Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season

Colonial waterbirds are highly visible components of coastal avifaunas that share the unusual characteristic of nesting in dense assemblages. One consequence of having large portions of populations nesting in few locations is that even restricted disturbance may have profound consequences on a popul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Watts, B. D., Paxton, B J
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: W&M ScholarWorks 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports/359
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ccb_reports
id ftwilliammarycol:oai:scholarworks.wm.edu:ccb_reports-1358
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection W&M ScholarWorks
op_collection_id ftwilliammarycol
language unknown
description Colonial waterbirds are highly visible components of coastal avifaunas that share the unusual characteristic of nesting in dense assemblages. One consequence of having large portions of populations nesting in few locations is that even restricted disturbance may have profound consequences on a population level. Development of conservation strategies for these sensitive species requires current status and distribution information. During the breeding seasons of 1993 and 2003, a comprehensive assessment of the colonial waterbird community in coastal Virginia was conducted with the purpose of providing information needed for strategic management and future trend analysis. During the spring of 2007, a decision was made by a consortium of partners to conduct a third assessment on the 5th anniversary of the 2003 survey. Due to funding constraints, the 2008 survey did not cover the widely dispersed colonies of Great Blue Herons and Great Egrets in the interior of the western shore or within the portion of the Coastal Plain south of the James River. For this reason, the 2008 survey produced comparable population assessments for 22 of the 24 colonial waterbird species known to nest in Virginia. Nearly 550 surveys were conducted of 250 colonies during the breeding season of 2008. Colonies supported an estimated 60,758 breeding pairs of 24 species. Gulls were the most abundant group with more than 40,000 breeding pairs. Terns and waders accounted for 9,455 and 4,763 pairs respectively. Laughing gulls were several times more abundant than any other species and represented 61% of the total waterbird community. The barrier island/lagoon system of the Eastern Shore was the most important region for the majority of colonial species encountered. This region supported 20 of the 23 species evaluated during the survey and accounted for greater than 74% and 70% of all breeding pairs and colonies, respectively. For 15 of the 23 species, the region supported more than 50% of the known coastal population. The colonial waterbird community in coastal Virginia that was assessed during this survey (all species except Great Blue Heron and Great Egret) declined by 28.9% during the 15 years between 1993 and 2004 (Table 3). Population estimates for 14 of 22 species assessed declined since 1993 and 11 of these have declined since the 2003 survey. Declines varied considerably between species with 10 species declining more than 40% and 4 species declining more than 70%. Cattle Egrets showed the highest loss rate, declining from an estimated 1,459 to only 120 pairs. Eight species increased between 1993 and 2008. Dramatic expansions were documented for White Ibis, Great Black-backed Gull, Double-crested Cormorant, and Brown Pelican. The seaside of the Delmarva Peninsula is the most important region for colonial waterbirds in Virginia. Despite heroic efforts to manage several species, declines have not been abated. Collectively, the waterbird community has declined 33% between 1993 and 2008. Snowy Egret, Tricolored Heron, Cattle Egret, Green Heron, Yellow-crowned Night Heron, Glossy Ibis, Herring Gull, Laughing Gull, Gull-billed Tern, Royal Tern, Forster’s Tern, Common Tern, and Black Skimmer all showed a consistent decline across this period. Only species that have colonized the area since 1970 including White Ibis, Great Black-backed Gull, Doublecrested Cormorant, and Brown Pelican have exhibited consistent increases. The ecological differences between species showing declines suggest a system-wide problem that is greater than the mammalian predators that have been the focus of recent management actions.
format Text
author Watts, B. D.
Paxton, B J
spellingShingle Watts, B. D.
Paxton, B J
Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season
author_facet Watts, B. D.
