Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea

Steel monopiles, jackets requiring four steel pinpiles, and gravity-based foundations were applied in offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. This paper compares the underwater noise generated during the piling activities of steel monopiles at the Belwind wind farm (Blighbank) with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Scientific World Journal
Main Authors: Norro, A.M.J., Rumes, B., Degraer, S.J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/275386.pdf
id ftvliz:oai:oma.vliz.be:238395
record_format openpolar
spelling ftvliz:oai:oma.vliz.be:238395 2023-05-15T16:33:27+02:00 Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea Norro, A.M.J. Rumes, B. Degraer, S.J. 2013 application/pdf https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/275386.pdf en eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000316879300001 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624 https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/275386.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess %3Ci%3ESci.+World+J.+2013%3C%2Fi%3E%3A+7+pp.+%3Ca+href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1155%2F2013%2F897624%22+target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1155%2F2013%2F897624%3C%2Fa%3E info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2013 ftvliz https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624 2022-05-01T10:15:24Z Steel monopiles, jackets requiring four steel pinpiles, and gravity-based foundations were applied in offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. This paper compares the underwater noise generated during the piling activities of steel monopiles at the Belwind wind farm (Blighbank) with that of jacket pinpiles at the C-Power project (Thorntonbank). Underwater noise was measured at various distances from the pile driving location. The underwater noise was quantified by its zero to peak sound pressure level (Lz-p), unweighted sound exposure level (SEL), cumulative SEL, and 1/3 octave spectra. No significant differences in Lz-p could be demonstrated (monopile Lz-p: 179-194 dB re 1 mu Pa, jacket Lz-p: 172-189 dB re 1 mu Pa). SEL showed no statistical difference between monopile and jacket and varied between 145 and 168 dB re 1 mu Pa(2)s. Furthermore, near identical spectra were measured for both types of piling. Piling of the jacket pinpiles took, however, about 2.5 times the time of the monopile. When standardised to megawatt installed per foundation both types of piling scored near equally. As an illustration, the radius of major behavioural disturbance (Lp-p = 155 dB re 1 mu Pa) in the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena was estimated by a model at 16 km for monopiles and at 8 km for jacket. Article in Journal/Newspaper Harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ): Open Marine Archive (OMA) The Scientific World Journal 2013 1 7
institution Open Polar
collection Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ): Open Marine Archive (OMA)
op_collection_id ftvliz
language English
description Steel monopiles, jackets requiring four steel pinpiles, and gravity-based foundations were applied in offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. This paper compares the underwater noise generated during the piling activities of steel monopiles at the Belwind wind farm (Blighbank) with that of jacket pinpiles at the C-Power project (Thorntonbank). Underwater noise was measured at various distances from the pile driving location. The underwater noise was quantified by its zero to peak sound pressure level (Lz-p), unweighted sound exposure level (SEL), cumulative SEL, and 1/3 octave spectra. No significant differences in Lz-p could be demonstrated (monopile Lz-p: 179-194 dB re 1 mu Pa, jacket Lz-p: 172-189 dB re 1 mu Pa). SEL showed no statistical difference between monopile and jacket and varied between 145 and 168 dB re 1 mu Pa(2)s. Furthermore, near identical spectra were measured for both types of piling. Piling of the jacket pinpiles took, however, about 2.5 times the time of the monopile. When standardised to megawatt installed per foundation both types of piling scored near equally. As an illustration, the radius of major behavioural disturbance (Lp-p = 155 dB re 1 mu Pa) in the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena was estimated by a model at 16 km for monopiles and at 8 km for jacket.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Norro, A.M.J.
Rumes, B.
Degraer, S.J.
spellingShingle Norro, A.M.J.
Rumes, B.
Degraer, S.J.
Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
author_facet Norro, A.M.J.
Rumes, B.
Degraer, S.J.
author_sort Norro, A.M.J.
title Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_short Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_full Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_fullStr Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_sort differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the belgian part of the north sea
publishDate 2013
url https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/275386.pdf
genre Harbour porpoise
Phocoena phocoena
genre_facet Harbour porpoise
Phocoena phocoena
op_source %3Ci%3ESci.+World+J.+2013%3C%2Fi%3E%3A+7+pp.+%3Ca+href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1155%2F2013%2F897624%22+target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1155%2F2013%2F897624%3C%2Fa%3E
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000316879300001
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624
https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/275386.pdf
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624
container_title The Scientific World Journal
container_volume 2013
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 7
_version_ 1766023136553205760