Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North

Since the early part of the 20th century, the federal government has engaged in a long and slow process of devolution in the Canadian Arctic. Although the range of powers devolved to the territorial governments has been substantial over the years, the federal government still maintains control over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alcantara, Christopher
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Scholars Commons @ Laurier 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholars.wlu.ca/poli_faculty/30
https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=poli_faculty
id ftwlaurieruniv:oai:scholars.wlu.ca:poli_faculty-1029
record_format openpolar
spelling ftwlaurieruniv:oai:scholars.wlu.ca:poli_faculty-1029 2023-05-15T15:00:36+02:00 Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North Alcantara, Christopher 2012-02-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholars.wlu.ca/poli_faculty/30 https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=poli_faculty unknown Scholars Commons @ Laurier https://scholars.wlu.ca/poli_faculty/30 https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=poli_faculty Political Science Faculty Publications devolution territorial governance Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut federal-provincial-territorial relations Comparative Politics Political Science text 2012 ftwlaurieruniv 2022-03-31T17:28:43Z Since the early part of the 20th century, the federal government has engaged in a long and slow process of devolution in the Canadian Arctic. Although the range of powers devolved to the territorial governments has been substantial over the years, the federal government still maintains control over the single most important jurisdiction in the region, territorial lands and resources, which it controls in two of the three territories, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. This fact is significant for territorial governments because gaining jurisdiction over their lands and resources is seen as necessary for dramatically improving the lives of residents and governments in the Canadian north. Relying on archival materials, secondary sources, and 33 elite interviews, this paper uses a rational choice framework to explain why the Yukon territorial government was able to complete a final devolution agreement relating to lands and resources in 2001 and why the governments of the Northwest Territories and Nunavut have not. It finds that the nature and distance of federal-territorial preferences, combined with government perceptions of aboriginal consent and federal perceptions of territorial capacity and maturity, explain the divergent outcomes experienced by the three territorial governments in the Canadian arctic. The following acronyms are employed: AIP: Agreement-in-Principle; DTA: Devolution Transfer Agreement; GEB: gross expenditure base; GN: Government of Nunavut; GNWT: Government of Northwest Territories; NCLA: Nunavut Land Claims Agreement; NTI: Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated; NWT; Northwest Territories; ON: Ontario; TFF: Territorial Formula Financing; UFA: Umbrella Final Agreement; YDTA: Yukon Devolution Transfer Agreement; YTG: Yukon Territorial Government; YK: Yukon; Text Arctic Northwest Territories Nunavut Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Yukon Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario: Scholars Commons@Laurier Arctic Northwest Territories Nunavut Yukon
institution Open Polar
collection Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario: Scholars Commons@Laurier
op_collection_id ftwlaurieruniv
language unknown
topic devolution
territorial governance
Yukon Territory
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
federal-provincial-territorial relations
Comparative Politics
Political Science
spellingShingle devolution
territorial governance
Yukon Territory
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
federal-provincial-territorial relations
Comparative Politics
Political Science
Alcantara, Christopher
Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North
topic_facet devolution
territorial governance
Yukon Territory
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
federal-provincial-territorial relations
Comparative Politics
Political Science
description Since the early part of the 20th century, the federal government has engaged in a long and slow process of devolution in the Canadian Arctic. Although the range of powers devolved to the territorial governments has been substantial over the years, the federal government still maintains control over the single most important jurisdiction in the region, territorial lands and resources, which it controls in two of the three territories, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. This fact is significant for territorial governments because gaining jurisdiction over their lands and resources is seen as necessary for dramatically improving the lives of residents and governments in the Canadian north. Relying on archival materials, secondary sources, and 33 elite interviews, this paper uses a rational choice framework to explain why the Yukon territorial government was able to complete a final devolution agreement relating to lands and resources in 2001 and why the governments of the Northwest Territories and Nunavut have not. It finds that the nature and distance of federal-territorial preferences, combined with government perceptions of aboriginal consent and federal perceptions of territorial capacity and maturity, explain the divergent outcomes experienced by the three territorial governments in the Canadian arctic. The following acronyms are employed: AIP: Agreement-in-Principle; DTA: Devolution Transfer Agreement; GEB: gross expenditure base; GN: Government of Nunavut; GNWT: Government of Northwest Territories; NCLA: Nunavut Land Claims Agreement; NTI: Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated; NWT; Northwest Territories; ON: Ontario; TFF: Territorial Formula Financing; UFA: Umbrella Final Agreement; YDTA: Yukon Devolution Transfer Agreement; YTG: Yukon Territorial Government; YK: Yukon;
format Text
author Alcantara, Christopher
author_facet Alcantara, Christopher
author_sort Alcantara, Christopher
title Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North
title_short Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North
title_full Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North
title_fullStr Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North
title_full_unstemmed Preferences, Perceptions, and Veto Players: Explaining Devolution Negotiation Outcomes in the Canadian Territorial North
title_sort preferences, perceptions, and veto players: explaining devolution negotiation outcomes in the canadian territorial north
publisher Scholars Commons @ Laurier
publishDate 2012
url https://scholars.wlu.ca/poli_faculty/30
https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=poli_faculty
geographic Arctic
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Yukon
geographic_facet Arctic
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Yukon
genre Arctic
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Nunavut Land Claims Agreement
Yukon
genre_facet Arctic
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
Nunavut Land Claims Agreement
Yukon
op_source Political Science Faculty Publications
op_relation https://scholars.wlu.ca/poli_faculty/30
https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=poli_faculty
_version_ 1766332686163509248