Paxton, B J
author_sort Watts, B. D.
title Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season
title_short Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season
title_full Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season
title_fullStr Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season
title_full_unstemmed Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season
title_sort status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal virginia: 2008 breeding season
publisher W&M ScholarWorks
publishDate 2009
url https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports/359
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ccb_reports
long_lat ENVELOPE(78.396,78.396,-68.431,-68.431)
ENVELOPE(-108.786,-108.786,67.217,67.217)
geographic Barrier Island
James River
geographic_facet Barrier Island
James River
genre Common tern
genre_facet Common tern
op_source CCB Technical Reports
op_relation https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports/359
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ccb_reports
_version_ 1766391812197449728
spelling ftwilliammarycol:oai:scholarworks.wm.edu:ccb_reports-1358 2023-05-15T15:56:22+02:00 Status and distribution of colonial waterbirds in coastal Virginia: 2008 breeding season Watts, B. D. Paxton, B J 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports/359 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ccb_reports unknown W&M ScholarWorks https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports/359 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ccb_reports CCB Technical Reports text 2009 ftwilliammarycol 2021-01-03T17:18:14Z Colonial waterbirds are highly visible components of coastal avifaunas that share the unusual characteristic of nesting in dense assemblages. One consequence of having large portions of populations nesting in few locations is that even restricted disturbance may have profound consequences on a population level. Development of conservation strategies for these sensitive species requires current status and distribution information. During the breeding seasons of 1993 and 2003, a comprehensive assessment of the colonial waterbird community in coastal Virginia was conducted with the purpose of providing information needed for strategic management and future trend analysis. During the spring of 2007, a decision was made by a consortium of partners to conduct a third assessment on the 5th anniversary of the 2003 survey. Due to funding constraints, the 2008 survey did not cover the widely dispersed colonies of Great Blue Herons and Great Egrets in the interior of the western shore or within the portion of the Coastal Plain south of the James River. For this reason, the 2008 survey produced comparable population assessments for 22 of the 24 colonial waterbird species known to nest in Virginia. Nearly 550 surveys were conducted of 250 colonies during the breeding season of 2008. Colonies supported an estimated 60,758 breeding pairs of 24 species. Gulls were the most abundant group with more than 40,000 breeding pairs. Terns and waders accounted for 9,455 and 4,763 pairs respectively. Laughing gulls were several times more abundant than any other species and represented 61% of the total waterbird community. The barrier island/lagoon system of the Eastern Shore was the most important region for the majority of colonial species encountered. This region supported 20 of the 23 species evaluated during the survey and accounted for greater than 74% and 70% of all breeding pairs and colonies, respectively. For 15 of the 23 species, the region supported more than 50% of the known coastal population. The colonial waterbird community in coastal Virginia that was assessed during this survey (all species except Great Blue Heron and Great Egret) declined by 28.9% during the 15 years between 1993 and 2004 (Table 3). Population estimates for 14 of 22 species assessed declined since 1993 and 11 of these have declined since the 2003 survey. Declines varied considerably between species with 10 species declining more than 40% and 4 species declining more than 70%. Cattle Egrets showed the highest loss rate, declining from an estimated 1,459 to only 120 pairs. Eight species increased between 1993 and 2008. Dramatic expansions were documented for White Ibis, Great Black-backed Gull, Double-crested Cormorant, and Brown Pelican. The seaside of the Delmarva Peninsula is the most important region for colonial waterbirds in Virginia. Despite heroic efforts to manage several species, declines have not been abated. Collectively, the waterbird community has declined 33% between 1993 and 2008. Snowy Egret, Tricolored Heron, Cattle Egret, Green Heron, Yellow-crowned Night Heron, Glossy Ibis, Herring Gull, Laughing Gull, Gull-billed Tern, Royal Tern, Forster’s Tern, Common Tern, and Black Skimmer all showed a consistent decline across this period. Only species that have colonized the area since 1970 including White Ibis, Great Black-backed Gull, Doublecrested Cormorant, and Brown Pelican have exhibited consistent increases. The ecological differences between species showing declines suggest a system-wide problem that is greater than the mammalian predators that have been the focus of recent management actions. Text Common tern W&M ScholarWorks Barrier Island ENVELOPE(78.396,78.396,-68.431,-68.431) James River ENVELOPE(-108.786,-108.786,67.217,67.217)