Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority

Reconciliation without the majority: The Truth and Reconciliation Commisson of Norway, Oslo, 4. - 6. mai 2022 Arrangør: VID The Norwegianization policy against the Sami, Kvens, and other minorities that focused on their forceful assimilation at the expense of their identity, language, and culture ro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zeleke, Girum
Format: Lecture
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055794
id ftvid:oai:vid.brage.unit.no:11250/3055794
record_format openpolar
spelling ftvid:oai:vid.brage.unit.no:11250/3055794 2023-05-15T18:11:21+02:00 Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority Zeleke, Girum 2022 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055794 eng eng https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055794 cristin:2030329 South Africa Canada Sami Norwegianization reconciliation Norway Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Lecture 2022 ftvid 2023-03-08T23:48:47Z Reconciliation without the majority: The Truth and Reconciliation Commisson of Norway, Oslo, 4. - 6. mai 2022 Arrangør: VID The Norwegianization policy against the Sami, Kvens, and other minorities that focused on their forceful assimilation at the expense of their identity, language, and culture roughly a century from the 1850s demonstrates an element of Norwegianization. The Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established in 2018, aims to reconcile and restore the status of the alienated minority groups within mainstream society. This paper focuses on the critical nation-building project and liberal principles while the Sami and Kven minorities were ill-treated under the past colonization. From a liberal point of views efforts at reconciliation should be minimal in relation to a focus on the pursuit of justice, which should become paramount. The discussion will take simple analogies of the Norwegian TRC, and the Canadian and South African TRCs. These countries have such different historical, social, and political contexts that case selection, and scale of analysis, constructing equivalence would weaken the reliability of the data. This paper focuses on factual and comparable processes based on their objectives and milestones. The successes and failures of the TRCs are based on their respective objectives. The most common weakness of the TRCs worldwide has been a lack of involvement in addressing social and economic transformation or related to the mandate commission members are given. They can limit the power of the majority by giving the indigenous and other minorities extra rights so they can keep their identities safe. submittedVersion Lecture sami sami VID Specialized University: VID Open (Brage) Canada Norway
institution Open Polar
collection VID Specialized University: VID Open (Brage)
op_collection_id ftvid
language English
topic South Africa
Canada
Sami
Norwegianization
reconciliation
Norway
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)
spellingShingle South Africa
Canada
Sami
Norwegianization
reconciliation
Norway
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)
Zeleke, Girum
Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
topic_facet South Africa
Canada
Sami
Norwegianization
reconciliation
Norway
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)
description Reconciliation without the majority: The Truth and Reconciliation Commisson of Norway, Oslo, 4. - 6. mai 2022 Arrangør: VID The Norwegianization policy against the Sami, Kvens, and other minorities that focused on their forceful assimilation at the expense of their identity, language, and culture roughly a century from the 1850s demonstrates an element of Norwegianization. The Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established in 2018, aims to reconcile and restore the status of the alienated minority groups within mainstream society. This paper focuses on the critical nation-building project and liberal principles while the Sami and Kven minorities were ill-treated under the past colonization. From a liberal point of views efforts at reconciliation should be minimal in relation to a focus on the pursuit of justice, which should become paramount. The discussion will take simple analogies of the Norwegian TRC, and the Canadian and South African TRCs. These countries have such different historical, social, and political contexts that case selection, and scale of analysis, constructing equivalence would weaken the reliability of the data. This paper focuses on factual and comparable processes based on their objectives and milestones. The successes and failures of the TRCs are based on their respective objectives. The most common weakness of the TRCs worldwide has been a lack of involvement in addressing social and economic transformation or related to the mandate commission members are given. They can limit the power of the majority by giving the indigenous and other minorities extra rights so they can keep their identities safe. submittedVersion
format Lecture
author Zeleke, Girum
author_facet Zeleke, Girum
author_sort Zeleke, Girum
title Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
title_short Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
title_full Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
title_fullStr Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
title_full_unstemmed Forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
title_sort forshadowing reconciliation without the majority
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055794
geographic Canada
Norway
geographic_facet Canada
Norway
genre sami
sami
genre_facet sami
sami
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055794
cristin:2030329
_version_ 1766184028541550592