Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type

The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth-dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Phytologist
Main Authors: Blume-Werry, Gesche, Dorrepaal, Ellen, Keuper, Frida, Kummu, Matti, Wild, Birgit, Weedon, James T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160080474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160080474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftvuamstcris:oai:research.vu.nl:publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc
record_format openpolar
spelling ftvuamstcris:oai:research.vu.nl:publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc 2024-06-23T07:48:34+00:00 Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type Blume-Werry, Gesche Dorrepaal, Ellen Keuper, Frida Kummu, Matti Wild, Birgit Weedon, James T. 2023-10 https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998 https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160080474&partnerID=8YFLogxK http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160080474&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Blume-Werry , G , Dorrepaal , E , Keuper , F , Kummu , M , Wild , B & Weedon , J T 2023 , ' Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type ' , New Phytologist , vol. 240 , no. 2 , pp. 502-514 . https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998 arctic tundra permafrost plant–soil interactions rhizosphere priming effect root biomass root vertical distribution strategies rooting depth article 2023 ftvuamstcris https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998 2024-06-13T00:48:35Z The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth-dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are suitable to estimate belowground attributes and their consequences, such as rooting depth distribution and its influence on carbon cycling. We performed a meta-analysis of 55 published arctic rooting depth profiles, testing for differences both between distributions based on aboveground vegetation types (Graminoid, Wetland, Erect-shrub, and Prostrate-shrub tundra) and between ‘Root Profile Types’ for which we defined three representative and contrasting clusters. We further analyzed potential impacts of these different rooting depth distributions on rhizosphere priming-induced carbon losses from tundra soils. Rooting depth distribution hardly differed between aboveground vegetation types but varied between Root Profile Types. Accordingly, modelled priming-induced carbon emissions were similar between aboveground vegetation types when they were applied to the entire tundra, but ranged from 7.2 to 17.6 Pg C cumulative emissions until 2100 between individual Root Profile Types. Variations in rooting depth distribution are important for the circumpolar tundra carbon-climate feedback but can currently not be inferred adequately from aboveground vegetation type classifications. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic permafrost Tundra Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU): Research Portal Arctic New Phytologist 240 2 502 514
institution Open Polar
collection Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU): Research Portal
op_collection_id ftvuamstcris
language English
topic arctic tundra
permafrost
plant–soil interactions
rhizosphere priming effect
root biomass
root vertical distribution strategies
rooting depth
spellingShingle arctic tundra
permafrost
plant–soil interactions
rhizosphere priming effect
root biomass
root vertical distribution strategies
rooting depth
Blume-Werry, Gesche
Dorrepaal, Ellen
Keuper, Frida
Kummu, Matti
Wild, Birgit
Weedon, James T.
Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
topic_facet arctic tundra
permafrost
plant–soil interactions
rhizosphere priming effect
root biomass
root vertical distribution strategies
rooting depth
description The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth-dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are suitable to estimate belowground attributes and their consequences, such as rooting depth distribution and its influence on carbon cycling. We performed a meta-analysis of 55 published arctic rooting depth profiles, testing for differences both between distributions based on aboveground vegetation types (Graminoid, Wetland, Erect-shrub, and Prostrate-shrub tundra) and between ‘Root Profile Types’ for which we defined three representative and contrasting clusters. We further analyzed potential impacts of these different rooting depth distributions on rhizosphere priming-induced carbon losses from tundra soils. Rooting depth distribution hardly differed between aboveground vegetation types but varied between Root Profile Types. Accordingly, modelled priming-induced carbon emissions were similar between aboveground vegetation types when they were applied to the entire tundra, but ranged from 7.2 to 17.6 Pg C cumulative emissions until 2100 between individual Root Profile Types. Variations in rooting depth distribution are important for the circumpolar tundra carbon-climate feedback but can currently not be inferred adequately from aboveground vegetation type classifications.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Blume-Werry, Gesche
Dorrepaal, Ellen
Keuper, Frida
Kummu, Matti
Wild, Birgit
Weedon, James T.
author_facet Blume-Werry, Gesche
Dorrepaal, Ellen
Keuper, Frida
Kummu, Matti
Wild, Birgit
Weedon, James T.
author_sort Blume-Werry, Gesche
title Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_short Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_full Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_fullStr Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_full_unstemmed Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
title_sort arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
publishDate 2023
url https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160080474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160080474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
permafrost
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
permafrost
Tundra
op_source Blume-Werry , G , Dorrepaal , E , Keuper , F , Kummu , M , Wild , B & Weedon , J T 2023 , ' Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type ' , New Phytologist , vol. 240 , no. 2 , pp. 502-514 . https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
op_relation https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/3067aa52-8c37-4a62-b36d-097f44e6e4dc
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18998
container_title New Phytologist
container_volume 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 502
op_container_end_page 514
_version_ 1802638935352934400