Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley

Since 1982. the Canadian Constitution has "recognized and affirmed the Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Indian, Inuit, and Métis peoples of Canada," peoples that hold their unique status within the federation by virtue of their prior social organisation. The author argues that, when Abo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olthuis, Brent Brian
Other Authors: Webber, Jeremy H. A., Chartrand, Paul L.A.H.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1828/1932
id ftuvicpubl:oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/1932
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuvicpubl:oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/1932 2023-05-15T16:55:11+02:00 Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley Olthuis, Brent Brian Webber, Jeremy H. A. Chartrand, Paul L.A.H. 2005 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1828/1932 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/1828/1932 Available to the World Wide Web Metis legal status Canada Constitution Act 1982 UVic Subject Index::Humanities and Social Sciences::Social Sciences::Law Thesis 2005 ftuvicpubl 2022-05-19T06:11:05Z Since 1982. the Canadian Constitution has "recognized and affirmed the Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Indian, Inuit, and Métis peoples of Canada," peoples that hold their unique status within the federation by virtue of their prior social organisation. The author argues that, when Aboriginal rights are invoked, analysis should focus on the community in which the right is said to reside. Contemporary rights-holding communities are those linked to the normative orders that preceded and survived those of the later arrivals: in this regard, the Métis are not dissimilar from the other recognised Aboriginal peoples. It is the community's capacity to determine the norms applicable to its members' lives that is important, not the actual content of that order at a particular time: Aboriginal societies must be afforded the latitude to pursue their own aims and ambitions, and their rights must not be limited to activities that appear objectively 'Aboriginal". Thesis inuit Metis University of Victoria (Canada): UVicDSpace Canada Indian
institution Open Polar
collection University of Victoria (Canada): UVicDSpace
op_collection_id ftuvicpubl
language English
topic Metis
legal status
Canada
Constitution Act
1982
UVic Subject Index::Humanities and Social Sciences::Social Sciences::Law
spellingShingle Metis
legal status
Canada
Constitution Act
1982
UVic Subject Index::Humanities and Social Sciences::Social Sciences::Law
Olthuis, Brent Brian
Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley
topic_facet Metis
legal status
Canada
Constitution Act
1982
UVic Subject Index::Humanities and Social Sciences::Social Sciences::Law
description Since 1982. the Canadian Constitution has "recognized and affirmed the Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Indian, Inuit, and Métis peoples of Canada," peoples that hold their unique status within the federation by virtue of their prior social organisation. The author argues that, when Aboriginal rights are invoked, analysis should focus on the community in which the right is said to reside. Contemporary rights-holding communities are those linked to the normative orders that preceded and survived those of the later arrivals: in this regard, the Métis are not dissimilar from the other recognised Aboriginal peoples. It is the community's capacity to determine the norms applicable to its members' lives that is important, not the actual content of that order at a particular time: Aboriginal societies must be afforded the latitude to pursue their own aims and ambitions, and their rights must not be limited to activities that appear objectively 'Aboriginal".
author2 Webber, Jeremy H. A.
Chartrand, Paul L.A.H.
format Thesis
author Olthuis, Brent Brian
author_facet Olthuis, Brent Brian
author_sort Olthuis, Brent Brian
title Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley
title_short Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley
title_full Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley
title_fullStr Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley
title_full_unstemmed Constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in light of R. v. Powley
title_sort constitution's peoples: a robust and group-centred interpretation of section 35 of the constitution act, 1982, in light of r. v. powley
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/1828/1932
geographic Canada
Indian
geographic_facet Canada
Indian
genre inuit
Metis
genre_facet inuit
Metis
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1828/1932
op_rights Available to the World Wide Web
_version_ 1766046172146827264