Alpine hillslope failure in the western US: insights from the Chaos Canyon landslide, Rocky Mountain National Park, USA

• Published in: Earth Surface Dynamics
• Main Authors: Morriss, Matthew C., Lehmann, Benjamin, Campforts, Benjamin, Brencher, George, Rick, Brianna, Anderson, Leif S., Handwerger, Alexander L., Overeem, Irina, Moore, Jeffrey
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2023
• Subjects: Ice; permafrost
• Online Access: https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/8e638c4d-ad1c-45d7-81b6-19c379629f0c; https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1251-2023; https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/8e638c4d-ad1c-45d7-81b6-19c379629f0c; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180589163&partnerID=8YFLogxK; http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85180589163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

The Chaos Canyon landslide, which collapsed on the afternoon of 28 June 2022 in Rocky Mountain National Park, presents an opportunity to evaluate instabilities within alpine regions faced with a warming and dynamic climate. Video documentation of the landslide was captured by several eyewitnesses and motivated a rapid field campaign. Initial estimates put the failure area at 66 630 m 2 , with an average elevation of 3555 m above sea level. We undertook an investigation of previous movement of this landslide, measured the volume of material involved, evaluated the potential presence of interstitial ice and snow within the failed deposit, and examined potential climatological impacts on the collapse of the slope. Satellite radar and optical measurements were used to calculate deformation of the landslide in the 5 years leading up to collapse. From 2017 to 2019, the landslide moved ∼ 5 m yr −1 , accelerating to 17 m yr −1 in 2019. Movement took place through both internal deformation and basal sliding. Climate analysis reveals that the collapse took place during peak snowmelt, and 2022 followed 10 years of higher than average positive degree day sums. We also made use of slope stability modeling to test what factors controlled the stability of the area. Models indicate that even a small increase in the water table reduces the factor of safety to < 1, leading to failure. We posit that a combination of permafrost thaw from increasing average temperatures, progressive weakening of the basal shear zone from several years of movement, and an increase in pore-fluid pressure from snowmelt led to the 28 June collapse. Material volumes were estimated using structure from motion (SfM) models incorporating photographs from two field expeditions on 8 July 2022 – 10 d after the slide. Detailed mapping and SfM models indicate that ∼ 1 258 000 ± 150 000 m 3 of material was deposited at the slide toe and ∼ 1 340 000 ± 133 000 m 3 of material was evacuated from the source area. The Chaos Canyon landslide may be representative of ...