Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland

As the geographic situation of Finland seems to allow no domestic carbon sequestration, cross-border CO 2 logistics is needed. In this paper, the alternative transportation options for CO 2 from a Finnish capture plant case are assessed. The assessment includes selection of the most favourable stora...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy Procedia
Main Authors: Kujanpää, Lauri, Rauramo, Joonas, Arasto, Antti
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/76ce35d3-976a-46b9-b918-b2ae4299dc53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955405807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://publications.vtt.fi/julkaisut/muut/2011/Cross-border.pdf
id ftvttcrispub:oai:cris.vtt.fi:publications/76ce35d3-976a-46b9-b918-b2ae4299dc53
record_format openpolar
spelling ftvttcrispub:oai:cris.vtt.fi:publications/76ce35d3-976a-46b9-b918-b2ae4299dc53 2023-05-15T15:39:07+02:00 Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland Kujanpää, Lauri Rauramo, Joonas Arasto, Antti 2011-01-01 https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/76ce35d3-976a-46b9-b918-b2ae4299dc53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955405807&partnerID=8YFLogxK https://publications.vtt.fi/julkaisut/muut/2011/Cross-border.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Kujanpää , L , Rauramo , J & Arasto , A 2011 , ' Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland ' , Energy Procedia , vol. 4 , pp. 2425-2431 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136 Capture Finland Storage Transportation article 2011 ftvttcrispub https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136 2022-10-13T13:54:27Z As the geographic situation of Finland seems to allow no domestic carbon sequestration, cross-border CO 2 logistics is needed. In this paper, the alternative transportation options for CO 2 from a Finnish capture plant case are assessed. The assessment includes selection of the most favourable storage areas, route planning for both ship and pipeline transportation, and cost estimates for both alternatives. An actual CCS demonstration is planned by the proprietor power companies of the chosen case plant, a coal condensing power plant on the coast of Western Finland, giving an interesting opportunity to discuss the results in the light of the current development of the demonstration plant. Transportation costs are presented for a ship transportation chain from the case plant to the North Sea and for a pipeline running towards the coast of the Barents Sea. The storage areas were chosen because of the potential storage capacity and currently operational injection activities in both regions. Pipeline transportation is found considerably more expensive than ship transportation as an option for CO 2 transportation from the case demonstration plant to the different storage sites. The levelized costs of shipping the captured CO 2 to the geological formations under the North Sea are estimated to amount to 11,8 €/tCO 2 , excluding the costs for liquefaction. Matching a CO 2 source within EU to a sink outside EU depends on a consistent regulatory framework. In addition to accountability of emissions allowances within the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS), the issues include liabilities of CO 2 handling and storage, other legislation both on national and on Community level as well as international maritime conventions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea VTT's Research Information Portal Barents Sea Energy Procedia 4 2425 2431
institution Open Polar
collection VTT's Research Information Portal
op_collection_id ftvttcrispub
language English
topic Capture
Finland
Storage
Transportation
spellingShingle Capture
Finland
Storage
Transportation
Kujanpää, Lauri
Rauramo, Joonas
Arasto, Antti
Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland
topic_facet Capture
Finland
Storage
Transportation
description As the geographic situation of Finland seems to allow no domestic carbon sequestration, cross-border CO 2 logistics is needed. In this paper, the alternative transportation options for CO 2 from a Finnish capture plant case are assessed. The assessment includes selection of the most favourable storage areas, route planning for both ship and pipeline transportation, and cost estimates for both alternatives. An actual CCS demonstration is planned by the proprietor power companies of the chosen case plant, a coal condensing power plant on the coast of Western Finland, giving an interesting opportunity to discuss the results in the light of the current development of the demonstration plant. Transportation costs are presented for a ship transportation chain from the case plant to the North Sea and for a pipeline running towards the coast of the Barents Sea. The storage areas were chosen because of the potential storage capacity and currently operational injection activities in both regions. Pipeline transportation is found considerably more expensive than ship transportation as an option for CO 2 transportation from the case demonstration plant to the different storage sites. The levelized costs of shipping the captured CO 2 to the geological formations under the North Sea are estimated to amount to 11,8 €/tCO 2 , excluding the costs for liquefaction. Matching a CO 2 source within EU to a sink outside EU depends on a consistent regulatory framework. In addition to accountability of emissions allowances within the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS), the issues include liabilities of CO 2 handling and storage, other legislation both on national and on Community level as well as international maritime conventions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kujanpää, Lauri
Rauramo, Joonas
Arasto, Antti
author_facet Kujanpää, Lauri
Rauramo, Joonas
Arasto, Antti
author_sort Kujanpää, Lauri
title Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland
title_short Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland
title_full Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland
title_fullStr Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland
title_sort cross-border co 2 infrastructure options for a ccs demonstration in finland
publishDate 2011
url https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/76ce35d3-976a-46b9-b918-b2ae4299dc53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955405807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://publications.vtt.fi/julkaisut/muut/2011/Cross-border.pdf
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
genre_facet Barents Sea
op_source Kujanpää , L , Rauramo , J & Arasto , A 2011 , ' Cross-border CO 2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland ' , Energy Procedia , vol. 4 , pp. 2425-2431 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.136
container_title Energy Procedia
container_volume 4
container_start_page 2425
op_container_end_page 2431
_version_ 1766370571361189888