Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues

Even as the public is demanding that more criminals be incarcerated and that their sentences be lengthened, the problems of America's prisons and jails continue to plague, if not overwhelm,us. More than two-thirds of the states are currently under court order to correct conditions that violate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robbins, Ira P.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law 1987
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol40/iss4/1
https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2671&context=vlr
id ftvanderbiltunls:oai:scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu:vlr-2671
record_format openpolar
spelling ftvanderbiltunls:oai:scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu:vlr-2671 2023-05-15T15:15:22+02:00 Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues Robbins, Ira P. 1987-05-01T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol40/iss4/1 https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2671&context=vlr unknown Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol40/iss4/1 https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2671&context=vlr Vanderbilt Law Review corrections punishment prisons for profit Law Law Enforcement and Corrections text 1987 ftvanderbiltunls 2022-05-30T12:50:26Z Even as the public is demanding that more criminals be incarcerated and that their sentences be lengthened, the problems of America's prisons and jails continue to plague, if not overwhelm,us. More than two-thirds of the states are currently under court order to correct conditions that violate the United States Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. There are many important questions, but there are still no clear, satisfactory answers. The last few years have thus witnessed diverse, controversial developments. Some, like the voluntary accreditation of correctional facilities by the Commission on Accreditation for Corrections, have begun to take root. Others, like a 1982 proposal in Congress to build an Arctic penitentiary for serious offenders, have been inconsequential. Yet the number of prisons and the cost of housing them still mount. Prison and jail populations have doubled in a decade, and-with preventive detention, mandatory-minimum sentences, habitual-offender statutes, and the abolition of parole in some jurisdictions-there is no relief in sight. Some states are even leasing or purchasing space in other states. And it is costing the taxpayers approximately $17 million a day to operate the facilities,with estimates ranging up to $60 a day per inmate. Several commentators have not so facetiously noted that we could finance college educations at less cost for all of the inmates in the country. To reduce some of this stress on the system, a new concept has emerged: the privatization of corrections, occasionally known as "prisons for profit." The idea is to remove the operation (and sometimes the ownership) of an institution from the local, state, or federal government and turn it over to a private corporation. At the outset, it should be emphasized that private prisons are different from the notion of private industries in prison--Chief Justice Burger's "factories with fences" proposal-which seeks to turn prisoners into productive members of society by having them work at a decent ... Text Arctic Vanderbilt University Law School: Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Vanderbilt University Law School: Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
op_collection_id ftvanderbiltunls
language unknown
topic corrections
punishment
prisons for profit
Law
Law Enforcement and Corrections
spellingShingle corrections
punishment
prisons for profit
Law
Law Enforcement and Corrections
Robbins, Ira P.
Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues
topic_facet corrections
punishment
prisons for profit
Law
Law Enforcement and Corrections
description Even as the public is demanding that more criminals be incarcerated and that their sentences be lengthened, the problems of America's prisons and jails continue to plague, if not overwhelm,us. More than two-thirds of the states are currently under court order to correct conditions that violate the United States Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. There are many important questions, but there are still no clear, satisfactory answers. The last few years have thus witnessed diverse, controversial developments. Some, like the voluntary accreditation of correctional facilities by the Commission on Accreditation for Corrections, have begun to take root. Others, like a 1982 proposal in Congress to build an Arctic penitentiary for serious offenders, have been inconsequential. Yet the number of prisons and the cost of housing them still mount. Prison and jail populations have doubled in a decade, and-with preventive detention, mandatory-minimum sentences, habitual-offender statutes, and the abolition of parole in some jurisdictions-there is no relief in sight. Some states are even leasing or purchasing space in other states. And it is costing the taxpayers approximately $17 million a day to operate the facilities,with estimates ranging up to $60 a day per inmate. Several commentators have not so facetiously noted that we could finance college educations at less cost for all of the inmates in the country. To reduce some of this stress on the system, a new concept has emerged: the privatization of corrections, occasionally known as "prisons for profit." The idea is to remove the operation (and sometimes the ownership) of an institution from the local, state, or federal government and turn it over to a private corporation. At the outset, it should be emphasized that private prisons are different from the notion of private industries in prison--Chief Justice Burger's "factories with fences" proposal-which seeks to turn prisoners into productive members of society by having them work at a decent ...
format Text
author Robbins, Ira P.
author_facet Robbins, Ira P.
author_sort Robbins, Ira P.
title Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues
title_short Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues
title_full Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues
title_fullStr Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues
title_full_unstemmed Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues
title_sort privatization of corrections: defining the issues
publisher Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
publishDate 1987
url https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol40/iss4/1
https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2671&context=vlr
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Vanderbilt Law Review
op_relation https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol40/iss4/1
https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2671&context=vlr
_version_ 1766345734065487872