Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?

This study examined the licensing system that permits seal shooting in Scotland, which was established under Part 6 Conservation of Seals of the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010. Four approaches were used: data were collated and analyzed from both the Scottish Government and Scottish Marine Animal Strandi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nunny, Laetitia, Langford, Fritha, Simmonds, Mark P.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: WBI Studies Repository 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/aqufis/1
https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=aqufis
id ftwellbeing:oai:www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org:aqufis-1000
record_format openpolar
spelling ftwellbeing:oai:www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org:aqufis-1000 2023-05-15T15:56:09+02:00 Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare? Nunny, Laetitia Langford, Fritha Simmonds, Mark P. 2016-08-23T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/aqufis/1 https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=aqufis unknown WBI Studies Repository https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/aqufis/1 https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=aqufis Aquaculture and Fisheries Collection gray seal common seal harbor seal seal management fish farm fishery welfare aquaculture Agribusiness Animal Studies Aquaculture and Fisheries text 2016 ftwellbeing 2022-07-11T18:34:04Z This study examined the licensing system that permits seal shooting in Scotland, which was established under Part 6 Conservation of Seals of the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010. Four approaches were used: data were collated and analyzed from both the Scottish Government and Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme; a survey was sent to current license holders and informal interviews were conducted with key stakeholder types. Between February 2011 and the end of October 2015, 1229 gray seals, and 275 common seals were reported shot under license to the Scottish Government. The numbers of seals reported as shot has reduced year-on-year since the licensing system was put in place. While some license holders, notably fish farms, were using some non-lethal forms of deterrent to reduce seal-related damage, these were often used alongside seal shooting. Of the seals reported as shot to the Scottish Government, only a small percentage were also reported to the Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme, despite this being a licensing requirement. Only 2.3% of the shot gray seals and 4.5% of the shot common seals were necropsied. There is evidence from these necropsies that some seals had not died instantly or had not been shot in the manner recommended by the Scottish Seal Management Code of Practice. These preliminary results show that more carcasses need to be recovered and necropsied if the welfare implications of current seal shooting practice are to be properly assessed. The current legislation does not specify closed seasons to protect breeding seals and 35% of necropsied seals were pregnant gray seals. Seals have also been shot during their lactation periods when pups are dependent on their mothers. This raises significant welfare concerns. The re-introduction of closed seasons specific to each species of seal is recommended along with greater effort to deploy non-lethal methods. Independent assessment of the number of seals being killed would also improve the credibility of the system. Text common seal harbor seal WBI Studies Repository (WellBeing International)
institution Open Polar
collection WBI Studies Repository (WellBeing International)
op_collection_id ftwellbeing
language unknown
topic gray seal
common seal
harbor seal
seal management
fish farm
fishery
welfare
aquaculture
Agribusiness
Animal Studies
Aquaculture and Fisheries
spellingShingle gray seal
common seal
harbor seal
seal management
fish farm
fishery
welfare
aquaculture
Agribusiness
Animal Studies
Aquaculture and Fisheries
Nunny, Laetitia
Langford, Fritha
Simmonds, Mark P.
Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?
topic_facet gray seal
common seal
harbor seal
seal management
fish farm
fishery
welfare
aquaculture
Agribusiness
Animal Studies
Aquaculture and Fisheries
description This study examined the licensing system that permits seal shooting in Scotland, which was established under Part 6 Conservation of Seals of the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010. Four approaches were used: data were collated and analyzed from both the Scottish Government and Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme; a survey was sent to current license holders and informal interviews were conducted with key stakeholder types. Between February 2011 and the end of October 2015, 1229 gray seals, and 275 common seals were reported shot under license to the Scottish Government. The numbers of seals reported as shot has reduced year-on-year since the licensing system was put in place. While some license holders, notably fish farms, were using some non-lethal forms of deterrent to reduce seal-related damage, these were often used alongside seal shooting. Of the seals reported as shot to the Scottish Government, only a small percentage were also reported to the Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme, despite this being a licensing requirement. Only 2.3% of the shot gray seals and 4.5% of the shot common seals were necropsied. There is evidence from these necropsies that some seals had not died instantly or had not been shot in the manner recommended by the Scottish Seal Management Code of Practice. These preliminary results show that more carcasses need to be recovered and necropsied if the welfare implications of current seal shooting practice are to be properly assessed. The current legislation does not specify closed seasons to protect breeding seals and 35% of necropsied seals were pregnant gray seals. Seals have also been shot during their lactation periods when pups are dependent on their mothers. This raises significant welfare concerns. The re-introduction of closed seasons specific to each species of seal is recommended along with greater effort to deploy non-lethal methods. Independent assessment of the number of seals being killed would also improve the credibility of the system.
format Text
author Nunny, Laetitia
Langford, Fritha
Simmonds, Mark P.
author_facet Nunny, Laetitia
Langford, Fritha
Simmonds, Mark P.
author_sort Nunny, Laetitia
title Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?
title_short Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?
title_full Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?
title_fullStr Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Seal Licensing System in Scotland Have a Negative Impact on Seal Welfare?
title_sort does the seal licensing system in scotland have a negative impact on seal welfare?
publisher WBI Studies Repository
publishDate 2016
url https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/aqufis/1
https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=aqufis
genre common seal
harbor seal
genre_facet common seal
harbor seal
op_source Aquaculture and Fisheries Collection
op_relation https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/aqufis/1
https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=aqufis
_version_ 1766391622096912384