The Atlantic Water boundary current north of Svalbard in late summer

• Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
• Main Authors: Perez-Hernandez, M. Dolores, Pickart, Robert S., Pavlov, Vladimir, Våge, Kjetil, Ingvaldsen, Randi B., Sundfjord, Arild, Renner, Angelika H. H., Torres, Daniel J., Erofeeva, Svetlana Y.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: John Wiley & Sons 2017
• Subjects: Atlantic Water; Arctic Ocean; Kvitøya Trough; Nansen Basin; Svalbard Branch; A-TWAIN; Arctic; Svalbard; Yermak Plateau; Fram Strait; Kvitøya; Yermak plateau
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/1912/9004

Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2017. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122 (2017): 2269–2290, doi:10.1002/2016JC012486. Data from a shipboard hydrographic/velocity survey carried out in September 2013 of the region north of Svalbard in the Nansen Basin are analyzed to characterize the Atlantic Water (AW) boundary current as it flows eastward along the continental slope. Eight meridional transects across the current, spanning an alongstream distance of 180 km, allow for a detailed description of the current and the regional water masses. During the survey the winds were light and there was no pack-ice. The mean section reveals that the boundary current was O(40 km) wide, surface-intensified, with a maximum velocity of 20 cm/s. Its mean transport during the survey was 3.11 ± 0.33 Sv, of which 2.31 ± 0.29 Sv was AW. This suggests that the two branches of AW entering the Arctic Ocean via Fram Strait—the Yermak Plateau branch and the Svalbard branch—have largely combined into a single current by 30°E. At this location the boundary current meanders with a systematic change in its kinematic structure during offshore excursions. A potential vorticity analysis indicates that the flow is baroclinically unstable, consistent with previous observations of AW anticyclones offshore of the current as well as the presence of a near-field cyclone in this data set. Our survey indicates that only a small portion of the boundary current is diverted into the Kvitøya Trough (0.17 ± 0.08 Sv) and that the AW temperature/salinity signal is quickly eroded within the trough. National Science Foundation Grant Number: ARC-1264098 2017-09-21