Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?

Articles 27 and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognise Indigenous Peoples’ laws. Art. 34 gives Indigenous Peoples the right to maintain their juridical systems or customs in accordance with international human rights standards. Although the UNDRIP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Laws
Main Author: Lingaas, Carola
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126232
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019
id ftvid:oai:vid.brage.unit.no:11250/3126232
record_format openpolar
spelling ftvid:oai:vid.brage.unit.no:11250/3126232 2024-05-19T07:48:01+00:00 Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage? Lingaas, Carola 2022 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126232 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019 eng eng MDPI Lingaas C. Indigenous Customary Law and Norwegian Domestic Law: Scenes of a (Complementary or Mutually Exclusive) Marriage? Laws. 2022; 11(2):19. urn:issn:2075-471X https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126232 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019 cristin:2007629 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Copyright: © 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 1-13 11 LAWS 2 Samerett Sami law Samer Sami Urfolksrettigheter Indigenous rights VDP::Rettsvitenskap: 340 VDP::Law: 340 Peer reviewed Journal article 2022 ftvid https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019 2024-04-19T00:32:24Z Articles 27 and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognise Indigenous Peoples’ laws. Art. 34 gives Indigenous Peoples the right to maintain their juridical systems or customs in accordance with international human rights standards. Although the UNDRIP is soft law, its core is arguably customary law and, therefore, a binding source of law. For States with Indigenous People, such as Norway, the UNDRIP is of paramount importance, from a legal, political, and not least moral perspective. This paper discusses norm hierarchies and tensions that are created in the meeting between the Indigenous customary law of the Sámi and statutory domestic Norwegian law. The introduction of customary, commonly unwritten, Indigenous rules into the judicial portfolio of a State creates an obvious challenge: what is their legal status? Can Indigenous law set aside domestic statutory norms? Some might argue that due to historical wrong, Indigenous law should always take precedence when domestic law conflicts with it. While Norwegian domestic law acknowledges the precedence of certain core human rights treaties over domestic laws, the same is not valid for Indigenous rights. How then should Indigenous custom be dealt with before a court of law, and how do the different legal systems relate to each other? This paper is foremost based on theoretical, to a lesser degree also on empirical material. It discusses on a general level the relationship between different legal systems within the same State and, on a specific level, the dealing of the Norwegian courts with Sámi Indigenous laws and customs. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Sámi VID Specialized University: VID Open Laws 11 2 19
institution Open Polar
collection VID Specialized University: VID Open
op_collection_id ftvid
language English
topic Samerett
Sami law
Samer
Sami
Urfolksrettigheter
Indigenous rights
VDP::Rettsvitenskap: 340
VDP::Law: 340
spellingShingle Samerett
Sami law
Samer
Sami
Urfolksrettigheter
Indigenous rights
VDP::Rettsvitenskap: 340
VDP::Law: 340
Lingaas, Carola
Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
topic_facet Samerett
Sami law
Samer
Sami
Urfolksrettigheter
Indigenous rights
VDP::Rettsvitenskap: 340
VDP::Law: 340
description Articles 27 and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognise Indigenous Peoples’ laws. Art. 34 gives Indigenous Peoples the right to maintain their juridical systems or customs in accordance with international human rights standards. Although the UNDRIP is soft law, its core is arguably customary law and, therefore, a binding source of law. For States with Indigenous People, such as Norway, the UNDRIP is of paramount importance, from a legal, political, and not least moral perspective. This paper discusses norm hierarchies and tensions that are created in the meeting between the Indigenous customary law of the Sámi and statutory domestic Norwegian law. The introduction of customary, commonly unwritten, Indigenous rules into the judicial portfolio of a State creates an obvious challenge: what is their legal status? Can Indigenous law set aside domestic statutory norms? Some might argue that due to historical wrong, Indigenous law should always take precedence when domestic law conflicts with it. While Norwegian domestic law acknowledges the precedence of certain core human rights treaties over domestic laws, the same is not valid for Indigenous rights. How then should Indigenous custom be dealt with before a court of law, and how do the different legal systems relate to each other? This paper is foremost based on theoretical, to a lesser degree also on empirical material. It discusses on a general level the relationship between different legal systems within the same State and, on a specific level, the dealing of the Norwegian courts with Sámi Indigenous laws and customs. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lingaas, Carola
author_facet Lingaas, Carola
author_sort Lingaas, Carola
title Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
title_short Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
title_full Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
title_fullStr Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: Scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
title_sort indigenous customary law and norwegian domestic law: scenes of a (complementary or mutually exclusive) marriage?
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126232
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019
genre sami
Sámi
genre_facet sami
Sámi
op_source 1-13
11
LAWS
2
op_relation Lingaas C. Indigenous Customary Law and Norwegian Domestic Law: Scenes of a (Complementary or Mutually Exclusive) Marriage? Laws. 2022; 11(2):19.
urn:issn:2075-471X
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126232
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019
cristin:2007629
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
Copyright: © 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019
container_title Laws
container_volume 11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 19
_version_ 1799488503359209472