Afonso, Gabriel Vinícius Felix Di Dario, Fabio Eduardo, Leandro Nolé Frédou, Thierry Lucena-Frédou, Flávia Bertrand, Arnaud Pietsch, Theodore Wells Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 |
topic_facet |
Biodiversity Taxonomy Animalia Chordata Lophiiformes Oneirodidae Chaenophryne Chaenophryne draco |
description |
Chaenophryne draco Beebe, 1932 (Figs. 1E, 4) Diagnosis. Among the five valid species of Chaenophryne , C. draco , C. longiceps Regan, 1925 and C. ramifera Regan & Trewavas, 1932 are reported from the Atlantic Ocean (Pietsch, 1975, 2009). Females of Chaenophryne draco differ from all other congeners by the absence of anterolateral escal appendages ( vs . esca with 1–3 anterolateral appendages on each side), and ratio of number of teeth in upper and lower jaws in specimens 20 mm or larger (1.08–1.45 vs . 0.76–1.30). The species is further distinguished from C. longiceps by having esca with an unpaired internally pigmented anterior appendage ( vs . esca with a pair of internally pigmented anterior appendages); width of escal bulb 2.1–6.6% SL in specimens larger than 20 mm ( vs . width of escal bulb 5.3–11.4% SL in specimens larger than 20 mm); pectoral-fin rays 16–19, rarely more than 18 ( vs . 17–22, rarely less than 18). Chaenophryne draco also seems to differ from C. ramifera by a slightly shorter illicium (24.0–36.4% SL vs . 32.8–47.4% SL) and by fewer dorsal-fin rays (6–8 vs . 7–8) (Pietsch, 1975; Pietsch, 2007, 2009). Geographical distribution. Chaenophryne draco is widespread in the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans. In the Atlantic, it has been reported from Greenland to Cape Verde, with additional records from off Cape Town, South Africa, and off Espírito Santo State, Brazil (MNRJ 30707, 19º43’40”S 38º39’50”W; Pietsch, 1975, 2009; Sutton et al ., 2008; Porteiro et al ., 2017). Species is reported here based on two specimens collected off Pernambuco State and Rocas Atoll, between depths of 680 and 984 m (Fig. 4). Material examined. NPM 4954, 1, 90 mm (Fig. 1E), RV Antea , sta. AB2/16, 7°36’15.0”S 33°59’30.0”W to 7°36’49.3”S 33°57’18.7”W, 680 m, 14 Apr 2017, 21:53– 22:39 h; NPM 4969, 1, 55 mm, RV Antea , sta. AB2/52A, 3°43’16.2”S 33°25’09.8”W to 3°42’14.2”S 33°24’36.2”W, 822–984 m, 2 May 2017, 11:47–12:18 h. Published as part of Mincarone, Michael Maia, Afonso, Gabriel Vinícius Felix, Di Dario, ... |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Mincarone, Michael Maia Afonso, Gabriel Vinícius Felix Di Dario, Fabio Eduardo, Leandro Nolé Frédou, Thierry Lucena-Frédou, Flávia Bertrand, Arnaud Pietsch, Theodore Wells |
author_facet |
Mincarone, Michael Maia Afonso, Gabriel Vinícius Felix Di Dario, Fabio Eduardo, Leandro Nolé Frédou, Thierry Lucena-Frédou, Flávia Bertrand, Arnaud Pietsch, Theodore Wells |
author_sort |
Mincarone, Michael Maia |
title |
Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 |
title_short |
Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 |
title_full |
Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 |
title_fullStr |
Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chaenophryne draco Beebe 1932 |
title_sort |
chaenophryne draco beebe 1932 |
publisher |
Zenodo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960640 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 |
genre |
Greenland |
genre_facet |
Greenland |
op_source |
Deep-sea anglerfishes (Lophiiformes: Ceratioidei) from off northeastern Brazil, with remarks on the ceratioids reported from the Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone, pp. 1-28 in Neotropical Ichthyology, 19(2), 12, (2021-06-11) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0151 http://zenodo.org/record/11050422 http://publication.plazi.org/id/A14EC3460F2CFFE7FFCBFF90DB4EFFAC https://sibils.text-analytics.ch/search/collections/plazi/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 https://www.gbif.org/species/226524309 https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/294600/taxon/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47.taxon https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11050425 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11050434 https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960639 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960640 oai:zenodo.org:10960640 http://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D77BB3E0F27FFECFCC8FF2EDFA6FB47 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096064010.1590/1982-0224-2020-015110.5281/zenodo.1105042510.5281/zenodo.1105043410.5281/zenodo.10960639 |
_version_ |
1810447799899127808 |