Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.

Philopatry, site tenacity, and mate fidelity were examined in a 5-yr study of a population of male-territorial, monogamous Semipalmated Sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) breeding at La Perouse Bay, near Churchill, Manitoba. There was no sex bias in natal philopatry and no significant difference in adult...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gratto, C.L., Morrison, R.I.G., Cooke, F.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of California Press 1985
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10315/13770
id ftyorkuniv:oai:yorkspace.library.yorku.ca:10315/13770
record_format openpolar
spelling ftyorkuniv:oai:yorkspace.library.yorku.ca:10315/13770 2023-05-15T15:55:08+02:00 Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper. Gratto, C.L. Morrison, R.I.G. Cooke, F. 1985 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10315/13770 en eng University of California Press The Auk 102:16-24.1985 http://hdl.handle.net/10315/13770 http://www.aou.org/auk/ http://www.jstor.org/stable/4086818 PHILOPATRY SITE TENACITY MATE FIDELITY THE SEMIPALMATED SANDPIPER Article 1985 ftyorkuniv 2022-08-22T12:58:18Z Philopatry, site tenacity, and mate fidelity were examined in a 5-yr study of a population of male-territorial, monogamous Semipalmated Sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) breeding at La Perouse Bay, near Churchill, Manitoba. There was no sex bias in natal philopatry and no significant difference in adult philopatry, although males tended to return to the breeding area at higher frequencies than females. However, males nested significantly closer to previous nests than did females. Pairs that had reunited did not move as far from their previous nest site as birds that had changed mates, and this effect was more pronounced in females. Birds that had nested successfully the previous year returned at higher rates than those that had been unsuccessful. However, there was no significant difference in distance moved from a previously successful vs. unsuccessful nest. There also was no significant difference in site tenacity when distances one and two years or two and three years apart were compared. However, nest distances increased significantly when three years had elapsed between utilization of sites. Each year approximately 50% of the marked birds in the study area had reunited with their mate of the previous year. If both members of the pair returned, close to 80% remained paired. There was no tendency for birds that had "divorced" to have been less successful nesters in the previous year, compared to pairs that had reunited. Subsequent nesting success was not significantly different between birds that had changed or retained mates. However, in 1 of 4 yr, nests of pairs that had changed mates hatched significantly later than did those of remated pairs. Received 23 April 1984, accepted 4 October 1984. Article in Journal/Newspaper Churchill York University, Toronto: YorkSpace
institution Open Polar
collection York University, Toronto: YorkSpace
op_collection_id ftyorkuniv
language English
topic PHILOPATRY
SITE TENACITY
MATE FIDELITY
THE SEMIPALMATED SANDPIPER
spellingShingle PHILOPATRY
SITE TENACITY
MATE FIDELITY
THE SEMIPALMATED SANDPIPER
Gratto, C.L.
Morrison, R.I.G.
Cooke, F.
Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
topic_facet PHILOPATRY
SITE TENACITY
MATE FIDELITY
THE SEMIPALMATED SANDPIPER
description Philopatry, site tenacity, and mate fidelity were examined in a 5-yr study of a population of male-territorial, monogamous Semipalmated Sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) breeding at La Perouse Bay, near Churchill, Manitoba. There was no sex bias in natal philopatry and no significant difference in adult philopatry, although males tended to return to the breeding area at higher frequencies than females. However, males nested significantly closer to previous nests than did females. Pairs that had reunited did not move as far from their previous nest site as birds that had changed mates, and this effect was more pronounced in females. Birds that had nested successfully the previous year returned at higher rates than those that had been unsuccessful. However, there was no significant difference in distance moved from a previously successful vs. unsuccessful nest. There also was no significant difference in site tenacity when distances one and two years or two and three years apart were compared. However, nest distances increased significantly when three years had elapsed between utilization of sites. Each year approximately 50% of the marked birds in the study area had reunited with their mate of the previous year. If both members of the pair returned, close to 80% remained paired. There was no tendency for birds that had "divorced" to have been less successful nesters in the previous year, compared to pairs that had reunited. Subsequent nesting success was not significantly different between birds that had changed or retained mates. However, in 1 of 4 yr, nests of pairs that had changed mates hatched significantly later than did those of remated pairs. Received 23 April 1984, accepted 4 October 1984.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gratto, C.L.
Morrison, R.I.G.
Cooke, F.
author_facet Gratto, C.L.
Morrison, R.I.G.
Cooke, F.
author_sort Gratto, C.L.
title Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
title_short Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
title_full Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
title_fullStr Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
title_full_unstemmed Philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
title_sort philopatry, site tenacity and mate fidelity in the semipalmated sandpiper.
publisher University of California Press
publishDate 1985
url http://hdl.handle.net/10315/13770
genre Churchill
genre_facet Churchill
op_relation The Auk 102:16-24.1985
http://hdl.handle.net/10315/13770
op_rights http://www.aou.org/auk/
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4086818
_version_ 1766390468214521856